So scientists think the rise in homosexuality is due the the increase of intake of soy!
Dates
· UTC
Gay? Maybe its 'cause yer momma fed you Soy!
Archived35 replies · 881 views
This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.
EdelBrock wrote: So scientists think the rise in homosexuality is due the the increase of intake of soy!
NO, mad people think it's soy.
Scientists know it's a response to population criticality, same as it is in every other species on the planet.
Doctor? wrote:
EdelBrock wrote: So scientists think the rise in homosexuality is due the the increase of intake of soy!
NO, mad people think it's soy.
Scientists know it's a response to population criticality, same as it is in every other species on the planet.
yeah, and next you'll tell me the world is round
Is it any wonder the birthrate is dropping in Japan (hovering around 1.3 these days) since we Japanese eat so many soy products...........tofu, miso, natto....etc...... and we're all homosexual or at least bisexual and apparently that makes us 'feminised' according to the article and less likely to reproduce.
The crazy crap that those church people think of....in the article though.....
Doctor? wrote:
EdelBrock wrote: So scientists think the rise in homosexuality is due the the increase of intake of soy!
NO, mad people think it's soy.
Scientists know it's a response to population criticality, same as it is in every other species on the planet.
In which case we should be down on our knees thanking them...no, scratch that.. but we should be thankful for the genetic diversity in our species that allows us to survive various environmental challenges, and in the case of population criticality, thankful to our gay brethren and sisteren for making survival easier for all of us. 
Doctor? wrote:
EdelBrock wrote: So scientists think the rise in homosexuality is due the the increase of intake of soy!
NO, mad people think it's soy.
I didn't catch this before but why is New Order classified with mad people? If Hooky and Barney believe it, then it must be true!
EdelBrock wrote: I didn't catch this before but why is New Order classified with mad people?
Speak for yerself, pistol pete.
Burt Reynolds wrote:
EdelBrock wrote: I didn't catch this before but why is New Order classified with mad people?
Speak for yerself, pistol pete.
Hey I was only quoting Cambo
Comrade Shampanyov wrote:
Doctor? wrote:
EdelBrock wrote: So scientists think the rise in homosexuality is due the the increase of intake of soy!
NO, mad people think it's soy.
Scientists know it's a response to population criticality, same as it is in every other species on the planet.
In which case we should be down on our knees thanking them...no, scratch that.. but we should be thankful for the genetic diversity in our species that allows us to survive various environmental challenges, and in the case of population criticality, thankful to our gay brethren and sisteren for making survival easier for all of us.
Absolutely, support your local chutney ferret!
Three things happen in an animal population before collapse.......
- Infertility rises (check)
- Poovery increases (check)
- Mothers eat their offspring (are we there yet?)
Doctor? wrote:
Comrade Shampanyov wrote:
Doctor? wrote:
EdelBrock wrote: So scientists think the rise in homosexuality is due the the increase of intake of soy!
NO, mad people think it's soy.
Scientists know it's a response to population criticality, same as it is in every other species on the planet.
In which case we should be down on our knees thanking them...no, scratch that.. but we should be thankful for the genetic diversity in our species that allows us to survive various environmental challenges, and in the case of population criticality, thankful to our gay brethren and sisteren for making survival easier for all of us.
Absolutely, support your local chutney ferret!
Three things happen in an animal population before collapse.......
- Infertility rises (check)
- Poovery increases (check)
- Mothers eat their offspring (are we there yet?)
Abortion maybe a civilized variant of eating your offspring?
Killing the young is not the thing, it's the eating that's important.
Besides, it's been going on for years abd we're still multiplying.
Doctor? wrote: Killing the young is not the thing, it's the eating that's important.
Maybe because nutritional resources are scarce at the point of population collapse? And eating your offspring is a twofer (fewer mouths to compete for nutrients, and mom picks up a few extra nutrients)?
Doctor? wrote: Besides, it's been going on for years abd we're still multiplying.
I was thinking more about the rough similarities of the two behaviors, rather than the effectiveness.
Comrade Shampanyov wrote:
Doctor? wrote: Killing the young is not the thing, it's the eating that's important.
Maybe because nutritional resources are scarce at the point of population collapse? And eating your offspring is a twofer (fewer mouths to compete for nutrients, and mom picks up a few extra nutrients)?
Doctor? wrote: Besides, it's been going on for years abd we're still multiplying.
I was thinking more about the rough similarities of the two behaviors, rather than the effectiveness.
I didn't mean the effectiveness either, I was refering to it as a harbinger of the final collapse.
Oh, well I'm sure we're not there yet, what with our plentiful oil supplies ensuring a continued bountiful harvest...
So what think ye of neolithic religions promoting unbridled fecundity (and as part and parcel of that ideology, damning all non-procreative sex, i.e., sex between infertile couples, sex between couples who choose not to conceive, recreational sex, and of course, homosexual sex)?
(loaded question) :D
Are we onto Soylent Green now? I'm pretty sure Arthur C. Clarke had nought to do with that. ;)
Doctor? wrote:
Three things happen in an animal population before collapse.......
- Infertility rises (check)
- Poovery increases (check)
- Mothers eat their offspring (are we there yet?)
So the dianoo-sawers we're a bunch a pooves!
But one chink in the theory, if the infertility rises and so does poovery, then where the hell are all the mothers getting babies to eat?
NOOLigan wrote: Are we onto Soylent Green now? I'm pretty sure Arthur C. Clarke had nought to do with that. ;)
aye! I think yer onto something Ron! its called SOYlent green.... kinda goes in line with Cambos theory
Eaten our babies while turning ourselves gay... a twofer!
ahhh, consider the source fellow seppos.
This comes from a site called World Net Daily aka "Wing Nut Daily" a place where deluded conservatives can rant about Islamists under the bed, liberals in every cul de sac, and that the homosexual agenda will destroy their beloved Jesus Land.
BonoShed wrote: ahhh, consider the source fellow seppos.
This comes from a site called World Net Daily aka "Wing Nut Daily" a place where deluded conservatives can rant about Islamists under the bed, liberals in every cul de sac, and that the homosexual agenda will destroy their beloved Jesus Land.
But it has quoatations! So it must be true!
Just gives me a valid reason to tell my wife to stop serving me tofu.
EdelBrock wrote:
BonoShed wrote: ahhh, consider the source fellow seppos.
This comes from a site called World Net Daily aka "Wing Nut Daily" a place where deluded conservatives can rant about Islamists under the bed, liberals in every cul de sac, and that the homosexual agenda will destroy their beloved Jesus Land.
But it has quoatations! So it must be true!
Just gives me a valid reason to tell my wife to stop serving me tofu.
hey Jarhead, just tell the missus "Beef, it's what's for dinner, honey."
BonoShed wrote:
EdelBrock wrote:
BonoShed wrote: ahhh, consider the source fellow seppos.
This comes from a site called World Net Daily aka "Wing Nut Daily" a place where deluded conservatives can rant about Islamists under the bed, liberals in every cul de sac, and that the homosexual agenda will destroy their beloved Jesus Land.
But it has quoatations! So it must be true!
Just gives me a valid reason to tell my wife to stop serving me tofu.
hey Jarhead, just tell the missus "Beef, it's what's for dinner, honey."
Clever, so that quote has more uses than turning around in bed and saying it in a sultry voice
EdelBrock wrote:
BonoShed wrote:
EdelBrock wrote:
BonoShed wrote: ahhh, consider the source fellow seppos.
This comes from a site called World Net Daily aka "Wing Nut Daily" a place where deluded conservatives can rant about Islamists under the bed, liberals in every cul de sac, and that the homosexual agenda will destroy their beloved Jesus Land.
But it has quoatations! So it must be true!
Just gives me a valid reason to tell my wife to stop serving me tofu.
hey Jarhead, just tell the missus "Beef, it's what's for dinner, honey."
Clever, so that quote has more uses than turning around in bed and saying it in a sultry voice
Well You could ask her if she wants A1 sauce with that. 
leather_girl wrote:
The crazy crap that those church people think of....in the article though.....
Small penises imo
Tristan Jayol wrote:
leather_girl wrote:
The crazy crap that those church people think of....in the article though.....
Small penises imo
I'm pretty sure that's just a stereotype, but sometimes when I hear the crazy rubbish that those religious people from the US say (the soy product=homosexuality belief expressed in the article), I keep wondering whether they're trying to be a caricature of themselves, or whether they seriously believe it.
leather_girl wrote:
Tristan Jayol wrote:
leather_girl wrote:
The crazy crap that those church people think of....in the article though.....
Small penises imo
I'm pretty sure that's just a stereotype.
Not really, its pretty well known.... have any doubts about it watch porn and you won't see a single asian swingin' around the ankles....
Shouldn't Lesbians be going extinct? Should be plenty of fertile women to have babies, all you need is one soy-free stud to fertilize all these women.
Now what about the small penis problem... all these unhappy gay men who will have small penises to play with. Small penises like Asians have. So all men will become like Asians.
EdelBrock wrote:
leather_girl wrote:
Tristan Jayol wrote:
leather_girl wrote:
The crazy crap that those church people think of....in the article though.....
Small penises imo
I'm pretty sure that's just a stereotype.
Not really, its pretty well known.... have any doubts about it watch porn and you won't see a single asian swingin' around the ankles....
being that she's from japan maybe she knows something you don't know. Unless you spent some time in japan or korea while in military and engaged in risky sexual behavior.
