I couldnt see the point of it from the beginning, so i started my own game of making up imaginary song titles/artists.
It's still no more fun, and no ones pulled me on it yet.
Dates
· UTC
I don't wish to sound harsh ....
Archived69 replies · 1,924 views
This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.
← Back to Behind Closed Doors
Showing posts 31–60 of 70
↑ First post
Latest post ↓
Sadly, this is probably the best thread in which to say:
The band is long dead.
The 'worst song ever' 'worst gig ever' 'worst day of my life ever' threads are just depressing.
If this site ever becomes even a reasonable pastiche of what it once was, then I'll return.
Until then, goodbye my friends...
El Jarvo wrote:
I am totally missing the point. Can someone explain?!
Because the thread starter needed to to up her post count to gain access to the weeding forum.
Christ knows why others are contributing. But of course, the higher ones post count, the larger ones genitalia...
Uncle Liam wrote:
El Jarvo wrote:
I am totally missing the point. Can someone explain?!
Because the thread starter needed to to up her post count to gain access to the weeding forum.
Christ knows why others are contributing. But of course, the higher ones post count, the larger ones genitalia...
and HENCE the MORE girls you GET,no?
Uncle Liam wrote:
El Jarvo wrote:
I am totally missing the point. Can someone explain?!
Because the thread starter needed to to up her post count to gain access to the weeding forum.
Christ knows why others are contributing. But of course, the higher ones post count, the larger ones genitalia...
i AGREE
ROCKET MICK wrote:
Uncle Liam wrote:
El Jarvo wrote:
I am totally missing the point. Can someone explain?!
Because the thread starter needed to to up her post count to gain access to the weeding forum.
Christ knows why others are contributing. But of course, the higher ones post count, the larger ones genitalia...
i AGREE
I'm up to 5 inches now, nearly.
Burt Reynolds wrote: so i started my own game of making up imaginary song titles/artists.
Brilliant
Gazman wrote:
Burt Reynolds wrote: so i started my own game of making up imaginary song titles/artists.
Brilliant
scroll back. I think there might have been the odd drunken classic.
Uncle Liam wrote:
But of course, the higher ones post count, the larger ones genitalia...
Yikes! I'm in big trouble if that's the case...
Gazman wrote:
Burt Reynolds wrote: so i started my own game of making up imaginary song titles/artists.
Brilliant
But in MY world there ARE rEAL! 
SHED wrote:
Uncle Liam wrote:
El Jarvo wrote:
I am totally missing the point. Can someone explain?!
Because the thread starter needed to to up her post count to gain access to the weeding forum.
Christ knows why others are contributing. But of course, the higher ones post count, the larger ones genitalia...
and HENCE the MORE girls you GET,no?
Are you saying there are a few TIGHT cnuts round here too?
Uncle Liam wrote:
Christ knows why others are contributing. But of course, the higher ones post count, the larger ones genitalia...
:uhoh:
Someone should have warned us girls about this
Minx wrote:
Uncle Liam wrote:
Christ knows why others are contributing. But of course, the higher ones post count, the larger ones genitalia...
:uhoh:Someone should have warned us girls about this
You have gone UP in my estimation...
See? This really is the end. The normally very sensible Mr Nash is making quasi-grandiose "I'm leaving, you'll miss me when I'm gone"-style announcements and, like Minx, I'm now having nightmare visions of grotesquely extended labia.
DID IAN DIE FOR THIS??????????????
PETER COATES'S BELATED REDEMPTION wrote:
DID IAN DIE FOR THIS??????????????
Yes. yes he did.
Uncle Liam wrote:
PETER COATES'S BELATED REDEMPTION wrote:
DID IAN DIE FOR THIS??????????????
Yes. yes he did.
I fucking thought as much.
I think saying the forums have gone to the dogs since the band ended is a bit unfair.
They were equally as shite beforehand
I will stand up and say that there is at least one section of the board, maybe two, which are still decent. Taht is, the sections of the board not ruined by geeks.
Even this board has its moments. Ok. its usually on a Saturday night when grant starts posting when he's pissed, but still...
As soon as Politics and Religion reared its ugly head on here, this place took a nose dive......
If memory serves Uncle Liam, you were one of the main protagonists of both types of threads mentioned were you not?
ShugZV wrote: As soon as Politics and Religion reared its ugly head on here, this place took a nose dive......
Aye, I agree - as soon as football came in it all went downhill
Ally wrote: I think saying the forums have gone to the dogs since the band ended is a bit unfair.
They were equally as shite beforehand
AT Fcuking LAST........someone GETS this pile of CRAP.A shit band and pathetic FANS deserve a TOSSPOT forum.... 
Ally wrote: Haven't you got some Americans to slag off?
Get back to work, slacker.
You know, I would. But free speech isnt in effect on this board. Instead, we are bound by a meaningless babble about "community standards" which is their to try and enforce the myth that we're all one big happy community, instead of a load of people who like (or LikeD, in my case) the same band.
So basically, people can act like geeks all they want, but you're not allowed to tell them that they're a geek.
Uncle Liam wrote:
Ally wrote: Haven't you got some Americans to slag off?
Get back to work, slacker.
You know, I would. But free speech isnt in effect on this board. Instead, we are bound by a meaningless babble about "community standards" which is their to try and enforce the myth that we're all one big happy community, instead of a load of people who like (or LikeD, in my case) the same band.
So basically, people can act like geeks all they want, but you're not allowed to tell them that they're a geek.
You're a geek
