Thanks But No Thanks wrote:
Quick question - why do i keep seeing lose spelt as loose these days? Have i missed a memo or something? I mean, you expect it from thick bastards commenting on YouTube but i seem to have started seeing it from journalists now. WTF is going on?
No one cares about spelling anymore - they have Spellcheck on their emails and Word documents, or they deliberately misspell in texts. I'm guilty of this myself. In fact i was told off recently for typing loose in a text message. Silly of me, as the idea is to shorten words in text messages rather than elongate them. Nonetheless my defence was something like this:
Pronounce these words:
Bose
Hose
Nose
Pose
Rose
Now pronounce Lose.
Pronounce these words:
Choose
Snooze
Zoos
Boos
Igloos
Poos (probably appropriate for this post)
So going by the above examples lose should really be spelt loose.
People may argue that loose is of course a completely different word, with another meaning. But sometimes a word can be spelt the same way and have two different meanings. Eg: Wind (moving air) or wind (to wind your watch). So why not have the 'loose' spelling covering lose and loose? (Rhetorical question; please don't answer with: "because that's not what's in the dictionary").
There's sort of a flaw in my 'wind' example but I'm not going to point it out...
Anyway that's my defence for misspelling lose. I'm not sure if this post counts as anally retentive but um, I feel a bit weird now...