A show screened on the UK last night highlighted the current plight of McDougals fast-food restaurant, currently quaking in its clown shoes after current testing on lab rats (free the lab mice) is suggesting that humans could get hooked to the tasty burgers and frittlers, in the same way a drug user becomes keen on mustard. In this situation, over indulgence from certain obese people are provoking American lawyers to come running to help. And now armed with the 'addiction' hook, McDougal's could suffer in the same way as some of the baccy companies with large payouts to disgruntled customer bases.
The options to McD's are - curtail the fat and sugar, introduce more natural good healthy products, or get rid of Raymond McDougal the Clown (which wipes the entire slate clean). McD's have already set to work, introducing fresh salads in little plastic containers, packets of fruit and less fat and sugar in the chips and burglars.
The thing that I can't get my head around is why McDunky Dibblers has been singled out? - what about Chinese takeaways, pizzas, eggs, smoked haddock and the common bread roll? - surely if you stick it to McD's, you must also stick it to the Colonel with his especially pleasant recipes.
But more fundamental is this, won't a sensible judge simple throw the argument out of court within 2.3 seconds? - Fatty, stop eating shit and take a walk.
It seems very simple.
At what level of fatness do you get a pay out? - its ridiculous.
![]()