Skip to content

1963

Archived

26 replies · 564 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

hello everyone :)

i was just wondering, what's your favourite version of 1963 if you had to pick?

mine's definitely the true faith b-side, without a doubt. what d'ya all think?

cya later :thumb:

0 likes

The Substance second-disc version (I have yet to head a decent "remix" of this track) :thumb:

0 likes

Best Of - north american release

0 likes

Without a shadow of doubt the Stephen Hague version on the b-side to True Faith was the best. Its a very under-rated NO song. The Arthur Baker mix was just a hidious mess.

0 likes

The version released with the video for the song (forgotten when that was).

0 likes

the b-side version on Substance

0 likes

Originally posted by NO Regret Without a shadow of doubt the Stephen Hague version on the b-side to True Faith was the best. Its a very under-rated NO song. The Arthur Baker mix was just a hidious mess.

agree and agree.

0 likes

Possibly the True Faith 12" original b-side, but it has never been a favourite. Maybe if it had been an instrumental ?

0 likes

The one which came out in 94 or 95, i.e. the one Hooky actually appears on.

Can remember my first listen to this back in 1987 and just thinking - where's Hooky? Was never really a favourite for that reason alone but that 94/95 version rectified that.

0 likes

Originally posted by Al Jarvis The one which came out in 94 or 95, i.e. the one Hooky actually appears on.Can remember my first listen to this back in 1987 and just thinking - where's Hooky? Was never really a favourite for that reason alone but that 94/95 version rectified that.

Yeah, I'll second that: on the one hand the mid-90s version seems a bit too slick; on t'other I think it has extra depth - largely, as Al suggests, 'cos Hooky is foregrounded (doesn't he emerge belatedly at the end of the '87 version with a wonderfully mournful but painfully brief bassline - you just think, "where've yer been for the last four minutes?")

0 likes

Originally posted by Al Jarvis The one which came out in 94 or 95, i.e. the one Hooky actually appears on.Can remember my first listen to this back in 1987 and just thinking - where's Hooky? Was never really a favourite for that reason alone but that 94/95 version rectified that.

It seems that Hague hates Hooky's bass :(

0 likes

.

0 likes

Hey Elsa

You look so pretty :love2:

0 likes

Originally posted by Sítio do Pica-Pau Amarelo Hey Elsa You look so pretty :love2:

put it away Julio:wink:

0 likes

Is she a travesti ? :scratch:

0 likes

Originally posted by elsa .

More comments like this one would be gratefully received.:clap:

0 likes

:nonono::nonono:

Originally posted by Sítio do Pica-Pau Amarelo Is she a travesti ? :scratch:

Thanks for the insight, Julio!

0 likes

ITS GOT TO BE THE SUBSTANCE 2 SIDE ....:laugh:

0 likes

Substance, b-side version. Really great !!

0 likes

I love both but slightly prefer the Nineteen63-95 Arthur Baker remix. The original b-side version has a nice sparse feel to it but the '95 mix somehow sounds more like New Order. If only Baker (instead of Hague) had produced Republic...

The '95 mix also does away with the Prince-inspired drum intro. Prince? Yes. Listen to the drums on his early-1987 song "It". They've borrowed other things from the purple one as well. The sample of a baby's voice at the end of The Perfect Kiss 12" is the same as the one that ends Prince's "Delirious". Also, the sequenced bassline on the bridge of Round & Round is uncomfortably close to the sequenced bassline of "I Would Die 4 U".

0 likes

I like the one on the 1994 British version of "Best of". A little cleaner sounding and better arranged than the '87 original. The 1995 (Baker?) version is fantastic too. I didn't learn to like the 95 version till I heard the 87 version later. (Yes, I'm such a recent fan I bought "best of..." before "Substance"!)

0 likes

Originally posted by Michael Riddles I like the one on the 1994 British version of "Best of". A little cleaner sounding and better arranged than the '87 original. The 1995 (Baker?) version is fantastic too. I didn't learn to like the 95 version till I heard the 87 version later. (Yes, I'm such a recent fan I bought "best of..." before "Substance"!)

That's nothing to be ashamed of mate, we all have to start somewhere. :)

0 likes

how about the live version that they will be doing at the next gig we all meet up at?!?!?! :shrug:

0 likes

Originally posted by Jeff White how about the live version that they will be doing at the next gig we all meet up at?!?!?! :shrug:

How bout a meetup in SD, and we can do NO acting skits for each other; I can pretend to be Hooky in the TPK video, and Jeff, you can be Hooky's slim leg in True Faith

0 likes

The Community version! :thumb: :D :confused2:

0 likes

The Community version! :thumb: :D :confused2:

0 likes

We had a poll about this...

Mine is the Arthur Baker 1995 mix, but the poll was won by the original 12" single...

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗