Originally posted by five hates six
> Originally posted by The DoN> > > > Originally posted by five hates six> > Always remember my extreme disappointment on buying 'Substance' to find temptation had been re-recorded. The original is untouchable, and the Taras version 'rawks'.>
Indeed it must have been most disappointing to discover that the band had thought that after all those years had elapsed they could be so audacious as to think they could have actually IMPROVED as musicians
a horrifyingly shocking concept 
I agree that the 87 version is perhaps more 'polished', clearer and truer to the live version - however, does that make the track "better"?
The original, with 'real' sounding drums and the primitive synths/sequencers, and of course Barney's more deadpan delivery make it more appealing - the beauty of it is of course in the eye of the beholder!
The 87 version doesn't have any soul, it just feels very plastic to me. I played it yesterday and it reminded me how much I dislike it. The keyboard sequencer line sounds all wrong to me.
For me it has to be the original 12" followed by 98 folowed by original 7", last is 87.
I'll give you an example of the difference. A friend of mine was only familiar with 87 from the Trainspotting soundtrack and she wasn't impressed. I did her a compilation to educate her in the error of her ways and 98 was the first track. She listened to it on the way home from the pub and texted me straight away enthusing about it and how it wiped the floor with 87.