Skip to content

Shell-Shock - Pretty in Pink Version

Archived

17 replies · 424 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

I noticed that the stated time on my cassette and CD show as 6:04, yet every discography I've checked has Shell-Shock listed at a time of 6:40. Is there another PIP version I'm not aware of or is this an error? Thanks!

0 likes

According to TLV it's 6:40...

Now, is the New Order discography wrong? I can't say.

0 likes

Well,the version you talk about (with the extra verse) is only available on CD on the Pretty In Pink OST,so i guess whatever running time your CD says is right!

0 likes

Originally posted by Lake Effect I noticed that the stated time on my cassette and CD show as 6:04, yet every discography I've checked has Shell-Shock listed at a time of 6:40. Is there another PIP version I'm not aware of or is this an error? Thanks!

It could be a simple typo (in the Discography). The best way to get the right info is to simply time the track (or check your CD player...). I haven't done it myself yet as my music-collection is a little bit disorganized at the moment... :)

And yes Nick, the Discography has been wrong before. Not way wrong, just wrong :D

/TLV

0 likes

The original 12" of Shellshock (the extended mix, effectively) is 9:44, this 12" mix was clipped down to 6:28 for the Substance version. Both mixes are different to the Pretty in Pink version, which I suspect is the original at 6:04. There are noticable differences after the second (longer) chorus: an extra verse, guitar solo and faded ending. I like the Substance version best. My favourite New Order song... Despite what people often say on here about it.

Andy

0 likes

Originally posted by Mr Discography The original 12" of Shellshock (the extended mix, effectively) is 9:44, this 12" mix was clipped down to 6:28 for the Substance version. Both mixes are different to the Pretty in Pink version, which I suspect is the original at 6:04. There are noticable differences after the second (longer) chorus: an extra verse, guitar solo and faded ending. I like the Substance version best. My favourite New Order song... Despite what people often say on here about it.Andy

Indeed, Shellshock is one of my favorite NO songs, in any remix. Too bad few people really appreciate it.

0 likes

Originally posted by This blue-eyed boy that wants to be > Originally posted by Mr Discography> The original 12" of Shellshock (the extended mix, effectively) is 9:44, this 12" mix was clipped down to 6:28 for the Substance version. Both mixes are different to the Pretty in Pink version, which I suspect is the original at 6:04. There are noticable differences after the second (longer) chorus: an extra verse, guitar solo and faded ending. I like the Substance version best. My favourite New Order song... Despite what people often say on here about it.> > Andy

Indeed, Shellshock is one of my favorite NO songs, in any remix. Too bad few people really appreciate it.

I agree, Shellshock is still one of my favorite tracks, though it does sound a little dated now compared to other NO songs. I am a little biased though since Shellshock was the song that exposed me to, and got me hooked on New Order back in 86. I for one appreciate it.

0 likes

I've got a good soundcheck version, must have been a doddle to do live because the song basically plays itself. Gillian presses one button and that's it, save for a few vocals and a tiny bit of guitar from Mr Sumner...

0 likes

Shellshock sucks shocks.

0 likes

that's the way

0 likes

Originally posted by SPtwo Well,the version you talk about (with the extra verse) is only available on CD on the Pretty In Pink OST,so i guess whatever running time your CD says is right!

What about the version on Retro? AFAICT, the PiP version is a fade-out of the 6:28 Retro version. Or am I way off here?

/TLV

0 likes

Originally posted by TLV > Originally posted by SPtwo Well,the version you talk about (with the extra verse) is only available on CD on the Pretty In Pink OST,so i guess whatever running time your CD says is right!

What about the version on Retro? AFAICT, the PiP version is a fade-out of the 6:28 Retro version. Or am I way off here?

/TLV

The version on Retro is the same edit of the 12" that appears on Substance. The version on the Pretty in Pink is the original version.

0 likes

Originally posted by Andy The version on Retro is the same edit of the 12" that appears on Substance. The version on the Pretty in Pink is the original version.

Yepp. My bad. Sorry.

/TLV

0 likes

Originally posted by I don't want to be just a number in Society The real question is:WHERE IS MOLLY RINGWALD THESE DAYS ????????? :confused2:

Where are they now (April 2003) Starring in Broadway production of "Enchanted April" as Rose

0 likes

Originally posted by Spotnick > Originally posted by I don't want to be just a number in Society> The real question is:> > > WHERE IS MOLLY RINGWALD THESE DAYS ????????? :confused2:

Where are they now (April 2003) Starring in Broadway production of "Enchanted April" as Rose

At least she's doing something, unlike Jon Cryer and Andrew "Weekend at Bernie's" McCarthy.

0 likes

Originally posted by Resurrection Spider Shellshock sucks shocks.

It's up there with State Of The Nation.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗