Skip to content

Saville's Get Ready covers

Archived

15 replies · 446 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

some people say these are their favorite Saville covers, but I find Get Ready and singles to be the least interesting of his covers

so why do you like/ dislike?

so its a "bird", mildly sexual. so "get ready" for sexuality, but the red line is like a red stoplight across her naughty bits? then on Crystal she is taking off her pants, but you still have the red stripe? is this meant to imply censorship? or you can look but cant touch? then on "60 Miles an Hour" there is a yellow strip covering her breasts, indicting that the tits are not as extreme as the crotch, so you just get a yield yellow color for the softer core of the breasts?

just seems so cliched, but maybe thats the point. the camera in front of the camera was a total cliche by 2000. the ragged jeans seem sort of late 80ish. Get ready for New Order, but they are an old 80s cliche now so dont expect too much? maybe its a rip on New Order, and has a chick because New order would have never sold themselves with generic sexuality, so its a surprise, a deliberate leftfield move to shock

0 likes

and what about the Retro cover? .... seems as lazy as New Order was in putting together the box set. New Order tore down disco and set up a "New Order" in music? New Order is not really that significant in terms of the dance world.

Retro is white in contrast to the dark Heart and Soul box set, i guess it makes a nice contrast on the shelf, but the cover image is forgetable and sloppy for Saville IMO

0 likes

I got into new order while on a summer job in a record store in the get ready era. The posters for get ready were very....cool (i know that word is a pretty crappy one), and I initially liked to play "close range" in the shop.

I could say it was the get ready sleeve that really got me into new order. I dont think its at all that bad, or retro, or international, or Krafty either. Do people expect saville to keep on making silk screens, classical images, and modern text?

0 likes

but there was an interesting part about those covers, the coloured rectangle.

after the offical releases there was the someone like you 12". red background, white bar. really it was back to the saville notion of people could go into a record store and by a new order record without the name on the label.

i asked tony wilson in his ICA talk of a few years ago (in between total wankers asking the usual 'what was Ian like' questions for the millionth time) "was Peter Saville deconstrucing the logo to its most basic form or just taking the piss?". he preferred the former idea, and so do I.

0 likes

I find if I try to overanalyise New Order related stuff I get a terrible headache.

But I prefer the Get Ready covers to all the previous ones, except maybe the simplicity of Substance.

0 likes

Originally posted by MYOB I find if I try to overanalyise New Order related stuff I get a terrible headache.But I prefer the Get Ready covers to all the previous ones, except maybe the simplicity of Substance.

me too,people tend to pontificate the sleeves of saville,so be it.But to me it looks quite simple that,he was big mates with tony wilson,and they have both done very nicely thankyou,out of new orders brilliance.its leeches like this guy that sunk factory.i hear he gets paid ridiculous amonts of money,for his "so what" sleeves.its the music that matters,thats the art,when it comes to new order

0 likes

Right from the off NO had a design element. It made them different and somehow more enlightened. The Saville Exhibition last year was fantastic. I agreee it is too easy to over complicate but also to under appreciate.

0 likes

I liked the artwork for "Get Ready", I thought it was the most oh..provocative or gutsy than any NO cover designs. A waif-like girl seemingly lost with a touch of sexuality really is striking from the standpoint of Non-NO fans will buy it from the cover itself. Saville's past designs always seem to coincide with NO's musical style with his artsy flair, so it was more intelligent design not anything too random "by design." Get Ready artwork is wonderful; music sucked.

"Republic" artwork a bit mainstream (My least fav) but music was far from it- it was vintage, timeless New Order.

0 likes

Originally posted by Clockwork C I got into new order while on a summer job in a record store in the get ready era. The posters for get ready were very....cool (i know that word is a pretty crappy one), and I initially liked to play "close range" in the shop.I could say it was the get ready sleeve that really got me into new order. I dont think its at all that bad, or retro, or international, or Krafty either. Do people expect saville to keep on making silk screens, classical images, and modern text?

Krafty is a very good cover IMO, but Retro and International are abominable. An eagle and a disco ball? :thumbdown: Also International just looks lazily slopped together.

0 likes

Yeah, "International" cover was half-assed.

I love Peter Saville's designs and I think he should have some credit over the years with NO's success. Most of his artwork has always been clean, intelligent and sometimes edgy.

His work always seem to standout from the other guys The Cure or DM. The Cure's album covers always seem look like a big blob of crap and DM's covers are just simply....dark.

0 likes

I liked the 'Get Ready' design idea so much that I got my girlfriend to pose for a series of these

<~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

0 likes

I think the Get Ready covers are mediocre, but certainly better than Republic. Republic is horribly splashy, and I dislike the melding of images as well as the images in itself. Maybe I was expecting more out of Saville in 1993, but looking back, I still dislike the Republic album and singles covers. I do like that they were not predictable though...

I do have to say that one thing I have really liked about all the New Order and Joy Division covers is the consistency in theme between the albums and the singles. I like the futurism of the Movement era, the color bars of the PCL era, the monolithic walls of the Brotherhood covers, the acid-colours of Technique, etc. I like that the bar in the Get Ready covers appear in all the singles, as if it was the monolith of 2001. I'm just rambling, I know, but I figured since we were on the subject of covers...

0 likes

Saville has always been very different from each set of artwork to the next, while always keeping his personality.... maybe there is no "deep" meaning but he always has some idea or style in mind.

certainly the Get Ready pics are very intentionally non- New Order. the line bar is graphically deconstructed (as said) to the simplist form, like a traffic sign or signal that could be understood without language... red, green, yellow the only color.

0 likes

I remember when Get Ready came out and the CD was on display in a local record store as a new release. I thought the cover was kind of cool - the camera, the black&white photo, Nicolette Kreibitz - but everyone else in the store seemed to think she was guy.

0 likes

I thought the get ready cover was a bit dull, it doesn't jump out at you like technique or the best of, the bars didn't add anything and didn't seem to mean anything unlike the code on PC&L.

I think savilles work is very much a part of the whole NO thing, I like something to look at while listening to the music, and saville normally has an angle on things others just don't get, I hope that WFTSC sees him getting back on form, the krafty cover looks OK, slightly kraftwerk-ish, maybe the cover came before the title.

As for saville just making money off the back of NO and being party to the collapse of factory, saville designed covers for other acts including peter gabriel and had retired when NO asked him to do get ready. NO, Happy Mondays, manchester gangsters, the Hacienda and Ben Kelly (interior designer) all had a hand in the collapse of factory, but ultimately it was Tony Wilsons bad management.

0 likes

I just have to comment towards an earlier comment claiming that New Order aren't that influencial to the dance world. How do you figure? Straight faced, dead seriously, how do you figure!?

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗