Ok. So we have established that it is ok for Sumner to dance around like an idiot, since it is endearing and fun. And what matters is that they are having a good time, so we should be having a good time.
And, thus, I return to my 2001 argument that Rock the Shack is a fine song, cause it was clearly them having a blast in the studio, having a fun time recording a rocker....
At the time, I was castigated, for having the poor taste to even mention Rock the Shack... and I was told pretty much "it isn't fair for them to be having a good time at our the cd buying public's expense" - and that a crappy song RUINS their entire history...
Well, I am trying to reconcile how I was wrong then, and I am wrong now?
On the one hand, back then, I thought it was cool they were having a fun time in the studio, releasing RtS... back then I learned from you all and am told to take them more seriously, that they are a SERIOUS band and shouldn't put such crap on their lps, so I join the nool serious fan club and bitch about how silly Bernard looks dancing, and I get in trouble...
can someone please help this loser Tarbox out??? :)