I wonder if there is a solution to the mystic classphoto in the photo-section of this site (Link). I think I spotted Hooky, but I can't makeout Barney...
(The photo was bigger once...)
67 replies · 1,769 views
I wonder if there is a solution to the mystic classphoto in the photo-section of this site (Link). I think I spotted Hooky, but I can't makeout Barney...
(The photo was bigger once...)
LOL! You're right. Perhaps it's little Barney top row second on the right. What do you think?
Looks too old to me... Could be the 3rd right from little Hooky... But looks as if he has jug ears...
Bere, I can't see since the photo is too small. Could you enlarge that boy you think it's Barney and post it here?
Oops you already did it. I don't think it's him. ![]()
Bere, for some strange reason, I cannot open my email right now. It says "cannot find server". Will try again later.
Thanks, Bere! They are all so very funny
I guess you were right about that boy sitting next to Hooky. ;)
Bere wrote:
Could it be that easy?
The answer is yes. Now prove you're a real expert spotting Terry Mason on that picture.
Hank Wiseass© wrote: I wonder, has the lad to the left of Barney seen The Ring?
Someone has to find out if he died 7 days after the making of the Photo... ![]()
Bere wrote: OK I googled him... I now know who he is... But I don't know what he looks like...
Okay, I'll give you a hint: this is Terry Mason in 1988.

Bere wrote: OK Thx... Give me 30 minutes...
You don't have a better photo?
That's the only picture of him that I have. I could scan it again, but I doubt it will be any help.
Bere wrote: I find no pic in the web... Mystery Man... It's hard to tell from his side-face...
Another hint: he's not far from Bernard.
Bere wrote: First guess... Seems to be a red hair guy, too..
Nope. Read my second hint again.
One Brain wrote:
Another question... Does anyone know what Hooky's size is? Looks like a dwarf...
His body height? His body size... How tall is he? However you say: "Weiss jemand wie gross er ist?" in english.
![]()
He's a gardener?
By the way congrats for beating germany at eurovision yesterday
. Was not heavy to do so. We always send those who can't sing...
LOL! He's not a gardener, just doing something with that patio thing in his garden. :D Don't mention Eurovision please, it's so embarrasing to hear all those crappy songs there. ![]()
It's unbelievable how they look similar to the early Joy Division and New Order days, especially Bernard, just looks like in 1981... Hooky is short, but not as you'd figure from that picture, probably Terry Mason is very tall (though he looks rather different from other pictures I've seen (or maybe it was Tony Tabac in those).
Bere wrote:
Could it be that easy?
It's them alright... that photo was sent to us by Little Boy Lost, who is in the picture...
Spotnick wrote: It's them alright... that photo was sent to us by Little Boy Lost, who is in the picture...
Err... Surely you meant "a very small boy".
One Brain wrote:
Spotnick wrote: It's them alright... that photo was sent to us by Little Boy Lost, who is in the picture...
Err... Surely you meant "a very small boy".
![]()
What did I say again? ![]()
Sorry, just got up.. should avoid to post then ![]()
NObabe wrote: LOL! He's not a gardener, just doing something with that patio thing in his garden. :D Don't mention Eurovision please, it's so embarrasing to hear all those crappy songs there.
It's always fun when germany is crappiest like yesterday
. Why didn't NO start for Great Britain? "Jetstream" could have won easily...
Mick Aneworderfan wrote: It's unbelievable how they look similar to the early Joy Division and New Order days, especially Bernard, just looks like in 1981...
I think Hooky's hasn't changed yet. He was easy to find ;)...
I had big problems to recognize Barney...
Bere wrote: Anthony = Tony Wilson? Peter = Hooky?
nope.
ok, now, which hipster has morris as a kid?
NObabe wrote: Why bother? Morris probably looked just the same.
I'd like to see a proof of that.
Bere wrote:
NObabe wrote: Why bother? Morris probably looked just the same.
I'd like to see a proof of that.
Sorry! No luck with searching ... ![]()