Skip to content

The morning after the pantomime horse the night before.

Archived

64 replies · 2,037 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

DoN wrote:

The Man Up North wrote: Great to see Dawn Zee there in person -- great voice, great look! I like her! The only problem is that she's a REAL singer and often burries Barney's voice. Sometimes Bernard will force his voice to make it louder in order to keep up with Dawn, and that makes him sing completely off-key every time. :shrug:

One question: anyone know why the band cut the electro bassline on Krafty ???? It was replaced with Hooky playing his bass over all the tune, as if the song came from Brotherhood. Not bad, but I prefer with the sequenced line on...

You had to feel a bit sorry for her when she was singing the correct words and nicely in tune while Barney was shouting something completely different:lol:

Dawn must have the patience of a saint to perform with New Order. She would be perfectly entitled to give a few evil stares and scournful comments inbetween songs, to Barney, Hooky and Phil.

Glastonbury is the first time Ive seen Hooky have a shocker. His bass was all over the place, both with bum notes and tuned up incorrectly.

0 likes

Hank Wiseass© wrote: "Tarby". Arf.

(Copyright) Shug! :thumb:

0 likes

NO Regret wrote:

Glastonbury is the first time Ive seen Hooky have a shocker. His bass was all over the place, both with bum notes and tuned up incorrectly.

You weren't at Finsbury then three years ago? Don't rely on the DVD for memories - it's been post-produced to clean up the sound. 60 miles an hour was atrocious at Finsbury!

I have never seen or heard a gig where there hasn't been at least one bum note from Hooky. Not even in the early 80s. Whole songs in the wrong key, songs changing key part way through, a particularly weird Ceremony at Paradiso in 84 where he changes key just after Barney has changed his key to suit the one Hooky is playing.....the man's a legend. Forget Lovejoy, Hooky is the real legend!

0 likes

NO Regret wrote:

Glastonbury is the first time Ive seen Hooky have a shocker. His bass was all over the place, both with bum notes and tuned up incorrectly.

You weren't at Finsbury then three years ago? Don't rely on the DVD for memories - it's been post-produced to clean up the sound. 60 miles an hour was atrocious at Finsbury!

I have never seen or heard a gig where there hasn't been at least one bum note from Hooky. Not even in the early 80s. Whole songs in the wrong key, songs changing key part way through, a particularly weird Ceremony at Paradiso in 84 where he changes key just after Barney has changed his key to suit the one Hooky is playing.....the man's a legend. Forget Lovejoy, Hooky is the real legend!

0 likes

oldmonkey wrote:

NO Regret wrote:

Glastonbury is the first time Ive seen Hooky have a shocker. His bass was all over the place, both with bum notes and tuned up incorrectly.

You weren't at Finsbury then three years ago? Don't rely on the DVD for memories - it's been post-produced to clean up the sound. 60 miles an hour was atrocious at Finsbury!

I have never seen or heard a gig where there hasn't been at least one bum note from Hooky. Not even in the early 80s. Whole songs in the wrong key, songs changing key part way through, a particularly weird Ceremony at Paradiso in 84 where he changes key just after Barney has changed his key to suit the one Hooky is playing.....the man's a legend. Forget Lovejoy, Hooky is the real legend!

So good you posted it twice?! I'm wondering just how good the memory is of a lot of whingers here?! Is there some vicious rumour going around that New Order were once pitch perfect, and we just missed those gigs?! They've always played a little off-key, Barney's always made up the lyrics (in the days before autocue), etc, etc.

On the Bass God theme, Hooky has actually completely butchered WFTSC approximately, um, 10 times out of 10 when they've played it live this year. Absolute ripped it to shreds the second he comes in. Not sure it's entirely his fault though. I think, like the rest of us, he's probably worried Barney can't carry that initial beautiful vocal so creates his own little diversion to deflect the attention away from Mr Sumner!!

0 likes

At least Barney is singing the second line of the chorus now, he's managed to shorten his breather from the original four lines (as per the French TV debacle) to just the first line now.

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote: On the Bass God theme, Hooky has actually completely butchered WFTSC approximately, um, 10 times out of 10 when they've played it live this year. Absolute ripped it to shreds the second he comes in. Not sure it's entirely his fault though. I think, like the rest of us, he's probably worried Barney can't carry that initial beautiful vocal so creates his own little diversion to deflect the attention away from Mr Sumner!!

Sorry, but I have to defend Barney in this case. Anyone heard the Glasto webcast of WFTSC? In this case it's good that the bass is a bit louder in the mix, so you can actually hear, note by note, what Hooky is playing. And that has absolutely nothing to do with music, let alone a bass line in the conventional sense. NOBODY can sing to that even in roughly a correct tune.

0 likes

can somebody please fill me in on this pantomine horse thing because I havent a clue. I dont really have time searching through the site. Im having a really hetic week with a wedding to attend, and a death in the family(my 92 yr old uncle). Both are quite a bit of distance to travel too.

Shug, could you help a brotha out?

0 likes

The Man Up North wrote: Great to see Dawn Zee there in person -- great voice, great look! I like her! The only problem is that she's a REAL singer and often burries Barney's voice. Sometimes Bernard will force his voice to make it louder in order to keep up with Dawn, and that makes him sing completely off-key every time. :shrug:

One question: anyone know why the band cut the electro bassline on Krafty ???? It was replaced with Hooky playing his bass over all the tune, as if the song came from Brotherhood. Not bad, but I prefer with the sequenced line on...

Dawn is a great backing singer and carries Barnie through a lot. I Like her intro to crystal, its a great opener and she sets the mood. She looked a bit miffed when Hooky kinda doubled up on her mic and "sang" like a drunken navvy. Was Hookys bass on a transmitter? If so, thats some range. His walk to the front of the crowd was a superb gesture. On the Panto Horse note, I reckon the band must regret it a bit. A good measure of its popularity is that it was never mentioned as a "highlight" by the media. If WIM had been dropped from the set and theyd finished with Blue Monday as planned, those BBC3 chaps wouldve been fawning all over them. Apart from WIM it was a good gig

0 likes

Hello!

I thought Hooky was appalling! Was he unable to tune his bass before Love will tear us apart? Were they really going to refuse to play it or was that a wierd joke?

I couldn't work out what was going on, they looked like they'd had a massive argument or something.

I was a bit worse for wear, but I'm convinced the crowd booed as they left the stage - can anyone confirm this?

Gutted, we were really looking forwards to seeing them. It was my first time and my girlfriend was so excited about them. At least they played BLT, although not the version she wanted apparantly.

0 likes

_Cush wrote: I was a bit worse for wear, but I'm convinced the crowd booed as they left the stage - can anyone confirm this?

Nobody booed.

0 likes

szwajkos technique wrote: can somebody please fill me in on this pantomine horse thing because I havent a clue. I dont really have time searching through the site. Im having a really hetic week with a wedding to attend, and a death in the family(my 92 yr old uncle). Both are quite a bit of distance to travel too.

Shug, could you help a brotha out?

Barney introduced Keith Allen on stage (dressed in a Matador costume) riding on top of a pantomime horse :nonono:

Pantomime Horse : Picture yersel dogging a bird except it's yer head up the arse of the person in front and both of you are wearing a daft looking costume which is supposed to look like a horse.

Google "Rentaghost"

I thank you:D

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote:

_Cush wrote: I was a bit worse for wear, but I'm convinced the crowd booed as they left the stage - can anyone confirm this?

Nobody booed.

that's strange, because I just spoke to a mate who was at the same gig, but at the opposite side to me, who said there were quite a few boos

0 likes

_Cush wrote:

Al Jarvis wrote:

_Cush wrote: I was a bit worse for wear, but I'm convinced the crowd booed as they left the stage - can anyone confirm this?

Nobody booed.

that's strange, because I just spoke to a mate who was at the same gig, but at the opposite side to me, who said there were quite a few boos

Those were actually The Vikings calling for some BOOZE.

0 likes

Shug wrote:

szwajkos technique wrote: can somebody please fill me in on this pantomine horse thing because I havent a clue. I dont really have time searching through the site. Im having a really hetic week with a wedding to attend, and a death in the family(my 92 yr old uncle). Both are quite a bit of distance to travel too.

Shug, could you help a brotha out?

Barney introduced Keith Allen on stage (dressed in a Matador costume) riding on top of a pantomime horse :nonono:

Pantomime Horse : Picture yersel dogging a bird except it's yer head up the arse of the person in front and both of you are wearing a daft looking costume which is supposed to look like a horse.

Google "Rentaghost" Just like S.technique I was wondering What the fook you lot were talking about re. the panto horse now thanx to the Shugster my curiousity is now satisfied(though the mental image is somewhat disturbing!!)

I thank you:D

0 likes

Watched the live stream at about 6am here in Oz. Good connection, no cut-outs at all. I was amazed at the breakdown of camera shots (Barney 85%, Hooky 10%, Steve 3%, Dawn 1.5%, Phil .5%).

I thought it was an embarrassment, not as much as the fluffed lines at Hyde Park, but have our expectations become so low that we applaud a performance like that? The new songs sound rotten live I think.

As for the Panto horse, her vocals in Jetstream were just awful.

0 likes

_Cush wrote:

Al Jarvis wrote:

_Cush wrote: I was a bit worse for wear, but I'm convinced the crowd booed as they left the stage - can anyone confirm this?

Nobody booed.

that's strange, because I just spoke to a mate who was at the same gig, but at the opposite side to me, who said there were quite a few boos

Which side were you on?! I was on the right hand side (dur) and no one boo'ed there. Why the fcuk would anyone boo, especially at the end?! If you don't like someone, you boo continuously surely?! I fcuking would.

Interesting first post though. Coming on to a New Order messageboard asking if anyone can confirm whether they were boo'ed at Glastonbury?! Are you an infiltrator from alt.music.new-order?!

For the record, they were boo'ed when they first played Glastonbury, cos it was a hippy/rock festival in them days and Led Zep or someone were headlining. Christ, why didn't they just give up then, eh, and get proper jobs??

0 likes

brade27 wrote: I thought it was an embarrassment, not as much as the fluffed lines at Hyde Park, but have our expectations become so low that we applaud a performance like that? The new songs sound rotten live I think.

You're gonna have to point me in the direction of what-you-consider-to-be a 'good' New Order performance then?! Just so that we can compare notes. 511 or 316, perhaps? I think you'll find they'll have been overdubbed and edited to the band's tastes.

New Order have always been rather ramshackle live, when are people gonna realise that?!

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote:

brade27 wrote: I thought it was an embarrassment, not as much as the fluffed lines at Hyde Park, but have our expectations become so low that we applaud a performance like that? The new songs sound rotten live I think.

You're gonna have to point me in the direction of what-you-consider-to-be a 'good' New Order performance then?! Just so that we can compare notes. 511 or 316, perhaps? I think you'll find they'll have been overdubbed and edited to the band's tastes.

New Order have always been rather ramshackle live, when are people gonna realise that?!

If people expect NO to be so fooking note-perfect they(disappointed fans) should, to partly quote NO from Perfect Kiss "just stay at home playing with their pleasure zones" with the greatest hits on as further orgasm inducement in the background. After all, the bum notes and dodgy vocals prove that not EVERY part of their gigs comes out/off of a HDD/tape/sequencer/whatever. They are human, not mythical Olympian beings. They eat, drink, piss & fart as much as any of us do(maybe more so at times, depending on what's been on the menu in the past 24 hours!). End of rant.

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote: For the record, they were boo'ed when they first played Glastonbury, cos it was a hippy/rock festival in them days and Led Zep or someone were headlining.

*Hawkwind! Those fookin hippies just wanted those bufoons and couldn't enjoy a performance from such an innovative and exciting band... :nonono:

Christ, why didn't they just give up then, eh, and get proper jobs??

*Glad they didn't! :thumb:

0 likes

One Brain wrote:

Tarbox23 wrote: God, what a shambolic set... I think they may have played about 4 minutes decently out of the entire hour....

It was embarrassing. I told everyone I know here in the US to watch it cause it was free online....

What a joke. Anyone with any objectivity will admit it was a horrible performance. I know the insane fans who cannot admit new order EVER play poorly, and folks who were at the show investing in hours of mud, will not be able to admit it, but get serious. This was a sad day for new order.

I suppose after this, will be all the posts about how endearing and better new order are when they suck, and why this makes new order the best rock band ever, because they are so unpredictable. Like Joy Division, they have angelic highs but hellish lows.

Well, just as we love them for their high moments, we can only be fair and despise them for their lows.

I think Hook, who I love, missed more notes than hit em on the first three songs. Every time I thought maybe they were getting a footing, they would blow it somehow.

Which was really sad, because I was psyched they had Dawn Z there... she was the only one onstage with any talent that night. Surely not Ana... how did she get a singing gig???

This shambolic gig, and the downward trend lately, is just a sign to move along, seek spectacle from other sources for the immediate future. Aj Wells was right on so many levels. And wrong too. BOTTOM LINE: What really is there to chat about new order in the next few months? They are tired and are about to take time off themselves and prep the next lp, maybe. They made their money for 2005 and will not be making much news until 2006....

Anyway, this is my last post for awhile. Off to summer things and life and other bands. I am sure you are all crying the predicted tears of deepest pain at this news!

Cheers fellas! See ya when the next lp comes out....

-Tarbox

Could you summarize your post so I don't have to read all that?

:laugh: Such are the confessions of a drama queen :)

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote: 511 or 316, perhaps? I think you'll find they'll have been overdubbed and edited to the band's tastes.

You know that Al or are you just guessing? That's a pretty big claim.

God, the last thing I want is an airbrushed version of New Order. I love them warts and all. It's just that the warts are getting bigger...

0 likes

brade27 wrote:

Al Jarvis wrote: 511 or 316, perhaps? I think you'll find they'll have been overdubbed and edited to the band's tastes.

You know that Al or are you just guessing? That's a pretty big claim.

God, the last thing I want is an airbrushed version of New Order. I love them warts and all. It's just that the warts are getting bigger...

It's a fact... on 511, check it out, on Regret Hooky is changing his bass and you can actually hear the bass while he's doing it.

The DVD has been overdubbed to sound "perfect"... if that is possible.

0 likes

Spotnick wrote:

The DVD has been overdubbed to sound "perfect"... if that is possible.

No problem with that. So we got Still... :)

0 likes

Spotnick wrote:

brade27 wrote:

Al Jarvis wrote: 511 or 316, perhaps? I think you'll find they'll have been overdubbed and edited to the band's tastes.

You know that Al or are you just guessing? That's a pretty big claim.

God, the last thing I want is an airbrushed version of New Order. I love them warts and all. It's just that the warts are getting bigger...

It's a fact... on 511, check it out, on Regret Hooky is changing his bass and you can actually hear the bass while he's doing it.

The DVD has been overdubbed to sound "perfect"... if that is possible.

Wow, that's crap beyond belief. :thumbdown:

0 likes

brade27 wrote:

Wow, that's crap beyond belief. :thumbdown:

Apparently it is business as usual in the music industry...

We had a huge debate when somebody claimed New Order were miming when he saw Hooky taking off his bass and the bass still played... ;)

But bootlegs shows something else....

0 likes

You're gonna have to point me in the direction of what-you-consider-to-be a 'good' New Order performance then?! Just so that we can compare notes. 511 or 316, perhaps?

Reading 1993 - perfect

0 likes

Guilty Partner wrote:

You're gonna have to point me in the direction of what-you-consider-to-be a 'good' New Order performance then?! Just so that we can compare notes. 511 or 316, perhaps?

Reading 1993 - perfect

In what way? Loads of us from here were there and it was like a wake. I don't think any of the gigs were that good, per se, in 1993, and they did the exact same setlist from the US onwards. Reading 93 promised a lot, and failed to deliver. Went out with a fizzle instead of a bang. For a 'final' gig Reading 89 was infinitely better.

0 likes

Just think musically it was much better than anything I've heard live

0 likes

Guilty Partner wrote: Just think musically it was much better than anything I've heard live

Oh right, gotcha. I don't think it was a good gig, per se, but I guess they'd perfected the setlist by then!

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗