Skip to content

an end to New Order

Archived

15 replies · 809 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

if you had to choose a perfect end in NO´s history, which year would it be?

Closed
  • 1980 2 (4%)
  • 1981 1 (2%)
  • 1982 0 (0%)
  • 1983 0 (0%)
  • 1984 1 (2%)
  • 1985 0 (0%)
  • 1986 0 (0%)
  • 1987 0 (0%)
  • 1988 0 (0%)
  • 1989 12 (21%)
  • 1990 4 (7%)
  • 1993 6 (11%)
  • 1998 1 (2%)
  • 2000 0 (0%)
  • 2001 0 (0%)
  • 2002 1 (2%)
  • 2003 0 (0%)
  • 2004 0 (0%)
  • 2005 2 (4%)
  • like Procession says: "there is no end to this" 27 (47%)

57 votes · voting closed

i´m not particulary fond of polls but this one i think might be interesting. all my life i´ve been hearing fans saying "NewOrder should´ve split up back in (X year), from that year on it has never been the same cause that was the highest point of their career", etc etc etc.

so my question is: if you had to choose an end to NO, which one would it be and why? many ones think 89 was the year after editing Technique, a great album, when the Haçienda was at its peak, Factory still alive, no World In Motion yet, no moving to London, not getting fat/old/whatever. others think Blue Monday was a bad thing so they´d choose 82, right after Temptation was released. and others think JD was their peak so after Ian died was the perfect time. anyway, you get the picture. please tell why you choose the year. this could be interesting.

personally i can´t make up my mind about this since i still enjoy their records. but at the same time i´m skeptic about if they really have anything else to offer and i mean something REALLY interesting.

0 likes

Nah, long may they reign. While they are putting out songs like WFTSC and Turn (right up there with their best ever material IMHO), it would be downright silly to say that they have outstayed their welcome.

If they had packed it in in '89, people should be aware that this means that Regret, Crystal, Primitive notion, Who's Joe etc etc wouldn't exist - and I don't like the sound of that idea too much.

Everyone gets old, but it doesn't always go hand in hand with getting crap. Far from it. CTB :bear:

0 likes

In my mind, and counting all of Joy Division days, NewOrder are absolutely, perfectly ACE from '77 to '93 ! Nevertheless, their comeback in 2001 is such a fresh surprise (in the form) + the astounding single that is 'Here to Stay' and the very good new album : that I must say : 'Dreams never end'... It's only with this present album that I think and feel for the very first time that, even though its sheer qualities, it's more of a good vintage album than any real surprise or pushing further, but you never know what they could come up with in the near future... Still, there's no one else quite like them either (except perhaps WIRE).

0 likes
  1. It wasn't their peak year for me (for that I'd choose 1984 or 1985) but it saw the release Technique, their last album that didn't have any filler on it. It also saw them still changing their setlists, albeit the variation had gotten lesser. Not that they haven't made quality tunes since then, even a couple of instant classics have emerged from their instruments but there's been an increasing run-of-the-mill factor involved in NO albums post-Technique. And sure as hell I will always prefer ye olde sequencers to the backing tapes, and the often-variating setlists to the current rarely-changing ones. And pretty much everything since Technique has been but a mere footnote in their career in the public minds as well.

Well, I don't really want them to stop now either ;) but a part of me would have wanted to think of Order as a band that made very little musical missteps and sub-par (to their standards) material.

0 likes

Another vote for 1989!

0 likes

Never want them to end; but I'd choose '93 as it would've made sense with Factory collapsing and everything; although that may have been seen as ending on a low note... '89 would be the choice for ending on a high.

0 likes

Okay, who's the funny guy who voted for 1980?

0 likes

I voted for '81 simply because that was the last time I bought something by NO and loved it immediately - since then it's been a bit of a mould process. Admittedly, I loved Brotherhood and Perfect Kiss and Run2 and loved seeing them live a few years ago and I reckon life is just a bit better because they are still around but what the heck, vote early - cause some ripples.

:read:

0 likes

How longs a piece of string? If theyre still making decent stuff let them carry on. I know ill have to run for cover after this comment but i think they should stop touring...

...Ok,theyre great live-but one day well wake up and they`ll be the Rolling Stones! Plus i think now,i would rather have another couple of albums before they call it a day more than a few good nights out.

0 likes

I believe they hit a peak in 89 with Technique but don't consider this to mean that they should have packed up there and then.

Even post-peak they have created a lot of beautiful music, so for me, there is no need to prescribe an end.

I shall let them decide and hopefully enjoy what they care to throw our way in the meantime.

0 likes

1989, then. it´s the only date i could think myself full of NO. from then on it was like a bonus really. not that i don´t thank them for that!

0 likes

Never. Even watered down New order is better than nothing.

0 likes

Wasim wrote: Never. Even watered down New order is better than nothing.

perfectly true...

0 likes

Wasim wrote: Never. Even watered down New order is better than nothing.

Here, here!

0 likes

1985 was their peak for me, but they've put out quite a few good songs since then. 1993 would've been a subdued ending with how shit Republic is, but whatever.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗