Grammy Awards

Archived

38 replies · 1,513 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

← Back to Digital Republic

Showing posts 31–39 of 39 ↑ First post Latest post ↓

8 Feb 2006, 22:35

they lost to chem. bros.

next question please.

8 Feb 2006, 23:17

It was to late, didn't watch the show ! So we loose :\ohwell:

9 Feb 2006, 00:38

well giaue is a pretty mediocre song and i never thought it had any real chance of winning. i mean, turn would have been so much more bawesome

9 Feb 2006, 02:14

The chances of a guilt release are now less than zero... paradoxically the chances of winning this award would have been higher in the first place IF the damn track had been released earlier!

:banghead:

Still... at least we have some rehashed remixes on vinyl to look forward to...

:banghead:

9 Feb 2006, 02:24

the grammys are for industry gobshites and ring piece lickers. end of.

9 Feb 2006, 02:34

J.A.K wrote: the grammys are for industry gobshites and ring piece lickers. end of.

what wisdom have you for us next Kershaw?

Beer gets you drunk? The sea is salty (hardly surprising when whales ejaculate in the 10's of gallons)

Are you even allowed over here on the sane side? ;)

9 Feb 2006, 02:38

Did Mariah Carey win anything? Can't stand the bitch.

9 Feb 2006, 02:55

Steve Campbell wrote:

J.A.K wrote: the grammys are for industry gobshites and ring piece lickers. end of.

what wisdom have you for us next Kershaw?

Beer gets you drunk? The sea is salty (hardly surprising when whales ejaculate in the 10's of gallons)

Are you even allowed over here on the sane side? ;)

the sane side?? err...from a belfastardite? :nod:

9 Feb 2006, 04:53

i just cant help but think how this thread might have changed it's tone had new order picked up the award instead of the chems.

what difference does it make really...