78 replies · 2,577 views
Sorry Missy, I was wrong, I shouldn't have taken the piss in the reply to you about what the rest of the band are doing.
The short answer is that we don't know what they are doing. Phil was rumoured to be working with his old Marion colleague Jaime Harding again, and Steve is probably enjoying a quiet life without any inter-band quarrels.
My offer of getting you a signed ticket or something from Friday night was genuine, I'll see what I can do.
why on earth have you decided to apologise?! 
she should have taken the hint long time ago, talk about being thick skinned 
Let's face it, missy banging on about how she's the self confirmed "Hooky's Biggest Fan" at every opportunity was always gonna bring a bit of ridicule! Then she threatened to "bring a complaint" against the entire website 
it doesn't seem that we're the ones lacking a sense of humour.
It's always the least self-aware folk on this website who make the biggest noises about victimisation and never stop to wonder why they're having the piss taken out of them 
We all know BIGINOIL is Hooky's favourite concubine anyway 
oldmonkey wrote: Sorry Missy, I was wrong, I shouldn't have taken the piss in the reply to you about what the rest of the band are doing.
The short answer is that we don't know what they are doing. Phil was rumoured to be working with his old Marion colleague Jaime Harding again, and Steve is probably enjoying a quiet life without any inter-band quarrels.
My offer of getting you a signed ticket or something from Friday night was genuine, I'll see what I can do.
Nice touch. I dont think we should make personal attacks on one another. Were all fans of the band and should be pulling in the same direction. This is a great website and surely every contribution is worthy (but please no more 1963 threads!).
I hope your apology is accepted and we can move on.
I read the ad I am going to answer it back that I have never done anything to New Order fans all I wanted to do is give my support to Peter I did have happy memories after the dj gig I had the chance to spend time with him and chat a little with and show my collection that I had on him that I have collected over the years I am sorry too, but like I said I liked Hooky since day one and had happy memories of him that I want to hold dear to me for a very long time. He never had a problem with me meeting him after he wanted too and told the bloke working at the club. If Peter had a problem with me he would of told me there, but he didn't and he managed to sign my things for me I am a big fan of his and there is somethings I want to keep very private of my meeting. Ya this issue is hitting me really hard it's bad enough I have for years been battling depression and going in the hospital and all my life never had anything happy in my life a bad family loosing my jobs try coping with life that I had and it's not easy ya I am in tears all I ever wanted to do is give Peter the support as he isn't getting younger. I can't stand being sick all the time and 2 close calls with cancer. Missy for all of you keep supporting New Order
Johnny wrote: You think you've had a hard life ,missy? what about poor old me? I've NEVER met Hooky
a bit harsh, eh. :\ohwell:
And i've never met Jonathan either .Even though he most probably past through my town on the train last summer when he was in England .Thanks for stopping by ,J :finger:
oh well,, time for bed said zeberdee.
its been such a strange day with some strange threads ,
missy wrote: I read the ad I am going to answer it back that I have never done anything to New Order fans all I wanted to do is give my support to Peter I did have happy memories after the dj gig I had the chance to spend time with him and chat a little with and show my collection that I had on him that I have collected over the years I am sorry too, but like I said I liked Hooky since day one and had happy memories of him that I want to hold dear to me for a very long time. He never had a problem with me meeting him after he wanted too and told the bloke working at the club. If Peter had a problem with me he would of told me there, but he didn't and he managed to sign my things for me I am a big fan of his and there is somethings I want to keep very private of my meeting. Ya this issue is hitting me really hard it's bad enough I have for years been battling depression and going in the hospital and all my life never had anything happy in my life a bad family loosing my jobs try coping with life that I had and it's not easy ya I am in tears all I ever wanted to do is give Peter the support as he isn't getting younger. I can't stand being sick all the time and 2 close calls with cancer. Missy for all of you keep supporting New Order
Honey depression is a horrible illness but a sense of humor really does help to fight it.
His Holiness, The Pope wrote:
ally wrote:
Is Hooky "collaborating" with Andy Bell now?
No just lending some much needed hair!
i've met hooky, i,ve even seen him with his kecks off
(some of those dressing rooms were very small)
Marc wrote: Tim has upset me many a-time, do I get some signed stuff too?
You as well?.. I thought it was only a small minority 
It takes a man to admit he's wrong. Nice one Tim, you were too harsh.
Jed and Ally - start admitting, babies
oldmonkey wrote: Sorry Missy, I was wrong, I shouldn't have taken the piss in the reply to you about what the rest of the band are doing.
The short answer is that we don't know what they are doing. Phil was rumoured to be working with his old Marion colleague Jaime Harding again, and Steve is probably enjoying a quiet life without any inter-band quarrels.
My offer of getting you a signed ticket or something from Friday night was genuine, I'll see what I can do.
i feel love in the air!!! 
Burt Reynolds wrote:
Marc wrote: Tim has upset me many a-time, do I get some signed stuff too?
You as well?.. I thought it was only a small minority
I was kidding in hoping to get some goodies. 
oldmonkey wrote: Sorry Missy, I was wrong, I shouldn't have taken the piss in the reply to you about what the rest of the band are doing.
The short answer is that we don't know what they are doing. Phil was rumoured to be working with his old Marion colleague Jaime Harding again, and Steve is probably enjoying a quiet life without any inter-band quarrels.
My offer of getting you a signed ticket or something from Friday night was genuine, I'll see what I can do.
Why do I hear Kiss' 'I was made for loving you babe' playing?
NO Regret wrote:
oldmonkey wrote: Sorry Missy, I was wrong, I shouldn't have taken the piss in the reply to you about what the rest of the band are doing.
The short answer is that we don't know what they are doing. Phil was rumoured to be working with his old Marion colleague Jaime Harding again, and Steve is probably enjoying a quiet life without any inter-band quarrels.
My offer of getting you a signed ticket or something from Friday night was genuine, I'll see what I can do.
Nice touch. I dont think we should make personal attacks on one another. Were all fans of the band and should be pulling in the same direction. This is a great website and surely every contribution is worthy (but please no more 1963 threads!).
Isn't that supposed to be about Lee Harvey Oswald or something?
oldmonkey wrote: Sorry Missy, I was wrong, I shouldn't have taken the piss in the reply to you about what the rest of the band are doing.
The short answer is that we don't know what they are doing. Phil was rumoured to be working with his old Marion colleague Jaime Harding again, and Steve is probably enjoying a quiet life without any inter-band quarrels.
My offer of getting you a signed ticket or something from Friday night was genuine, I'll see what I can do.
Is it only Ladies of The Realm that get an apology?
How's about deleting a thread without a reason or email of explanation?
Not particularly moderate of you...
For the record, every thread that is deleted brings up a text box for the moderator to explain why the thread is being deleted. The explanation is sent out by the site, in which format I don't know, as I've never received one. Whether it says it comes from me, from NOOL or what, I don't know. Spotnick would be able to advise, no doubt.
You would have received one of these messages when the thread was deleted, explaining that the thread was one of several duplicates on the same subject. I know, as I typed the message myself.
This obviously should come to you, again whether it is as an e-mail to the e-mail address with which you are registered on the site, or as a PM to your message inbox on the site, I don't know. You may wish to check your e-mail account and spam folder.
If you want to think that this is some kind of personal attack on you, that your thread has been deleted unfairly or without sticking to the protocols of the site, then so be it. It isn't, nothing untoward has taken place.
oldmonkey wrote: For the record, every thread that is deleted brings up a text box for the moderator to explain why the thread is being deleted. The explanation is sent out by the site, in which format I don't know, as I've never received one. Whether it says it comes from me, from NOOL or what, I don't know. Spotnick would be able to advise, no doubt.
You would have received one of these messages when the thread was deleted, explaining that the thread was one of several duplicates on the same subject. I know, as I typed the message myself.
This obviously should come to you, again whether it is as an e-mail to the e-mail address with which you are registered on the site, or as a PM to your message inbox on the site, I don't know. You may wish to check your e-mail account and spam folder.
If you want to think that this is some kind of personal attack on you, that your thread has been deleted unfairly or without sticking to the protocols of the site, then so be it. It isn't, nothing untoward has taken place.
Sorry. Not convinced (oops... that was an apology).
I received nada email and I don't see a second thread posted asking people to compare their feelings over '93 to '07.
I take it that every thread on fave / underrated / NO Cup / defining NO song et-bloody-cetera will be deleted forthwith sans the original.
'natch'
Craig says
wrote:
oldmonkey wrote: For the record, every thread that is deleted brings up a text box for the moderator to explain why the thread is being deleted. The explanation is sent out by the site, in which format I don't know, as I've never received one. Whether it says it comes from me, from NOOL or what, I don't know. Spotnick would be able to advise, no doubt.
You would have received one of these messages when the thread was deleted, explaining that the thread was one of several duplicates on the same subject. I know, as I typed the message myself.
This obviously should come to you, again whether it is as an e-mail to the e-mail address with which you are registered on the site, or as a PM to your message inbox on the site, I don't know. You may wish to check your e-mail account and spam folder.
If you want to think that this is some kind of personal attack on you, that your thread has been deleted unfairly or without sticking to the protocols of the site, then so be it. It isn't, nothing untoward has taken place.
Sorry. Not convinced (oops... that was an apology).
I received nada email and I don't see a second thread posted asking people to compare their feelings over '93 to '07.
I take it that every thread on fave / underrated / NO Cup / defining NO song et-bloody-cetera will be deleted forthwith sans the original.
'natch'
Can't help yourself, can you?
No I can't. I'm bloody fuming & I won't stop bloody fuming until I get a decent explanation as to why my thread was deleted... instead of say... LOCKED with an explaining note as 99% of such threads are handled.
What was so special that I deserved deletion?
Craig says
What was so special that I deserved deletion?
YOU weren't deleted. Sometimes I think that wouldn't be such a bad idea though.
A thread you posted was deleted, as has been explained to you on several occasions now at the time and since, because it was the same as three other threads we already had, two of which were also deleted.
To quote from your original thread......
NOOLigan wrote: don't we already have two threads on this?
Craig wrote:
Indeed.
Just wondered if people could feel a difference this time round..? '93 was the last big ruck.
You even acknowledged that there were already threads on this subject!
I see you've posted the same thread over on WIM. If you don't like what's happened here, may I respectfully suggest that you stay over on WIM?
But. It. Wasn't. The. Same.
It was asking people to compare their feelings between '93 and '07 as I have explained...
Seems you can't accept any difference between this and any other thread.
ONE thread talked about the WELSH thing.
ONE thread talked about the SPANISH OR WHEREVER IT WAS FROM interview.
MY thread asked if people felt any difference between '93 and '07. I feel it and I am sure other fans were. Why deny an opportunity to express views on this.
It's on WIM as I'm not being whimsically silenced without a protest.
And why you want to DELETE me I don't know... doesn't sound like the response of someone who should be a moderator.
If you can explain why you want to DELETE me within the rationale of the site's standards feel free!
patrick stewart appreciation society wrote: Are you hunting for your own apology thread?
Not fucked. Just a sentence would be nice.
Fuck's sake Craig.
You're 33, have a kid and a wife. And you're acting like a 12 year old.
Over a THREAD?????????
Craig says
Look at the time stamp on my responses. Nothing has been edited out after your replies. The only editing I have made was to correct a typo I made and to insert the quote from you from the deleted thread, where you admit that there were already threads existing on this subject.
You might like to see a shrink about this paranoia you know.
oldmonkey wrote:
Craig says
Look at the time stamp on my responses. Nothing has been edited out after your replies. The only editing I have made was to correct a typo I made and to insert the quote from you from the deleted thread, where you admit that there were already threads existing on this subject.
You might like to see a shrink about this paranoia you know.
Most shrinks are madder than the people they look after... But er... maybe I should be saying 'you just can't help yourself can you'?
Craig says
You're saying you're a donkey?
Big Black wrote:
Craig says
You're saying you're a donkey?
Maybe an ass on occassion... but this isn't one...
oldmonkey wrote:
Craig says
Look at the time stamp on my responses. Nothing has been edited out after your replies. The only editing I have made was to correct a typo I made and to insert the quote from you from the deleted thread, where you admit that there were already threads existing on this subject.
You might like to see a shrink about this paranoia you know.
You just can't help yourself can you?
Craig says
Big Black wrote:
Craig says
You're saying you're a donkey?
Maybe an ass on occassion... but this isn't one...
I beg to differ. I say you're acting a proper ass these last few days.
On BCD, read Shug's response to you. It makes sense.
Shug always makes sense.
How come anyone who challenges a moderator is always an ass?
Ah well... Guess no-one's brave enough to join me in admitting I have a point.
C'est La Vie!
Craig says
How come anyone who challenges a moderator is always an ass?
Ah well... Guess no-one's brave enough to join me in admitting I have a point.
Not true. In the past, I have had issues with Tim, but after emailing him they've been ironed out.
He doesn't hate me as much these days.
Craig says
How come anyone who challenges a moderator is always an ass?
Ah well... Guess no-one's brave enough to join me in admitting I have a point.
C'est La Vie!
Probably because you don't have a point. Everything was done procedurally correctly as per the moderator guidance, with the best interests of the whole NOOL commmunity as the only key factor. The thread was deleted because it essentially duplicated already existing threads, you were advised of this by the auto-respond feature. Whether you chose to read this advice is your lookout.
It is nothing personal Craig, despite what you may wish to believe. You aren't exactly endearing yourself to the moderators though with this stance, your card is becoming marked.
Big Black wrote:
Craig says
How come anyone who challenges a moderator is always an ass?
Ah well... Guess no-one's brave enough to join me in admitting I have a point.
Not true. In the past, I have had issues with Tim, but after emailing him they've been ironed out.
He doesn't hate me as much these days.
Had to click on your profile to remind me who you were
So Craig ISN'T get offered free signed Hooky stuff then
Is that cos he didn't have a note from his psychiatrist like Missy did?
Is there a consolation prize?
(Sorry just trying to clarify before I put in my claim for discarded plectrum.)
[black]'FREE SIGNED HOOKY STUFF FOR ALL CAMPAIGN'
[/black]
Minx wrote: So Craig ISN'T get offered free signed Hooky stuff then
Is that cos he didn't have a note from his psychiatrist like Missy did?
Is there a consolation prize?
(Sorry just trying to clarify before I put in my claim for discarded plectrum.)
[black]'FREE SIGNED HOOKY STUFF FOR ALL CAMPAIGN'
You're pretty jealous about this Hooky stuff, aren't you? Maybe you need to get Tim cheesed off at you so he can make a perceived rude remark to which you can go off and experss indignation?
Shellshocker wrote:
Minx wrote: So Craig ISN'T get offered free signed Hooky stuff then
Is that cos he didn't have a note from his psychiatrist like Missy did?
Is there a consolation prize?
(Sorry just trying to clarify before I put in my claim for discarded plectrum.)
[black]'FREE SIGNED HOOKY STUFF FOR ALL CAMPAIGN'
You're pretty jealous about this Hooky stuff, aren't you? Maybe you need to get Tim cheesed off at you so he can make a perceived rude remark to which you can go off and experss indignation?
Ooohhhh THAT'S how it's done....
Thanks for the tip
I'm going to bide my time though
and wait until Bernard memorabilia is up for grabs
Craig says
How come anyone who challenges a moderator is always an ass?
Ah well... Guess no-one's brave enough to join me in admitting I have a point.
C'est La Vie!
you have a point.
Probably because you don't have a point.
MY POINT IS THAT A THREAD ASKING PEOPLE TO COMPARE THEIR FEELINGS BETWEEN '93 AND '07 IS DIFFERENT!
the best interests of the whole NOOL commmunity as the only key factor.
The thread was deleted because it essentially duplicated already existing threads
MY POINT IS THAT A THREAD ASKING PEOPLE TO COMPARE THEIR FEELINGS BETWEEN '93 AND '07 IS DIFFERENT NOT DUPLICATION!
you were advised of this by the auto-respond feature. Whether you chose to read this advice is your lookout. IT'S NOT 'MY LOOKOUT'. NO MESSAGE WAS SENT.
It is nothing personal Craig, despite what you may wish to believe.
IF IT'S NOTHING PERSONAL WHY ARE YOU AND A SPECIFIC FEW ALWAYS ON MY CASE - AND WHY WAS THE THREAD NOT LOCKED AS IS NORMALLY THE CASE.
You aren't exactly endearing yourself to the moderators though with this stance, your card is becoming marked.
IS THIS A THREAT? AND FROM A NOOL 'MODERATOR'. HOW LOVELY.
Minx wrote:
Shellshocker wrote:
Minx wrote: So Craig ISN'T get offered free signed Hooky stuff then
Is that cos he didn't have a note from his psychiatrist like Missy did?
Is there a consolation prize?
(Sorry just trying to clarify before I put in my claim for discarded plectrum.)
[black]'FREE SIGNED HOOKY STUFF FOR ALL CAMPAIGN'
You're pretty jealous about this Hooky stuff, aren't you? Maybe you need to get Tim cheesed off at you so he can make a perceived rude remark to which you can go off and experss indignation?
Ooohhhh THAT'S how it's done....
Thanks for the tip
I'm going to bide my time though and wait until Bernard memorabilia is up for grabs
LOL You're gonna really have to piss him off to get any of that!
Forgot to say - got you an autograph and a message from Hooky, Missy, so if you send me a PM with an address I can send it to, I will put it in the post for you.
Craig says
How come anyone who challenges a moderator is always an ass?
Ah well... Guess no-one's brave enough to join me in admitting I have a point.
C'est La Vie!
If anything, you're probably taking this just a tad too seriously, Craig.
Moderators are a necessary evil.
Like roadcleaners. They're just here to clean up our shit.
It's a job no-one really wants, surely?!
Although it's obviously a very special job to them.
Can't speak for anyone else, but it is far from special. It's a stick with shit at both ends. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. There is no good aspect of the role at all.
ROCKET MICK wrote: On behalf of DIGGY MIKE may i WELCOME to the BOARD one ROBERT SMITH.
Robert Smith? Have names been changed to protect the not-so-innocent?
Shellshocker wrote:
ROCKET MICK wrote: On behalf of DIGGY MIKE may i WELCOME to the BOARD one ROBERT SMITH.
Robert Smith? Have names been changed to protect the not-so-innocent?
YES-geddit?
THE CHORLEY 2
Shellshocker wrote:
ROCKET MICK wrote: On behalf of DIGGY MIKE may i WELCOME to the BOARD one ROBERT SMITH.
Robert Smith? Have names been changed to protect the not-so-innocent?
nope, I replied to Mike's "who's going to Glastonbury" thread under the name "Robert Smith" - he didn't even notice as it wasn't in a blue and white striped bag!
El Jarvo wrote:
Craig says
How come anyone who challenges a moderator is always an ass?
Ah well... Guess no-one's brave enough to join me in admitting I have a point.
C'est La Vie!
If anything, you're probably taking this just a tad too seriously, Craig.
Moderators are a necessary evil.
Like roadcleaners. They're just here to clean up our shit.
It's a job no-one really wants, surely?!
Although it's obviously a very special job to them.
One minute we are all TRAFFIC WARDENS.......now we're ROADCLEANERS. You have a thing for men in uniform you do
ShugZV wrote:
One minute we are all TRAFFIC WARDENS.......now we're ROADCLEANERS. You have a thing for men in uniform you do
My thoughts on this are.. .
El Jarvo wrote:
ShugZV wrote:
One minute we are all TRAFFIC WARDENS.......now we're ROADCLEANERS. You have a thing for men in uniform you do
My thoughts on this are.. .
SHUGGY Bear anyone?
ROCKET MICK wrote:
El Jarvo wrote:
ShugZV wrote:
One minute we are all TRAFFIC WARDENS.......now we're ROADCLEANERS. You have a thing for men in uniform you do
My thoughts on this are.. .
SHUGGY Bear anyone?
I must admit MAJOR T that it was rather FUNNY for me!1 out of 100 is par for the course though!
ShugZV wrote: Attacked by a pair of baldies?
It's just not right I tell ye's.
right said SHED
ROCKET MICK wrote:
ShugZV wrote: Attacked by a pair of baldies?
It's just not right I tell ye's.
right said SHED
vERY DROLL rocket
