Skip to content

Split or not? Total confusion!

Archived

58 replies · 2,560 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

It had to happen. I leave the UK for seven days believing that the Order have called it a day after reading what the Hookmeister said on his (poorly punctuated and spelt) blog and then what happens? I arrive back, pull up this here site and it's saying they haven't split after all!

Now I know the Order are given to circulating false info occasionally but what's it to be, chaps? Are they to be referred to in the past tense or not?

Actually, the symbolism of today - 18.5.07 - could be interesting: continued life on an anniversary known for the end of a life. As for this BULL about "Hooky being free to leave" - the man is New Order for Gretton's sake! The idea of there being a new line-up without him is unthinkable.

RIP Ian Curtis 18.5.80

0 likes

erm...we don't know...

how's that for an answer???

0 likes

Chemical wrote: ...the man is New Order for Gretton's sake!

Quote of the week :thumb:

I certainly wouldn't travel the length of the country to see Hooky-free 'NO Lite'.

And Chem - thanks for the PM. Now I just need to work out how to get post a couple of cds to an email address :laugh:

0 likes

It would seem that we're

NOT ALLOWED TO SPECULATE OR ASK

in case we upset someone! :laugh:

0 likes

Grrr... I wanna scream! I wanna shout! I wanna know what its all about (it's happened before...but not like this).

0 likes

Well, make it what you want, but Hooky doesn't want to work with Bernard anymore.

Hence why he said New Order split, but without telling the others about it, hence why they were surprised. So now we have news from "the rest" saying New Order still exists.

So I guess they will sort it out in Cannes, and it's up to the rest of the band to decide if they want to carry on or not... as it seems evident Hooky wants out.

0 likes

Steve One wrote: It would seem that we're

NOT ALLOWED TO SPECULATE OR ASK

in case we upset someone! :laugh:

Storm in a D-cup really. :nod:

Can I name names as to who I think is basically to blame for kicking all this off!

Of course, he hasn't had chance to give his side of the argument yet! :laugh:

0 likes

Maybe from the ashes of New Order; Barney, Steve, and Phil could rise up again to form "Old Order"

(lame i know):\ohwell:

0 likes

I can't wait to see the photos of the 'band' together looking all awkward.. I mean.. they should be doing some sort of promo or interview for the Cannes premiere, no? Smile on the red carpet sort of thing? Otherwise it'd be another wasted opportunity to promote themselves for their retirement funds.

eh.. what do I know.

I just want them back together! F* the politics, just rock the house, man.

0 likes

I've said it on this board already, I'll say it again; lots of band survive and do very well and make great music after losing what is percieved to be the glue/missing link/major part of the ensemble.

The Guess Who - Randy Bachman

Depeche Mode - Alan Wilder

Skinny Puppy - Dwayne Goettel (r.i.p)

Red Hot Chili Peppers - Hillel Slovak (r.i.p) and Jack Irons

Some groups go into the toilet when they lose a major member and I am going to give New Order my confidence that if, IF without Peter Hook, they can still be great.

Hopefully they can work things out though and this is all just some old people bickering they like always do.

0 likes

Since David Sultan is in Cannes, he might come back with a few words from Hooky himself about this crisis.

0 likes

Don`t worry guys...

Maybe New Order will make a reality show to join another Bass player :bass:

:lol: :lol:

0 likes

NO Regret wrote: Maybe from the ashes of New Order; Barney, Steve, and Phil could rise up again to form "Old Order"

(lame i know):\ohwell:

or maybe 'New New Order' :)

0 likes

Hahahahahaha

0 likes

New Order to carry on without Hooky? Erm , dunno whether to laugh or cry at that .As someone once sang - Life is strange and life keeps getting stranger every day

0 likes

It's true, many bands carry on rather well without a key founding member, like Depeche Mode or Pink Floyd, but not at this point of their career... it was just a matter of one last album and it would have ended anyway, they're not really the kind of cartoon rockers like The Rolling Stones to walk on stage at 60... actually I think it's fun to see the Stones still playing at their age, but New Order wouldn't be cool at all at 60... If Bernard, Steve and Phil want to keep on working together I'm happy, they can do great music, we can have a sort of new Electronic. But they must not dare to use the New Order name, it's too holy, they'd get really burnt. If they do music with a new name critics will judge with curiosity. If they do music without Hooky as New Order they will be slaughtered. And rightly so. Anyway, who's in Cannes? I don't think Hooky's with the rest of the band, is he?!

0 likes

erm...didn't they already do an album without Hooky...Republic or something like that???

:scratch:

0 likes

with the eve of the release of control i couldnt beleive it tell you the truth, thought there was something wrong with it

RIP IC

0 likes

Uh oh. What if it turns into one of those ugly rock disputes over the band name? The next decade could be way worse than a bad album -- Peter tours with a band including Pottsy as "The Real New Order" while Bernard and Stephen make occassional festival appearances as "The JD/NO Experience" witha revolving slate of aging guest stars and Kevin Hedwik ends up with rights to the New Order name thanks to some screwup and holds a reality show to find a band, a la INXS?

:(

0 likes

maybe gillian will save the day again, can she play bass?

0 likes

Mick Aneworderfan wrote: It's true, many bands carry on rather well without a key founding member, like Depeche Mode or Pink Floyd, but not at this point of their career... it was just a matter of one last album and it would have ended anyway, they're not really the kind of cartoon rockers like The Rolling Stones to walk on stage at 60... actually I think it's fun to see the Stones still playing at their age, but New Order wouldn't be cool at all at 60... If Bernard, Steve and Phil want to keep on working together I'm happy, they can do great music, we can have a sort of new Electronic. But they must not dare to use the New Order name, it's too holy, they'd get really burnt. If they do music with a new name critics will judge with curiosity. If they do music without Hooky as New Order they will be slaughtered. And rightly so. Anyway, who's in Cannes? I don't think Hooky's with the rest of the band, is he?!

Actually, the trio [yes, Barney and Hooky and Steve] ARE in Cannes. They were there last night for the movie 'Control'.

:nod: You don't have to believe me, but it's the truth. Uh-huh.

...no, seriously, it is...

0 likes

Seen the photos its true a trio together although Hooky and Barney did have to be kept apart by some guy in a stripey shirt (no jacket)!LOL

0 likes

Same old Order then?

0 likes
0 likes

Atmospheric Jane wrote: Seen the photos its true a trio together although Hooky and Barney did have to be kept apart by some guy in a stripey shirt (no jacket)!LOL

You mean mr.morris.

:lol:

Did somebody say publicity stunt?:ignore:

0 likes

JZee wrote:

Atmospheric Jane wrote: Seen the photos its true a trio together although Hooky and Barney did have to be kept apart by some guy in a stripey shirt (no jacket)!LOL

You mean mr.morris.

:lol:

You mean MY Mr. Morris, you fudge. :deathglare:

*giggle* he's so cute! *giggle*

0 likes

Hahaha, too true, old Steve's in the middle. Peacemaker. :laugh:

0 likes

whos the bald bloke?

N who's that gimp wi the blck suit n tie sposed to be? :lol:

:nuts:

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗