Skip to content

Sumner & Morriss or Hook and Potts

Archived

12 replies · 894 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

playing live who would you rather go to see

Closed
  • Sumner & Morriss 31 (82%)
  • Hook & Potts 7 (18%)

38 votes · voting closed

i doubt Sumner and Morriss would ever play live if they continued as new order but if they did and if Hooky played new order songs with Potts I'd rather watch Hooky, much better show, and obviously, that bass!

Just thought I'd add that I would obviously prefer to see new order with Barney, Hooky, Steve, and Phil or Gill, but I doubt that will happen again, almost certainly not live anyway, but I'm still living in hope.

0 likes

I'd see both...but the bass has it,every time:bass::bow:

0 likes

Naa... I'm sticking with New Order:thumb:

0 likes

All four of them together:nod:

0 likes

Id rather watch New Order than a crap DJ who plays bass

0 likes

Sumner & Morris is 1/2 of New Order, Hook and Potts is 1/4 of New Order. I'll take the bigger proportion.

0 likes

Canuck21 wrote: Sumner & Morris is 1/2 of New Order, Hook and Potts is 1/4 of New Order. I'll take the bigger proportion.

...yeah. That. :nod:

0 likes

Why do have to choose? Are they playing the same night in different countries??

0 likes

Gillian and Phil. Great musicians and im sure most lads here would like to Phil Gill?

0 likes

NO Regret wrote: Gillian and Phil. Great musicians and im sure most lads here would like to Phil Gill?

*groan*

If I had to choose an album made by either duo while looking at them on the shelf in a record shop, I'd go for Hooky & Pottsy.

I've got all the side projects' albums and I just prefer the style and approach of Revenge, Monaco and David Potts. Nothing against Electronic, although I enjoy their music, for me it's a little to bland. The Other Two made more use of Steve's programming skills than his talent with a 'real' kit, although Gillian was wonderful on both their albums.

So for me, Hooky and Pottsy win hands down. That's not an argument starter, just my preference.

0 likes

Burt Reynolds wrote: Naa... I'm sticking with New Order:thumb:

spot on:thumb:

0 likes

Chris Nash wrote:

I've got all the side projects' albums and I just prefer the style and approach of Revenge, Monaco and David Potts. Nothing against Electronic, although I enjoy their music, for me it's a little to bland..

Too right Chris :thumb:

I found myself pretty happy and content with Monaco's stuffs during the New Order drought of late 90s to 2000. I even remember playing a joke on my friend, giving him a CD-R of Monaco's second album and told him it was New Order's comeback album.:) ...and he believed it!! :D

Everytime I bought an Electronic album I ended up a little bit disappointed...and I'm a big fan of The Smiths as well.......yes of course there were some good songs on those Electronic releases but still I thought they could have been better especially when I read about Barney & Johnny's ideas, concepts or intentions when writing or playing music....plus collectively their broad knowledge of music & its historical references, etc....Somehow all those talk doesnt seem to translate well into the final product...whereas Hooky & Pottsy seem to be able to play straight-forward simple stuff and produce great music ala NewOrder-style!

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗