new order NO-NO

aS we all know but AGAIN this was written in THE SUN which SON TWO buys TODAY BERNARD SUMNER has vetoed a NEW ORDER reunion with a pal saying"Bernard wants nothing more to do with PETER."

I can write the rest of the crap post-it IF you so deem. A spokesman said today it is UNLIKELY he will be attending the gig as he has no ticket and has he has stopped BINGE drinking the prospects of watching bands whilst SOBER makes him SHIVER. Obviously this is ROCKET MICK being spoken of here! Regards RM

oh go on then i will POST it... Peter is bassist PETER HOOK who had hoped the band could re-form for Saturday's VERSUS CANCER charity.It will still be a great line-up though featuring HAPPY mondays,inspiral carpets AND fUN loviN' criminals(IS THIS THE SAME NOW BROKEN UP corby order who are also making an appearence?).Nick King and Uncle LIam could not be contacted at this time to add to this information. God Bless NOOL

WELL IT is MY FINEST post TODAY!

Quality post, Mick!

Are you coming along to the pre-gig drink-up (orange juice/lemonade)? :)

Nick King wrote: Quality post, Mick!

Are you coming along to the pre-gig drink-up (orange juice/lemonade)? :)

rip it up AND start again!

ROCKET MICK wrote:

Nick King wrote: Quality post, Mick!

Are you coming along to the pre-gig drink-up (orange juice/lemonade)? :)

rip it up AND start again!

ROCKET MICK wrote: Nick King and Uncle LIam could not be contacted at this time to add to this information. God Bless NOOL

RM

Hooky wanted New Order to reform for Saturday?! Skeptical

tHAT IS why I POSTED IT.tHIS WAS defo written in the paper.I just thought someone had made up both a SPOKESMAN for comment re BARNEY and THIS.Difficult to prove them cos no KNOWN person is ACTUALLY quoted. Regards ROCKET MICK

Peter is bassist PETER HOOK who had hoped the band could re-form for Saturday's VERSUS CANCER charity.It will still be a great line-up though featuring HAPPY mondays,inspiral carpets AND fUN loviN' criminals.

The is THE 2nd part of the piece written in said paper.

the first part was.......

BERNARD SUMNER has vetoed a NEW ORDER reunion with a pal saying"Bernard wants nothing more to do with PETER."

The rest was written by a talented writer from THE CHORLEY SURFER.

ROCKET MICK wrote: Peter is bassist PETER HOOK who had hoped the band could re-form for Saturday's VERSUS CANCER charity.It will still be a great line-up though featuring HAPPY mondays,inspiral carpets AND fUN loviN' criminals.

The is THE 2nd part of the piece written in said paper.

the first part was.......

BERNARD SUMNER has vetoed a NEW ORDER reunion with a pal saying"Bernard wants nothing more to do with PETER."

The rest was written by a talented writer from THE CHORLEY SURFER.

... but Choley don't surf. :(

it Seems NO News is Bad news :(

El Jarvo wrote:

ROCKET MICK wrote: Peter is bassist PETER HOOK who had hoped the band could re-form for Saturday's VERSUS CANCER charity.

Is that genuine?

Hooky wanted New Order to reform for Saturday?!

Is he havin' a laff?!

it was in the current bun al...

Well no gnus is bad gnus if you were expecting some gnus, but if you were allergic to them, no gnus would be good gnus... If you were a dyslexic soldier no gnus would be bloody awful gnus....

Snorri xxx

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

7 7 7 wrote: it Seems NO News is Bad news :(

But what about GNUs??? are they good gnus, or bad gnus?

Jack,

Did you take your medicine last night?

Big Mouth Julio wrote:

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

7 7 7 wrote: it Seems NO News is Bad news :(

But what about GNUs??? are they good gnus, or bad gnus?

Jack,

Did you take your medicine last night?

Jack?

FCUK sake JULIO ...as IF HOOKy's son would post HERE!In my EXCLUSIVE thread.Mind you he did tell me...........NAH i better NOT!

Story has made it's way onto a couple of websites; namely,

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/a89618/sumner-says-no-to-new-order-reunion.html

http://www.megastar.co.uk/music/news-single-view/article/2/new-order-no-way-1.html

"Happier news in Wales though, where that little soulful warbler Duffy is celebrating her debut single reaching Number One..."

FOOK OFF!

something like that.

Snorrimon wrote: Well no gnus is bad gnus if you were expecting some gnus, but if you were allergic to them, no gnus would be good gnus... If you were a dyslexic soldier no gnus would be bloody awful gnus....

Snorri xxx