
sigh...
I don't know whether to respond in a blazing rant, or to just keep my mouth shut. Oh well what the fuck...
As someone who has been listening to both bands since the mid 80s, how the FUCK can you accuse the cure of ripping off NO purposely? Have you heard the majority of their albums?
Aside from In Between Days and maybe one or two other tracks on Head on the Door, they don't sound ANYTHING like NO! Argue and be biased all you want, but the cure have THEIR OWN SOUND! the entire boys don't cry, faith, 17seconds, and pornography sound nothing like NO's material.
When they started getting into the more synth/pop oriented sound and doing HOTD and JapWispers, yeah, they may have delved into kind of a NO-ish type sound, but hardly enough to make you say "damn! how dare they make this sound like age of consent". Please! I've never heard this accusation before anywhere even on usenet before I came here. The Cure are the cure and NO is NO. Want to claim the cure lack diversity? Listen to KissMex3 and Wish. I mean what do you expect...the cure to not play bass and fast tempos cause it might accidentally resemble some NO material? Gimmie a break!
Bottom line... all English bands from that era have some similar sounds in a few of their tracks. It's the nature of that style of music.
You wanna talk music rip-off and song cloning? Turn on the radio and check out all the Nirvana/Sound Garden rip-off bands out there *then* yell rip-off!
Leave the cure alone. They're one of the most influential bands ever to come out of the 80s. Them and NO can and will coexist peacefully.
Doubt anyone's gonna back me up in here but just note that the the above is all in *Isamu's humble opinion* Your turn :)