Skip to content

Warners respond to New Order Remaster Issues

Archived

51 replies · 7,783 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Tarbox23 wrote: warner's not going to do a damn thing, except count their money.

this is a perfect ending to an imperfect band. Hook, Sumner, Morris, and Gilbert never cared about you, and they never will.

i used to be a fan, but the past year just shows me what a joke it all is.

whatever, they played some synths in the 1980s and figured out a drum machine.

all for this, all so warner's could puke it all back up in our obedient little fan faces.

let it go.

the band signed off on this crap, and they don't care. why should we?

It all sounds a bit harsh but i'm afraid that u are right. When looking at these remasterd albums and keeping in mind what Peter Hook on forehand said about it (old tracks, special versions, live tracks blahblahblah), to me it looks also like they don't or never didn't give a fuck about the fans...:scratch:

Hard to come by but live goes on...

Glad the new Keane and Kaiser Chiefs are out:rofl: :sleep:

0 likes

Tarbox23 wrote:

the band signed off on this crap, and they don't care. why should we?

Excellent point. We all blame Warners. But really it's New Order who had signed up this irresponsible monster and who should care that THEIR product is treated dutily. Not wait for a carrier boy to bring a CD that is already in stores, but somehow take part in the process and its final result. I guess no one cares. And after all these crazy years, gigs, deaths, exciting memories, etc., the only things that will remain is their recorded music. :skeptic:

0 likes

Tarbox23 wrote:

this is a perfect ending to an imperfect band. Hook, Sumner, Morris, and Gilbert never cared about you, and they never will.

Never understood why them caring for us should be that big of a deal? They were a band that put out outstanding music, I could give a toss if they gave two shits about me, as long as they put out good albums...

...and it doesn't seem to be the band signing off on this anyways, as Hooky didn't get a chance to check it out first.

By the way was that a response from Warners? Seemed more from Hooky trying to rouse up Warners with our complaints so that they would actually take him seriously. If so, email Warners and help Hooky out and quit you pointless bitchin'....

0 likes

-1 wrote:

i'm not even going to think about the possiblity of putting better tracks on their, or being consistent, because that would be too hard for them.. (ie. include kiss of death, perfect pit, the full shellshock, shame of the nation, etc.)

later -1

Shame of the Nation is included on there...

0 likes

Mr Discography wrote:

-1 wrote:

i'm not even going to think about the possiblity of putting better tracks on their, or being consistent, because that would be too hard for them.. (ie. include kiss of death, perfect pit, the full shellshock, shame of the nation, etc.)

later -1

Shame of the Nation is included on there...

Killer track...

0 likes

Mr Discography wrote:

-1 wrote:

i'm not even going to think about the possiblity of putting better tracks on their, or being consistent, because that would be too hard for them.. (ie. include kiss of death, perfect pit, the full shellshock, shame of the nation, etc.)

later -1

Shame of the Nation is included on there...

see, they messed that up too! on the promo anyways..

later -1

0 likes

Tarbox23 wrote: warner's not going to do a damn thing, except count their money.

this is a perfect ending to an imperfect band. Hook, Sumner, Morris, and Gilbert never cared about you, and they never will.

i used to be a fan, but the past year just shows me what a joke it all is.

whatever, they played some synths in the 1980s and figured out a drum machine.

all for this, all so warner's could puke it all back up in our obedient little fan faces.

let it go.

the band signed off on this crap, and they don't care. why should we?

WTF:scratch:

You call yourself a 'fan' but are so quick to dismiss them as 'they played some synths.....etc.',& that's it?! Fook me,if I was as fickle as that to totally dismiss a band whom I love dearly & have done for over 25 years,just because of some fuck-up by Warners,I wouldn't call myself a fan.Sure,I'm very disappointed,but fook me :nonono:

0 likes

May I just point out that as Warners hold the Publishing rights, they don't need New Order to 'sign off' anything and probably didn't even bother to try.

They will just go ahead and do it. Maybe the band members were told, 'These are the tracks'. The band wouldn't have known that track listings were wrong or that there were technical faults...

The others seem to have kept pretty quiet in public, but at least Hooky has bothered to mention it/attempted to do something about it.

A complaints address is a start - we didn't have that before, did we?

As for saying that Hooky can 'piss off' try saying that to his face (or mine for that matter) after he's been the only one to actually listen to any of the sad, obsessive fans over the years and attempt to do ANYTHING about it - from getting certain tracks put back into the live set to attempting to sort out behind the scenes problems...

0 likes

Chris Nash wrote: May I just point out that as Warners hold the Publishing rights, they don't need New Order to 'sign off' anything and probably didn't even bother to try.

They will just go ahead and do it. Maybe the band members were told, 'These are the tracks'. The band wouldn't have known that track listings were wrong or that there were technical faults...

The others seem to have kept pretty quiet in public, but at least Hooky has bothered to mention it/attempted to do something about it.

A complaints address is a start - we didn't have that before, did we?

As for saying that Hooky can 'piss off' try saying that to his face (or mine for that matter) after he's been the only one to actually listen to any of the sad, obsessive fans over the years and attempt to do ANYTHING about it - from getting certain tracks put back into the live set to attempting to sort out behind the scenes problems...

If Warners hold the rights and didn't have to consult any of the members (probably) then why is that Hooky chatted so much about the re-masters and the stuff he wanted to put on those extra discs and worked on? i mean he talked about live-tracks, demo's and other stuff he'd found in basements, cupboards and is his shed. When looking at the result it really makes wonder if he was involved in the end? he cannot be pleased with the result, can he:confused2: v:crazy:

Or will there be other stuff coming out soon, compiled and worekd on by Hooky? now i would love that....

0 likes

If only there were tie-in New Order 'Care Bears'.

That'd make everything alright in my eyes.

And I never joke about Care Bears.

Ever.

0 likes

I'm listening to 'The Sound of The Smiths' here at work where we are producing it, release on 10th November kids :thumb:, and one must admit to being very impressed by the production.......Johnny Marr oversaw that you know.....Who owns the publishing rights to the Smiths????????

0 likes

Alf wrote: I'm listening to 'The Sound of The Smiths' here at work where we are producing it, release on 10th November kids :thumb:, and one must admit to being very impressed by the production.......Johnny Marr oversaw that you know.....Who owns the publishing rights to the Smiths????????

If I'm honest I have to say that 'The Sound Of The Smiths' is a bit of a pointless compilation. A couple of rarities thrown into yet another best of. Barely worth doing.

As for publishers, this is a different thing entirely to record labels. Publishers don't put records/CDs out.

0 likes

Alf wrote: I'm listening to 'The Sound of The Smiths' here at work where we are producing it, release on 10th November kids :thumb:, and one must admit to being very impressed by the production.......Johnny Marr oversaw that you know.....Who owns the publishing rights to the Smiths????????

I read about this ages ago - Johnny and Mozz burying the hatchet and getting together to give the old tracks the release they deserve. I'm really looking forward to hearing them.

0 likes

johnny james wrote:

Alf wrote: I'm listening to 'The Sound of The Smiths' here at work where we are producing it, release on 10th November kids :thumb:, and one must admit to being very impressed by the production.......Johnny Marr oversaw that you know.....Who owns the publishing rights to the Smiths????????

If I'm honest I have to say that 'The Sound Of The Smiths' is a bit of a pointless compilation. A couple of rarities thrown into yet another best of. Barely worth doing.

As for publishers, this is a different thing entirely to record labels. Publishers don't put records/CDs out.

My point is that Warners are putting out Smiths 'remastered' and they have put out New Orders 'remastered'...difference being that Johnny Marr oversaw the remastering and there aren't any nasty crappy clicks on it....nobody from New Order were involved in theirs.......What are the reasons for this? Were NO happy for these to be released in this condition?

0 likes

Members of the band did oversee the remastering of the principle albums, and in the main these are fine.

Unfortunately they left the extra disc bit to Warners (though they did select the tracks).

0 likes

I must admit it seems strange Hooky was speaking in the months running up to the reissues how excited he was trawling through the rare stuff and now his BBC6 interview gives the impression there was very little involvement after all. Something doesn't tally here whether it's with the band or label.

I'm also finding this repetitive "lost master tapes" story tough to believe in parts; London have successfully re-released most of the bonus disc tracks - which suffer badly from gloops and skips on the bonus discs - many times previously I.e.

Touched by the Hand of God 12" (International 2002): Clear, crisp and probably the best mastering available.

Touched by the Hand of God 12" (Brotherhood Bonus 2008): Compressed, skips, gloops etc: an aural pile of shite.

What happened in the intervening six years? That's what I'd like to know. How often can they blame it on "they got lost in the Factory collapse"? Indefinitely it would seem. Warners have been peddling and re-peddling a fair few "non-album" tracks since 1994 which is why there's more than a whiff of shite about the missing master tapes story.

Even three years ago "Singles" may have had dubious mastering but at least those tracks sounded as if they came from master tapes and not a record deck put through Cool Edit. A good chunk of that compilation was unreleased 7" vinyl tracks not seen since the original Factory releases too!

Weird.

0 likes

David Sultan probably has all the original master tapes, that he purchased from Hook in the 90s, locked away in his Florida basement!

We should blame him, not Warners!

:wink:

0 likes

does anybody have Sultan's address? just curious:rolleyes:

0 likes

Since I already own everything from these reissues -- except by the Tall Paul remix of TF I suppose -- I maybe would get them for the packaging/graphic aspect, but hey... we all need to chill out for a while.

Warners are not getting my money this time, they'll have to find another way to earn cash to pay for the beautiful stuff they use to buy for their mistresses apartments. No problem at all, I'll use the money for really productive purposes like getting DVD-Rs to backup my porn stuff and wait for the next release -- Live in Glasgow was great, by the way. :thumb:

0 likes

scrimshanker wrote: does anybody have Sultan's address? just curious:rolleyes:

FAC 441, Palatine Rd, Miami, Fl.

0 likes

scrimshanker wrote: does anybody have Sultan's address? just curious:rolleyes:

am sure you could email him on worldinmotion:sleep:

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗