Skip to content

Pitchfork review Never Cry Another Tear

Archived

17 replies · 1,185 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Album Review Bad Lieutenant Never Cry Another Tear [Triple Echo; 2009] 4.1


New Order may be gone, but it'll take a while before any of their members' follow-up bands feel like more than side projects. A group like Bad Lieutenant-- including Bernard Sumner and latter-day Order member Phil Cunningham, with Stephen Morris also on hand-- is always going to be compared, rather than considered.

In that sense-- and that sense only-- it's a good thing Never Cry Another Tear is such an unassuming album: It's so breezily unambitious as to make the comparison feel unfair, even when you can't avoid it. It's all too common for famous musicians to talk about how they made a record mostly for their own amusement, but this album really does feel like that: relaxed, not overthought, indeed hardly thought at all. Sumner, guitarist Cunningham, and third key member Jake Evans are happy to share your attention, even if it means everything on the record is a minute too long to keep it. "Running Out of Luck" starts purposefully and wanders happily away into indifferent jangle-rock; "Head Into Tomorrow" switches wistful guitar figures for draggy vocals from Evans. It's as if the musicians are passing the spotlight between them like a game controller-- Not sure how to do this bit. Fancy a go, mate?

With the electronics mostly set aside for an album Sumner is making with Jacques Lu Cont, what Bad Lieutenant have to offer is guitar rock. A specifically British strain of guitar rock, in fact, with the rhythm section sidelined and the guitars themselves often blending into a mid-range soup with keyboards and backing vocals. It's been one of the staple sounds of UK music-- and specifically Manchester music-- since Britpop-- and songs like "Runaway" and "Shine Like the Sun" are steeped in it. You can hear echoes here of James, latter-day Oasis, and John Squire's Seahorses.

Grim names to invoke, and thankfully Bad Lieutenant aren't fully in that leaden company-- Sumner's offhand anti-charisma means the record never strains for effect when he's singing, and there's at least one pretty idea in every song, even if it usually gets drowned. The moody, Doves-ish "Twist of Fate" and the thoughtful "Dynamo", with its "Won't Get Fooled Again" keyboard, are the best and most coherent things here. "Summer Days on Holiday" is more typical, though. It has Sumner's best performance on the album, filled with enigmatic threat. But that gets lost as the verses slide into one of those functionally soaring Britrock choruses, and both sit badly with the record's most pointlessly pyrotechnic guitar work. Underpinning it all is perhaps the thinnest drum sound Stephen Morris has ever been near. Like most Bad Lieutenant tracks, it never quite coheres.

Of all the former New Order members, Sumner has (thanks to Electronic) the best track record outside the band, but Bad Lieutenant are strolling along a familiar road here: like previous breakaways Monaco or the Other Two, this record meanders through a set of passable songs that ultimately decline to move or enthrall you. It's another chance, I guess, to reflect on the curious workings of gestalt and the casual, inscrutable heartbreak these people could create together. Sumner and Morris helped make some of the greatest popular music of the late 20th century: They have nothing left to prove, but does that have to be so obvious?

— Tom Ewing, October 9, 2009

http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/13563-never-cry-another-tear/

0 likes

Even I would have been more diplomatic in a review than that. :shrug:

Thanks for posting it :thumb:

0 likes

So.....with American reviews like this, does that put an end to Barney's comments on a "full american tour in the spring"?

0 likes

Probably the most accurate review I've seen so far.

0 likes

0_o wrote: With the electronics mostly set aside for an album Sumner is making with Jacques Lu Cont

Really? Anyone have more on this revelation?

0 likes

Dennis Remmer wrote:

0_o wrote: With the electronics mostly set aside for an album Sumner is making with Jacques Lu Cont

Really? Anyone have more on this revelation?

I don't know the specifics, but Barney has specifically said something about making something synth based with Jacques Lu Cont (Stuart Price).

0 likes

Interesting that "Summer days..." was panned by this reviewer...I think it was the strongest song on the album. Also...He kind of praised Dynamo..which I think was a weaker track.

To each his own,,,I guess.

N.

0 likes

Ech...I absolutely cannot fucking stand Pitchfork.

It's not this review that gets on my nerves, it's the general over-intellectualization, their stupid decimal system scores, their insincere praise of mediocre hip-hop to appear 'street'...their reviews are so bizarrely off the mark I find it hard to believe I listened to the same thing.

AARGG - had to get that off my chest.

FWIW, I've heard the Bad Lieutenant album twice and it's good.

0 likes

FtotheDoubleOff wrote: Ech...I absolutely cannot fucking stand Pitchfork.

It's not this review that gets on my nerves, it's the general over-intellectualization, their stupid decimal system scores, their insincere praise of mediocre hip-hop to appear 'street'...their reviews are so bizarrely off the mark I find it hard to believe I listened to the same thing.

AARGG - had to get that off my chest.

FWIW, I've heard the Bad Lieutenant album twice and it's good.

So the score of 4.1- is it out of 10, then? If it's out of 5 it seems a high score for such a negative review.

I think it's good too. Good enough, not great. Good enough sucks if you're hoping for instant classic, life-changing music though. If I quit analyzing it and just plug the player in, it's a pretty enjoyable listen. It should really come together in the live setting. I'd give it a decimal review of 3.645 out of 5, or 7.18 out of 10.:wink:

0 likes

nataliet wrote:

FtotheDoubleOff wrote: Ech...I absolutely cannot fucking stand Pitchfork.

It's not this review that gets on my nerves, it's the general over-intellectualization, their stupid decimal system scores, their insincere praise of mediocre hip-hop to appear 'street'...their reviews are so bizarrely off the mark I find it hard to believe I listened to the same thing.

AARGG - had to get that off my chest.

FWIW, I've heard the Bad Lieutenant album twice and it's good.

So the score of 4.1- is it out of 10, then? If it's out of 5 it seems a high score for such a negative review.

I think it's good too. Good enough, not great. Good enough sucks if you're hoping for instant classic, life-changing music though. If I quit analyzing it and just plug the player in, it's a pretty enjoyable listen. It should really come together in the live setting. I'd give it a decimal review of 3.645 out of 5, or 7.18 out of 10.:wink:

I think pitchfork scores out a total of 8.562, 8.597 on days divisible by Pi

0 likes

I think it's good too. Good enough, not great. Good enough sucks if you're hoping for instant classic, life-changing music though.

My thoughts exactly. Though I've only listened to it twice. 'Summer Days on Holiday' made the biggest impression on me. Great track.

0 likes

FtotheDoubleOff wrote: Ech...I absolutely cannot fucking stand Pitchfork.

It's not this review that gets on my nerves, it's the general over-intellectualization, their stupid decimal system scores, their insincere praise of mediocre hip-hop to appear 'street'...their reviews are so bizarrely off the mark I find it hard to believe I listened to the same thing.

AARGG - had to get that off my chest.

FWIW, I've heard the Bad Lieutenant album twice and it's good.

I agree. Pitchfork make me want to puke. 9 times out of ten, if they say an albums good, I usually think its pretentious melody free crap.

I listened to BL to see what BL sound like, not expecting them to be New Order.

0 likes

FtotheDoubleOff wrote: ...their insincere praise of mediocre hip-hop to appear 'street'...

Amen, brother! Hammer, meet nail.

0 likes

El Jarvo wrote: Probably the most accurate review I've seen so far.

:nod:

:smoking:

0 likes

El Jarvo wrote: Probably the most accurate review I've seen so far.

+1

I certainly wouldn't give it a 4... more like a 7... but just about every point made in this review mirrors my reaction.

Disagree with the "perhaps the thinnest drum sound Stephen Morris has ever been near." One thing I hate about WFTSC is the "let's just plug the Roland V-drums right into the mixing board... that's close enough" sound. I much prefer this record in that regard.

Fully agree with the "record's most pointlessly pyrotechnic guitar work" -- that solo takes me right out of Bad Lieutenant land and has me :scratch: wondering, "Where have I heard that solo?"

0 likes

Gnu Odor wrote:

Disagree with the "perhaps the thinnest drum sound Stephen Morris has ever been near."

I would agree that one of the first impressions I had of the album was that the drums and rhythm section were so bland/run of the mill by JD/NO standards.

I think that Stephen Morris should be a little pissed that he is given second billing in the band by the media, since he had no involvement with most of the songs. The writers tend to ignore Jake Evans, and apparently Matt Evans his brother had more involvement than Stephen.

0 likes

0_o wrote:

Gnu Odor wrote:

Disagree with the "perhaps the thinnest drum sound Stephen Morris has ever been near."

I would agree that one of the first impressions I had of the album was that the drums and rhythm section were so bland/run of the mill by JD/NO standards.

I think that Stephen Morris should be a little pissed that he is given second billing in the band by the media, since he had no involvement with most of the songs. The writers tend to ignore Jake Evans, and apparently Matt Evans his brother had more involvement than Stephen.

You are so right- correct me if I'm wrong (and I'm sure somebody will), but Steve's drums aren't supposed to be on the album- didn't family obligations prevent him from recording? We shall see how it sounds live.

0 likes

nataliet wrote: You are so right- correct me if I'm wrong (and I'm sure somebody will), but Steve's drums aren't supposed to be on the album- didn't family obligations prevent him from recording? We shall see how it sounds live.

Indeed, but some of it was recorded in his studio, wasn't it? :scratch:

:smoking:

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗