Skip to content

Peter Hook Doesn't See Rivalry With Bernard Sumner

Archived

17 replies · 1,321 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

After all the ups and downs former Joy Division/New Order bass player Peter Hook, aka Hooky, has endured you'd expect the final split of his legendary band to be a bitter one. Yet when Spinner literally interrupted him at work on the debut album from his new project Freebass to talk about his first book 'The Hacienda: How Not to Run a Club,' he was somewhat uncharacteristically complimentary.

This after all is the man who recently branded Morrissey a "twat who makes Mark E Smith look popular!" But when asked about Bernard Sumner's Bad Lieutenant Hooky was quick to dismiss any potential rivalry. "Do I feel that he's a rival? No I don't actually, because when I listen to their music, to me it sounds like (Sumner's former project with Johnny Marr) Electronic which is basically New Order without the bass," he explains. "When I listen to Freebass it sounds totally different so there's no need for any rivalry."

So how does he feel about working without his band mates of the last 30-odd years? "Well I think Bernard and I are addicted to starting again," he states, "every time we seem to get somewhere we decide to split for a fresh start."

It's this desire for freshness that Hooky feels motivates the estranged pair; "I was looking at New Order's MySpace page the other day and it's like it's covered in cobwebs, but you look at Bernard's site and it's all new fangle-dangle, and then you look at mine and it's all Yeah! Yeah! Yeah! It's like we're addicted to starting again even though the thing that makes us survive, New Order, is pushed to the side."

With so much seemingly in common does this desire for fresh starts and occasional reconciliations point to an addiction between the two of them? "Well I don't know really," muses Hooky, "there is certainly an unhealthy element of co-dependency as I've found out. The interesting thing about the break-up is that it wasn't that either of us was arguing about breaking up, it was about what his band was called. And that's probably the root of our troubles, we never attack the actual problem we always just do the surface bit."

Outside influences clearly didn't help the band during this time either. Now sadly without their late, legendary manager Rob Gretton and Factory label boss Tony Wilson facilitating their squabbles, Hooky feels that the band's new management were a bit too hands off.

"You rely on your management getting you through these things and making sure it doesn't get personal," he says, "but our new team didn't know how to handle us. So they just let us run off and f*** everything up, and that's maybe something Bernard and I will have to live with for the rest of our lives." So does he feel any lasting bitterness towards Sumner? It would seem not, "I wish him all the best," he says, "and I hope he has a great time and enjoys himself, I really do."

http://www.spinner.com/2009/10/20/peter-hook-doesnt-see-rivalry-with-bernard-sumner/

0 likes

Is it just me or does everyone else feel incredibly frustrated by this interview??!!

It does make you wonder what the feckin whole point of this whole, messy, heartbreaking 3 years has been?

0 likes

For my knowledge Hooky got upset cause Bernard wanted to continue with the name "New Order" without him...:shrug:

0 likes

It is frustrating to listen to. These guys stood by each other for almost 30 years. They were like brothers. They survived the disintegration of Joy Division and came out of it. :cry:

I think part of the problem is typical male pride. Neither wants to make the first move or else look like the "weak" one.:banghead:

0 likes

What a sad creature he's become! I guess he acquired this opinion on Morrissey due to his (now) bandmate Andy Rourke, who is a proper git anyways. I don't have a problem with people criticising Morrissey, but to talk rubbish just for the sake of it is really pathetic. I used to respect Peter Hook but I don't anymore. However, I will always respect Bernard Sumner and Steve Morris.

0 likes

I think that's fair enough on Hooky's behalf as he doesn't have to be that magnanimous towards Barney. It's moved things on a bit from trading legal threats in the musak press a few years ago. The "starting again" theory sounds pretty plausible and is complimentary to both of them.

Purely speculative but I think Hooky's problem with Morrissey stems from the quiffed one having slagged off Joy Division in print and more than once. Hooky's understandably very protective of his band and the memory of Ian so you can see to an extent why he has his opinions on Moz.

I'm a fan of The Smiths and Morrissey's solo stuff but it's bewildering watching all his disciples (particularly on Morrissey Solo) get worked up when Hooky slags him off in print every few years. "Hooky Calls Morrissey A Twat" is about as newsworthy as "It Gets Dark At Night".

We've known he doesn't like him for years...

0 likes

Anchor Girl wrote: What a sad creature he's become! I guess he acquired this opinion on Morrissey due to his (now) bandmate Andy Rourke, who is a proper git anyways. I don't have a problem with people criticising Morrissey, but to talk rubbish just for the sake of it is really pathetic. I used to respect Peter Hook but I don't anymore. However, I will always respect Bernard Sumner and Steve Morris.

Bit harsh........

0 likes

Ally wrote: Purely speculative but I think Hooky's problem with Morrissey stems from the quiffed one having slagged off Joy Division in print and more than once. Hooky's understandably very protective of his band and the memory of Ian so you can see to an extent why he has his opinions on Moz.

Well, quite... Any Smiths/Morrissey fan ought to know that, surely? :shrug:

:smoking:

0 likes

I wish Hooky would do a bit less talking now and just get on with his Freebass project :shrug:

0 likes

Seeing as Hooky hasn't released anything yet there is no rivalry.

:laugh:

And not letting Barney, Steve and Phil carry on with the NO name was a bit churlish, shildly???

0 likes

Im by no means an expert but from what Ive read/seen from Barney and Hooky of late, they both seem very warm, friendly, witty, articulate, nice fellas. Its a crying shame they couldnt patch up whatever differences/disagreements they had and continued as NO. From a NO fan it is hugely frustrating and sad.

However, they both seemed to have moved on and I can only appreciate what they are doing, in their own right, even more.

I really love the BL album and Barney seems to be really happy with his lot. So good on him.

Hooky, I wish him all the best, with the book and getting Freebase to release something.

Im glad all the playground name calling has ended.

0 likes

NO Regret wrote: Im by no means an expert but from what Ive read/seen from Barney and Hooky of late, they both seem very warm, friendly, witty, articulate, nice fellas. Its a crying shame they couldnt patch up whatever differences/disagreements they had and continued as NO. From a NO fan it is hugely frustrating and sad.

However, they both seemed to have moved on and I can only appreciate what they are doing, in their own right, even more.

I really love the BL album and Barney seems to be really happy with his lot. So good on him.

Hooky, I wish him all the best, with the book and getting Freebass to release something.

Im glad all the playground name calling has ended.

A fine post. One minor amendment. ;)

0 likes

I can quite understand why Hooky would object to Barney, Steve and Phil carrying on New Order without him! Some consider that Gillian leaving was the end of an era and it was but for a band to call themselves New Order without Peter Hook is not on: the man's an integral part of the band!

0 likes

Chemical wrote: I can quite understand why Hooky would object to Barney, Steve and Phil carrying on New Order without him! Some consider that Gillian leaving was the end of an era and it was but for a band to call themselves New Order without Peter Hook is not on: the man's an integral part of the band!

They could call thelselves "Disorder"

0 likes

Anchor Girl wrote: What a sad creature he's become! I guess he acquired this opinion on Morrissey due to his (now) bandmate Andy Rourke, who is a proper git anyways. I don't have a problem with people criticising Morrissey, but to talk rubbish just for the sake of it is really pathetic. I used to respect Peter Hook but I don't anymore. However, I will always respect Bernard Sumner and Steve Morris.

Why blame Andy Rourke? Morrissey IS a fucking twat, that's been plainly evident to everyone for years.

I'm sure Hooky will be crushed to have lost your respect.

0 likes

UpDownTurnAround wrote: And not letting Barney, Steve and Phil carry on with the NO name was a bit churlish, shildly???

Sort of like Ian not letting them carry on with the JD name, eh? Wotta bastard.

0 likes

Hooky probably got along with Andy Rourke because he went through his own band implosion with the Smiths and he probably gave him some advice on how to deal with it. What's interesting is seeing how the Smiths and New Order used to be rivals and now the individual members are becoming comrades. First Barney worked with Johnny Marr and now Hooky's working with Andy Rourke. What's next....a Morrisey & the Other Two collaboration???? That would be too funny!:abovelol:

0 likes

i want to hear hooky play all the jd bass stuff.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗