Wow, didn't expect that much reaction!
Some great points have been made since my original post, but I think Huntsman is on the right track.
NO songs are more than just 3 lads and a lass singing tunes...
I think everyone could agree that a NO song is a masterpiece because of the image, lyrics and music. However, I would argue that taken individually these facets are still very powerful and just as meaningful.
Think about it...
- just looking at their covers, you see a band that is more than what appears... many of you have the posters, not just because it is of a song or a band, but because the image itself is beautiful and powerful.
- the lyrics even done karaioke (eek!) still evoke a powerful feeling or image... I agree with Neil Tennant of PSB that Bernard is an underrated lyricist... writing songs that you never really know what they are about. (paraphrased from Story) and they allow your mind to create a vision.
- and well the music... that’s a given! I bet a NO song would sound good from a middle school recorder group.
Bottomline, all the components of NO song (image, lyrics, music etc) are remarkable by themselves (and yes better together) and if others can provide a talent (images, remixed music, vocals, etc) in the spirit of the piece then it should be welcomed and appreciated.
And with this point... I approve of a young nymphet singing Temptation!
Thanks again for the dialogue...
-Bob