Skip to content

Peter Hook Preps 'Unknown Pleasures' Gigs, Says New Order Reunion Possible

Archived

70 replies · 5,747 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Next month, as radio stations switch over to Christmas music, bassist Peter Hook will spread his own version of holiday cheer. Instead of 'Joy to the World,' he'll offer up some Joy Division, performing that band's classic 1979 debut album, 'Unknown Pleasures,' in cities across America.

As if this weren't gift enough, Hook is giving hope to fans that would like to see New Order -- the group that rose from the ashes of Joy Division following the 1980 suicide of singer Ian Curtis -- reform and revisit some of its seminal material.

"I'm a chancer, and I'd like to do New Order stuff, because I love it," Hook tells Spinner. "'Power Corruption and Lies,' 'Low-Life,' 'Movement' -- I think they're great records. Really, I think they deserve airing again. Why not?"

Well, for starters, there was New Order's messy 2007 break-up, not to mention the public war of words Hook and singer-guitarist Bernard Sumner have waged ever since. The former band mates haven't been shy about slagging each other in the press, and since the latter has been busy with Bad Lieutenant -- a group that also features New Order guitarist Phil Cunningham -- a reconciliation seems unlikely, to say the least.

"It's funny, in a way -- as a businessman, you'd have to say if the offer to reform New Order came along, you'd consider it," Hook says. "Emotionally, it's a completely different aspect. But I don't' know, these things happen all the time. I used to joke with Bernard before we split up about us having to split up soon so we could reform. Everyone else had reformed, and we'd never split up. In a funny way, maybe I should have kept my mouth shut."

"I know we've been offered a lot of money to reform, but it has not happened," Hook adds. "That's the great thing about life--you don't know what's coming around the corner. Everything surprises you. I never thought I'd get the response I have and get a whole new lease on life with ['Unknown Pleasures'], a record I wrote 30 years ago."

http://www.spinner.com/2010/11/21/peter-hook-hasnt-ruled-out-new-order-reunion/

0 likes

linus sulanki wrote: I never thought I'd get the response I have and get a whole new lease on life with ['Unknown Pleasures'], a record I wrote 30 years ago."

"a record I wrote"?

0 likes

Dont start.

0 likes

dlgladwin wrote:

linus sulanki wrote: I never thought I'd get the response I have and get a whole new lease on life with ['Unknown Pleasures'], a record I wrote 30 years ago."

"a record I wrote"?

Well, I'm guessing only Hooky was in the interview so he said 'I', but of course we all know that all of the band members of JD wrote the album.

0 likes

leather_girl wrote:

Well, I'm guessing only Hooky was in the interview so he said 'I', but of course we all know that all of the band members of JD wrote the album.

He still should have said we.

0 likes

dlgladwin wrote:

leather_girl wrote:

Well, I'm guessing only Hooky was in the interview so he said 'I', but of course we all know that all of the band members of JD wrote the album.

He still should have said we.

Ah, I see. :read:

0 likes

dlgladwin wrote:

leather_girl wrote:

Well, I'm guessing only Hooky was in the interview so he said 'I', but of course we all know that all of the band members of JD wrote the album.

He still should have said we.

Why? To appease the sort of pedant that would pick up on suchlike?. This is not an issue. Please dont make it one.:banghead:

0 likes

Peter Hook Brings Joy Division's "Unknown Pleasures" to Royale

The music of Joy Division – at least its first album “Unknown Pleasures,” early singles and songs they did as Warsaw before they became JD – will finally be played in the United States. And at Royale Sat. Dec. 4. Not played by Joy Divison, exactly. By Joy Division bassist-turned-singer Peter Hook and four mates, including his song Jack Bates on bass. The outfit is called Peter Hook's The Light. Joy Division went down May 23, 1980, when singer-lyricist Ian Curtis hanged himself, just as the Manchester, England-based band was about to embark upon a US tour. The surviving band members, bassist Peter Hook, guitarist Bernard Sumner and drummer Stephen Morris, quickly regrouped as New Order, and toured America five months later. Their emphasis shifted to moody electronic dance/alt-rock. And they became rather huge through the ‘80s and ‘90s. They disbanded several times, in 1992 initially (instigated by Sumner) and finally in 2006 (instigated by Hook.) Hook had several musical projects, including the band Freebass, going, but earlier this year the Macclesfield (part of Manchester) city council asked Hook to put together a tribute show and exhibition to commemorate Curtis. Hook approached Sumner and Morris who initially agreed, but the plans fell apart. Hook had put the time in and decided to continue, assembled a band and played “Unknown Pleasures.” Then he got more calls from promoters in other cities. Could he bring this to them? He did and that began the project that tours the US shortly. It also brought down a shitstorm on Hook’s head, with various Joy Division fans feeling it was inappropriate or just plain wrong. (One blogger thought it like Krist Novoselic touring Nirvana’s “Nevermind.”) Joy Division to them was a museum piece, not to be tinkered with. Hook, on the other hand, felt why not? It’s a live celebration of the work Curtis and company did, a celebration 30 years after his death. Way too late, of course, but what are you going to do? And, keep in mind, Curtis wrote the words but songs were a four-way collaboration. The music belongs to them all. And us, if we want it. We spoke with Hook for a story that will be running soon in the Boston Herald. What we offer here are some bits that didn’t make the Herald cut.

JSInk: How did this come about? Hook: I thought this was a great idea because we never did anything celebrating Joy Division or Ian. I thought ‘Fucking great, well overdue.’ I’ll help. I through my oar in, and the idea was to do an exhibition of memorabilia that [artist, cover designer] Peter Saville was going to preside over and curate and a memorial gig with all Manchester musicians playing Joy Division songs. I thought it sounds good. It wouldn’t be so difficult to see me, Bernard and Stephen reunite for a charity gig to celebrate Ian’s life. It all fell by the wayside. I won’t go into the whys and wherefors, but it didn’t happen. Basically, I was so wound up by this I thought, “Shit, fuck it, why don’t I do something?”

**JSInk: What roles did you play in Joy Division?**Hook: We played, Ian spotted it – “That sounds good, do that together.” Steve put them jungle drums on it and we were off and Ian did the vocals. We’d help him with the vocals. He did the words himself. It was a very even split the labor, which in a group is a wonderful thing. It got a bit disjointed in New Order, because in all fairness [keyboardist] Gillian [Gilbert] never took up the mantle Ian had left. It very much left the three of us writing in New Order. It was like a flat tire … the dynamic changed.

Your bass was always prominent in Joy Division’s music. You played lead bass. How did that happen? Heh heh. It came about quite simply, to be honest. When I played low I couldn’t hear because Bernard was loud. So I started playing high and that used to cut through and Ian heard it and said “My god, it sounds really good when you play high and Bernard plays the chunky chords. Let’s work on that.’ “She’s Lost Control” was the first one. It came rapid fire after that. It was as simple as that. It became a style you fell into very easily and very happily. I would go through periods of paranoia when everyone was doing slap bass, I was paranoid because I didn’t do slap. I was doing it my way and someone said to me, “Whenever you start playing I immediately know it’s you” and I thought “Oh shit, that’s bad.” I decided that was bad. I got Donald Johnson from A Certain Ratio to teach me slap bass and I had about two lessons and he said to me, “Hooky, you’re fucking hopeless, stick to what you do best.” He threw me out basically. I have my theory, when New Order split up and I formed Revenge I went out of my way to downplay the melodic side of the bass and it was only I got back to Monaco and [singer David Potts] Pottsy encouraged me to get back to how I was. I got it back again and now I’m immensely proud of it, because as my mother said, “You need a gimmick.” There was an article today about the Kings of Leon bass player put down his inspiration was me. My son was very impressed by that.

How do you see this tour? It’s a great compliment to Joy Division, to all of us really, [producer] Martin Hannnet, [Factory Records owner] Tony Wilson, [manager] Rob Greton, the four members of the band. It’s a great compliment to your skills as a songwriter, as a group, as a performer, as a record company for believing in that record and as a manager for believing in that group. To be able to sit here, 30 years on and play it. The weird thing about playing it is I thought honestly I thought I would play it once and that would be it. I was happy with that. We ended up doing two nights in Manchester and had no other dates planned. And then I got asked to do Manchester’s twin city in France at a festival celebrating Manchester music. So I did it again. Then I got asked to play in Portugal, Spain, Germany, Holland and every single time I played down it’s gone down a storm. After 30 years it’s fucking great to get the music back, because we studiously ignored it as New Order. In a funny way, it was quite important then because of how big we felt Joy Division. It was important to plough your own way, do something on your own, which we did very successfully in New Order. A Great mix of skill and talent. The thing is now it’s quite an odd situation to be in. I finished the Freebass record this year, which was gonna be the new record we were going to promote and then I ended up doing “Unknown Pleasures” and Mani [Gary Mounfield, bassist in Freebass and Primal Scream] ended up dong “Screamadelica.” I haven’t played in America for a long time, since the Moby tour in 2004. Six years. I’m really looking forward to getting over and being able to play again.

There’s all sorts of thoughts about Ian. He was battling epilepsy. There was the sense of doom and gloom that was there in the music and of course the way he took his life. Was he dour, depressed? He was a very hail fellow, well meant. He would never tell you he was depressed. I would take him to hospital when he had these epileptic fits and I’d sit there holding his tongue for an hour and a half till he stopped fitting. He’d come round and say, “Right where s the party?” I’d say “Get in fucking bed will you.” He really was his own worst enemy and he was our greatest fan and critic. If any of us started to falter, it was always him that grabbed you by the collar and dragged you through. He really was the best at helping you get through. I think he knew he maybe might have been struggling, but I’ll tell you what he was definitely not going to let us down. We’d say over and over to him, “Rob said, ‘Well. stop take a year off, do what you want, get yourself better’” and he’d go “No, no, I don’t want to let the lads down.’” He was his own worst enemy in that respect, band because we were so young and inexperienced, we just couldn’t handle it. http://www.jimsullivanink.com/content/view/1901/38/

0 likes

There's not gonna be a New Order reunion if he keeps slagging off bandmates - Gillian was "a flat tire"?

0 likes

Shakin' Baker wrote: There's not gonna be a New Order reunion if he keeps slagging off bandmates - Gillian was "a flat tire"?

At the very least we can all agree that there won't be a New Order reunion unless everyone else that was in NO agrees to do it. (That is---it won't be a real reunion with just Hooky; no offence to him though.)

0 likes

Shakin' Baker wrote: There's not gonna be a New Order reunion if he keeps slagging off bandmates - Gillian was "a flat tire"?

that's a bit of a misquote.

0 likes

Shakin' Baker wrote: There's not gonna be a New Order reunion if he keeps slagging off bandmates - Gillian was "a flat tire"?

Think he is calling "Ian" the flat tire out of the four tires on the auto, and Gillian was just a spare but not the same as the original tire.

0 likes

Shakin' Baker wrote: There's not gonna be a New Order reunion if he keeps slagging off bandmates - Gillian was "a flat tire"?

Read it again and you'll see thats not what he said at all.

0 likes

Gene wrote:

dlgladwin wrote:

leather_girl wrote:

Well, I'm guessing only Hooky was in the interview so he said 'I', but of course we all know that all of the band members of JD wrote the album.

He still should have said we.

Why? To appease the sort of pedant that would pick up on suchlike?. This is not an issue. Please dont make it one.

Suppose an antagonistic ex-bandmate wanted to make it an issue?

If it's bad form to slag them off, it's equally so to imply that you did it all yourself.

0 likes

dlgladwin wrote: Suppose an antagonistic ex-bandmate wanted to make it an issue?

That would be their prerogative, I guess.

If it's bad form to slag them off, it's equally so to imply that you did it all yourself.

Yeah, but after re-reading it again Im not convinced that was the implication.

But I could be wrong. Its time for a brew.

0 likes

dlgladwin wrote:

Gene wrote:

dlgladwin wrote:

leather_girl wrote:

Well, I'm guessing only Hooky was in the interview so he said 'I', but of course we all know that all of the band members of JD wrote the album.

He still should have said we.

Why? To appease the sort of pedant that would pick up on suchlike?. This is not an issue. Please dont make it one.

Suppose an antagonistic ex-bandmate wanted to make it an issue?

If it's bad form to slag them off, it's equally so to imply that you did it all yourself.

After all the interviews he's done its clear that's not what he meant. All the other interviews keep stating over and over all the bandmates were responsible. It obviously was a slip of the tongue, that I realized someone would love to run off with, but figured it would be the Guardian...

0 likes

EdelBrock wrote: It obviously was a slip of the tongue, that I realized someone would love to run off with, but figured it would be the Guardian...

I never even noticed it until others did. Its just the same as if he'd been quoted as saying "..songs Id recorded 30 years ago...". Surely nobody would presume he meant he'd done Hannetts job for him.

Would they?

0 likes

"I'm a chancer, and I'd like to do New Order stuff, because I love it," Hook tells Spinner. "'Power Corruption and Lies,' 'Low-Life,' 'Movement' -- I think they're great records. Really, I think they deserve airing again. Why not?"

IS IT ME OR DID HOOKY AND BARNEY FORGOT THEY MADE ONE THEIR BEST ALBUM CALLED TECHNIQUE!!! Dont mean to be bias, I rather see New Order do a gig and pay $100 doing ONLY TECHNIQUE(plus single b sides) and maybe Here To Stay for an encore!!!!!

0 likes

Surely it's to do with money, loadsa money!

I'm sure the Movement & PC&L etc weren't played b/cos 'the band' felt that they no longer suited them and how they felt.

Suddenly it's an idea. Hope to fucking god that hooky doesn't tour them on his own

0 likes

Geno wrote: Surely it's to do with money, loadsa money!

I'm sure the Movement & PC&L etc weren't played b/cos 'the band' felt that they no longer suited them and how they felt.

Suddenly it's an idea. Hope to fucking god that hooky doesn't tour them on his own

I don't know about that but he did say in a Spin magazine interview posted on these forums that he's working on a JD biography. Here's the quote:

It's a biography called Inside Joy Division. I'm doing it because I was sick of reading books about Joy Division by people who weren't in Joy Division [laughs]. It was very hard work. I thought you journalists did nothing [laughs]. It was very cathartic and I was glad to get it all out.

0 likes

leather_girl wrote:

Geno wrote: Surely it's to do with money, loadsa money!

I'm sure the Movement & PC&L etc weren't played b/cos 'the band' felt that they no longer suited them and how they felt.

Suddenly it's an idea. Hope to fucking god that hooky doesn't tour them on his own

I don't know about that but he did say in a Spin magazine interview posted on these forums that he's working on a JD biography. Here's the quote:

It's a biography called Inside Joy Division. I'm doing it because I was sick of reading books about Joy Division by people who weren't in Joy Division [laughs]. It was very hard work. I thought you journalists did nothing [laughs]. It was very cathartic and I was glad to get it all out.

KER-CHING!

0 likes

I cannot see New Order, as a group, joining in with the current trend of performing early/debut albums. If Hooky wants to do it then good luck to him but it wont have the same draw as the full band doing it so there wont be so much money in it anyway.

And I really dont see the difference in Hooky playing JD/NO songs and say, Ralf Hutter and friends performing 'Neonlicht'

0 likes

And I really dont see the difference in Hooky playing JD/NO songs and say, Ralf Hutter and friends performing 'Neonlicht'

I think there's a lot of difference. Ralf is/was the singer for a start. Two of the current members have been in Kraftwerk far longer than Wolfgang and Karl were in the band, Henning Schmitz was even involved with Electric Cafe.

It's more likely compared to Karl doing Neon Lights (which he probably does).

0 likes

johnny james wrote:

And I really dont see the difference in Hooky playing JD/NO songs and say, Ralf Hutter and friends performing 'Neonlicht'

I think there's a lot of difference. Ralf is/was the singer for a start. Two of the current members have been in Kraftwerk far longer than Wolfgang and Karl were in the band, Henning Schmitz was even involved with Electric Cafe.

It's more likely compared to Karl doing Neon Lights (which he probably does).

:nod:

0 likes

johnny james wrote: It's more likely compared to Karl doing Neon Lights (which he probably does).

I thought that too but I didnt know if he did or not.

Hey, maybe its like when Erasure did DMs 'Just Cant Get Enough'?

I dont think that helps.:ignore:

0 likes

When I think of it, I've never heard of Mani re-recording Stone Roses songs for a new EP, or Alan Wilder re-recording old DM songs for a new EP etc...or anyone besides Hooky. In other words, very few people who used to be in famous bands actually try to do that.

0 likes

leather_girl wrote: When I think of it, I've never heard of Mani re-recording Stone Roses songs for a new EP, or Alan Wilder re-recording old DM songs for a new EP etc...or anyone besides Hooky. In other words, very few people who used to be in famous bands actually try to do that.

Hardly any Id imagine. Maybe ex-Beatles? However, plenty perform the songs live. Morrissey being the first name that comes to mind. Does anybody know whether Ian Brown does Stone Roses songs?

0 likes

Gene wrote:

leather_girl wrote: When I think of it, I've never heard of Mani re-recording Stone Roses songs for a new EP, or Alan Wilder re-recording old DM songs for a new EP etc...or anyone besides Hooky. In other words, very few people who used to be in famous bands actually try to do that.

Hardly any Id imagine. Maybe ex-Beatles? However, plenty perform the songs live. Morrissey being the first name that comes to mind. Does anybody know whether Ian Brown does Stone Roses songs?

That's my point. Many people do songs live---I've heard Ian does Stone Roses songs live---but not usually re-recording it like Hooky is trying to do.

But maybe the reason for all this criticism is that most people don't go further than that. They may play them live, but they don't go and re-record the songs deliberately for a new release.

0 likes

Id like to believe its not about the cash, am I being naive?

0 likes

Gene wrote: Id like to believe its not about the cash, am I being naive?

No, it sounds very plausible, in fact. Truth is, there's a lot of stuff about Joy Division, but none of it comes from its members. The closest thing is Deborah Curtis' Touching From a Distance. It would be a shame if there was nothing coming directly from the band, really.

0 likes

Gene wrote: Id like to believe its not about the cash, am I being naive?

To be honest I suspect there's very little cash to be had doing this. The downloads will make sod all, if there's vinyl it will only sell in limited quantities.

0 likes

Joy Division can never reform, there is no Ian! So him doing the tribute there, I can appreciate and understand, even though he has copped a lot of flack for that. But with doing New Order, well we know the singer is still alive and the rest of the band are too. This message board(and most of the NO fans/all the press) would go ballistic if he was to tour New Order albums without them. Am I wrong?

0 likes

condemnation wrote: This message board(and most of the NO fans/all the press) would go ballistic if he was to tour New Order albums without them. Am I wrong?

No.

0 likes

Ruined in a day wrote:

condemnation wrote: This message board(and most of the NO fans/all the press) would go ballistic if he was to tour New Order albums without them. Am I wrong?

No.

They seem to go ballistic whatever he does so I reckon its all the same.

0 likes

condemnation wrote: This message board(and most of the NO fans/all the press) would go ballistic if he was to tour New Order albums without them. Am I wrong?

Well, nobody goes ballistic about tribute bands that play only New Order covers (like Re: Order), right?

So, imagine if Hook showed up at a Re: Order gig and played bass for the night? Everyone would be psyched, right?

So then extrapolate that further: Hook starts to tour with Re: Order or makes his own tribute band with non-original new order members.

Why would that be profane, yet Hooky playing one night would not be?

0 likes

To be honest it's all living in the past and a bit rubbish however you do it.....move on!

0 likes

johnny james wrote: To be honest it's all living in the past and a bit rubbish however you do it.....move on!

totally agree. write new music. what is up with all this nostalgia? i'd say the same thing to Sumner playing JD songs at Bad Lieutenant gigs.

i remember a time when they wouldn't play joy division or the older hits or do encores, except special occasions.

i guess every night is a special occasion now. :rolleyes:

and then it was pretty cool when they did it as new order in the mid-2000s with 3 of the original members onstage together playing the stuff. but now there is no new order, and each of them is off covering the old songs on their own, it is just pathetic.

in 2012, we are going to see three new releases on different vanity record labels:

Peter Hook's Closer, Bernard Sumner's Closer, and The Other Two's Closer.

what a joke this is all turning out to be.

0 likes

To be fair though, BL has only released one album. Not all of the songs might sound good live, and if they only did the songs that sounded good live from that album, they'd be left with quite a short setlist. (The songs aren't that long in length either.) Also, many musicians play older material even when touring new albums. It's just that in Bernard's case, said older material literally goes back into the bands he used to be in.

I like to look the whole situation, however. Yes, Bernard has played NO/JD/Electronic songs during BL gigs. But also, he did manage to make a new album with his bandmates, and release a few new pieces of music via collaborations. Steve has done remixes for NIN, toured with BL, and so on. While Hooky has released some Freebass stuff, a lot of what we're hearing about these days about what he's doing relates either to JD or the Hacienda. Of course,how much nostalgia is too much or whatever is a 'your mileage may vary' situation. That is, it depends on the person.

Some people might not want any nostalgia. I'm not saying that Hooky is bad and the other guys are good, but I can understand why some people think that Hooky is going overboard with nostalgia stuff.

Also, Bernard once said in an interview published here around the time NCAT was released (roughly translated back into English by me): 'Even though I've started a new band, I won't be free from my past. But I want people to give the new songs a chance. It turned out wonderful, I'm proud of it, and if I were just repeating the past, I'd rather quit being a musician. '

0 likes

johnny james wrote: To be honest it's all living in the past and a bit rubbish however you do it.....move on!

I think I must enjoy living in the past then because if Im at a gig and I hear the words "This is a new song we're about to play" I always groan inwardly, go to the bar and wait to hear a tune I know!

0 likes

Gene wrote:

johnny james wrote: To be honest it's all living in the past and a bit rubbish however you do it.....move on!

I think I must enjoy living in the past then because if Im at a gig and I hear the words "This is a new song we're about to play" I always groan inwardly, go to the bar and wait to hear a tune I know!

Yep, it's all relative, remember seeing them in Feb 85 hoping to hear most of PCL and Movement and all the stuff in between and kept getting all this new stuff off Low Life:lol:

0 likes

Gene wrote:

johnny james wrote: To be honest it's all living in the past and a bit rubbish however you do it.....move on!

I think I must enjoy living in the past then because if Im at a gig and I hear the words "This is a new song we're about to play" I always groan inwardly, go to the bar and wait to hear a tune I know!

Your lucky. I'm usually holding the bar up only then to wake up the next day missing me favourite pair of Adidas samba's with little or no memory of the night

0 likes

Gene wrote:

johnny james wrote: To be honest it's all living in the past and a bit rubbish however you do it.....move on!

I think I must enjoy living in the past then because if Im at a gig and I hear the words "This is a new song we're about to play" I always groan inwardly, go to the bar and wait to hear a tune I know!

"This is a new song that we've never played before so bear with us if you will, it's called True Faith.."

0 likes

Gene wrote:

johnny james wrote: To be honest it's all living in the past and a bit rubbish however you do it.....move on!

I think I must enjoy living in the past then because if Im at a gig and I hear the words "This is a new song we're about to play" I always groan inwardly, go to the bar and wait to hear a tune I know!

this is the saddest thing i have ever read. i offer my condolences.

0 likes

cranelane wrote:

Gene wrote:

johnny james wrote: To be honest it's all living in the past and a bit rubbish however you do it.....move on!

I think I must enjoy living in the past then because if Im at a gig and I hear the words "This is a new song we're about to play" I always groan inwardly, go to the bar and wait to hear a tune I know!

"This is a new song that we've never played before so bear with us if you will, it's called True Faith.."

Yeah. Dont take me too seriously I was just trying to stick up for liking the past. Paradoxically, would people think "Oh for fucks sake, not True Faith again? Enough of this old shit!"

0 likes

I guess the longer a band have been in existence the less likely the new material would be any good anyway,people who go to see the Rolling Stones now for example are hardly likely to want to hear new material,but Bernard and Co are not quite in that dinosaur category yet.

0 likes

:shades:

0 likes

UpDownTurnAround wrote: :shades:

somebody was bored tonight eh?...

0 likes

Gene wrote:

leather_girl wrote: When I think of it, I've never heard of Mani re-recording Stone Roses songs for a new EP, or Alan Wilder re-recording old DM songs for a new EP etc...or anyone besides Hooky. In other words, very few people who used to be in famous bands actually try to do that.

Hardly any Id imagine. Maybe ex-Beatles? However, plenty perform the songs live. Morrissey being the first name that comes to mind. Does anybody know whether Ian Brown does Stone Roses songs?

Yes he does. If I recall rightly he sang a few at Glastonbury a few years back.

0 likes

Tarbox23 wrote:

johnny james wrote: To be honest it's all living in the past and a bit rubbish however you do it.....move on!

totally agree. write new music. what is up with all this nostalgia? i'd say the same thing to Sumner playing JD songs at Bad Lieutenant gigs.

i remember a time when they wouldn't play joy division or the older hits or do encores, except special occasions.

i guess every night is a special occasion now. :rolleyes:

and then it was pretty cool when they did it as new order in the mid-2000s with 3 of the original members onstage together playing the stuff. but now there is no new order, and each of them is off covering the old songs on their own, it is just pathetic.

in 2012, we are going to see three new releases on different vanity record labels:

Peter Hook's Closer, Bernard Sumner's Closer, and The Other Two's Closer.

what a joke this is all turning out to be.

It's all beginning to sound too much like Bucks Fizz for me! :nuts:

0 likes

Having now read all the contributions so far to this post, it does sound all a little too shite for the former members of New Order.

Hooky's Freebass split just as it was releasing its debut album, and BL's album material was that shit they were forced to play NO, JD and Electronic material at gigs. And kids, having finally heard the BL album in all its, ahem, 'glory, I can confirm it is indeed extremely fookin' shite.

This really is a headfook for the diehard fans. Maybe twenty years ago a NO side project was an exciting prospect, vis à vis Electronic's eponymous debut album, but not now. It just sounds like some old blokes, who should know better, scrapping around trying to find some justification for their waning talents.

NO's sum total was always greater than its individual parts, so come on lads - particularly you Mr. Hook - sort your fucking heads out and get the band back together, and finish off that fookin' album we were promised in 2006. If only for the fookin' money that you always used to complain you were fookin' due.

0 likes

Some good points, noorder.

The Bad Loot record had it's moments but they were probably too few and far between with that particular style of generic "indie rawk". We are a fussy bunch after all. There are a handful of good tunes on it though, or at least I think so... looking forward to a second LP. Who knows, Barney could push the envelope with the band's sound, chuck in a few drum machines and the odd keyboard... or erm, not. His recent Hot Chip collaboration has raised my hopes somewhat.

Freebass on the other hand - let's be honest - was a total disaster. The endless "it's gonna be great" interviews, the touted-then-dismissed collaboration rumours, the lengthy five year gestation period, Rourke mysteriously leaving, the half-good EP, the mediocre LP and last but not least Mani very publicly melting down on Twitter. Disaster is a mild term once you read the last sentence back tbh.

Moving on, it would definitely be nice to see Hooky do some new stuff and move away from the JD nostalgia as well as the burning wreckage of Freebass. Both Revenge and Monaco had their moments and when he was good (I.e. Wdywfm? Tender, Junk, Big Bang, State of Shock etc) he was really fucking good. Even the Hybrid stuff was excellent, more of that please. If 2011 brought us something like that I would be chuffed. Bernard's one off collaboration with Hot Chip is the kind of thing I mean... if Hooky did a couple of quick tracks like that with up and coming dance producers it could be good.

As for NO reformation, if it's just for a tour with the greatest hits setlist and cranking out LWTUA for the gazillionth I'd rather they stayed apart. If they start touring the NO albums individually then I've really lost interest, couldn't think of anything much worse.

0 likes

As for NO reformation, if it's just for a tour with the greatest hits setlist and cranking out LWTUA for the gazillionth I'd rather they stayed apart. If they start touring the albums individually then I've really lost interest, couldn't think of anything much worse.

I agree. :read:

0 likes

Denholm Reynholm wrote:

If they start touring the NO albums individually then I've really lost interest, couldn't think of anything much worse.

What about the reformation of JD (with new singer) that was on the cards a few years ago?

0 likes

noorder wrote: Having now read all the contributions so far to this post, it does sound all a little too shite for the former members of New Order.

Hooky's Freebass split just as it was releasing its debut album, and BL's album material was that shit they were forced to play NO, JD and Electronic material at gigs. And kids, having finally heard the BL album in all its, ahem, 'glory, I can confirm it is indeed extremely fookin' shite.

This really is a headfook for the diehard fans. Maybe twenty years ago a NO side project was an exciting prospect, vis à vis Electronic's eponymous debut album, but not now. It just sounds like some old blokes, who should know better, scrapping around trying to find some justification for their waning talents.

NO's sum total was always greater than its individual parts, so come on lads - particularly you Mr. Hook - sort your fucking heads out and get the band back together, and finish off that fookin' album we were promised in 2006. If only for the fookin' money that you always used to complain you were fookin' due.

Having fully heard the BL album myself, I can fully confirm that it's fucking excellent. Especially the tracks Sink or Swim, Poisonous Intent, This Is Home, Running Out of Luck, Runaway, Twist of Fate, and Summer Days, all of which sound like great New Order songs that are simply missing some awesome lead bass lines from Hooky....and that is basically what BL is....New Order without Hooky. Yes, Jake sings on a few tracks and does some backing vocals, but it's still late period New Order to me (Sumner/Morris/Cunningham)on most of the songs. I've got my own personal tracklist of it with what I think are the best BL songs....and it's still a ten track record.

And actually, a lot of the BL songs sounded great live. BL usually played 7-8 BL songs at their gigs, that is half the setlist, with the rest of the set being for older material..which is this case, since BL is composed of 3 members of New Order, two members of Joy Division, and is lead by the musical director of both JD and NO, it makes sense for them to play NO and JD tracks. When most bands tour a new album, they play 7 0r 8 songs from the new record, and then seven to ten older songs from previous records. As BL is a continuation of NO, I don't see what the issue is.

I don't mind Hooky doing his Unknown Pleasures tour....it's his call, and he isn't forcing anyone to go. It's 9:30 Pm here in NYC right now, I'm just about to get off of work, and Hooky is about to start playing. I'm not there because I had to work and didn't have the extra cash for the ticket..but part of me hopes the show goes really well.

I do agree with you that the best thing would happen would be for New Order to simply reunite....with Gillian on keyboards as well as Hook, Sumner, Morris, and Phil. It will probably never happen, but that would be the best for all concerned...if they could just bury the hatchet.

0 likes

you trying to piss off Sultan?

the youtube is rough, but it was actually pretty rawkin and fun in the club. just fun, not anything monumental or historic that needed a video made. it was Sultan's bday or something and Hooky was being a nice guy.

had to be there i suppose. :)

0 likes

You guys slagging Hooky for touring Unknown Pleasures are overlooking another, much higher profile example of a bassist touring a classic album without any of his previous bandmates: Roger Waters is doing The Wall (and has done Dark Side of the Moon in the past), only instead of a small family affair / tribute band / jam with friends kind of vibe, he's doing the full arena show the way it was "meant to be", and rather than pissing and moaning people are lining up around the block for it. Hell, the parallels continue: Waters even has his son in the band.

0 likes

Who cares about all this old shite, move on.

Stop living in the past and listen, watch, and play something relevant to this generation. There's so much great music about now and none of it made by Hooky.

0 likes

Chase wrote: You guys slagging Hooky for touring Unknown Pleasures are overlooking another, much higher profile example of a bassist touring a classic album without any of his previous bandmates: Roger Waters is doing The Wall (and has done Dark Side of the Moon in the past), only instead of a small family affair / tribute band / jam with friends kind of vibe, he's doing the full arena show the way it was "meant to be", and rather than pissing and moaning people are lining up around the block for it. Hell, the parallels continue: Waters even has his son in the band.

I think the reason why there's criticism of Hooky doing such things here is maybe because it's a JD/NO forum...plus, I think most of the people would have a stronger opinion about Hooky doing such because they are fans of Joy Division. I don't think all Pink Floyd fans necessarily love the idea of the guy doing The Wall, either.

0 likes

johnny james wrote: Stop living in the past and listen, watch, and play something relevant to this generation. There's so much great music about now...

Is there? Tynchy Stryder or Landfill Indie? Theres old bastards making stuff I like (Depeche Mode, Killing Joke etc) but according to many on here I shouldnt be listening to that because its from 'the past'.

Meh.

0 likes

Yes, loads, get looking.

And I did go and see Killing Joke recently and they were ace, which possibly on the face of it contradicts what I said before, but at least we're talking all original 4 members and a band that sounds as brilliant as they did in 1980, plus the new stuff is pretty good too. I'm also going to see The Pop Group soon, also more authentic in reformation than something with ONE original member performing mainly in a different role to the one that helped make the band great in the first instance! Not to mention that JD has been done TO DEATH and frankly I never want to hear anything other than the original performances/versions ever again!

0 likes

gurcan keltek wrote: http://twitter.com/#!/fuc51

:brow:

Shame that fuc51 are talking bollocks...:rolleyes:

:smoking:

0 likes

leather_girl wrote: I think the reason why there's criticism of Hooky doing such things here is maybe because it's a JD/NO forum...plus, I think most of the people would have a stronger opinion about Hooky doing such because they are fans of Joy Division.

Some here are acting as if it's Very Strange Behavior. My point is that not only is it not such an anomaly, it's actually been a very successful move elsewhere - sold-out shows at $250+ a seat.

leather_girl wrote: I don't think all Pink Floyd fans necessarily love the idea of the guy doing The Wall, either.

I'm sure they have their share of whiny bitches too.

Anyone who doesn't want to hear the Hook Family play Insight or New Dawn Fades is kindly invited to go find something else to listen to. Personally I'm happy to have paid $10 or $15 or whatever it was to be reminded of what a stomping good debut album Unknown Pleasures was, especially since I never had the luxury of hearing most of those songs live before. That doesn't mean I'm living in the past - I'd also be very happy to hear Hook do something worthy of his previous efforts, and for my money the most interesting bands these days are Stars (brilliant songwriting, intense live show, hell of a deep catalog 5 albums in) and Röyksopp (wouldn't mind hearing Hooky team up with them for a track or two).

0 likes

I'm quite sure that most of us here discussing this, no matter what we think of this JD tour, aren't 'whiny bitches', to use someone else's words.

0 likes

gurcan keltek wrote: a painful watch..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xr8xaSrfrsk

Plenty of bands have done this type of thing over the years, with friends. Sometimes other musicians get up and fuck the song up even worse!

The deal is here, that people have a gripe against Hooky and Sultan, and therefore love to stick the knife in! And with both doing 'Ceremony' together, what a great opportunity to do so.

The FUC51, is great for disgruntled ex friends and co-workers/associates of Hooky to publicly flame him. This is also not a new concept, happens to everyone! With the WORLD WIDE WANK, you can say what you like at the touch of a button. Even use the,"sorry I was drunk" clause the next day, if you get out of hand.

0 likes

I've not read this thread at all, I'm just replying to it to remind everyone of one thing. Right to the end, Hooky took being on stage seriously and every note he played, he played the best he could. He was the one who stuck up for us all in Liverpool and he is the one who waded into the crowd at Glastonbury. Barney was just taking the piss back then; he might have gone all serious now, but let's remember that Hooky is the only reason that many of us bothered to turn up in 05 and Rocktober.

There, I've said it.

0 likes

...and he never went fat

0 likes

Pablo Bastardo wrote: ...and he never went fat

:skeptic:

You didn't see him touring with Monaco (especially circa 1997) then, Col?

:evil4:

0 likes

I certainly enjoyed a shandy or two last night.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗