Skip to content

An Ideal for Reliving (Stephen Morris) From GQ Magazine

Archived

28 replies · 3,421 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

An Ideal for Reliving By Lee Gale

Snow is falling Christmas-card style in Kensington, an apt real-time video if you're listening to the icy tinkles of an ARP Omni 2 synthesizer on one of Joy Division's more elegiac compositions. Sickeningly, the sullenness is shattered as that ode to sad ski holidays, "Last Christmas" by Wham!, thumps through the flurry. Beyond the reach of Michael and Ridgeley's mulled-wine mitherings sit the toasty Warner Bros offices, where, surrounded by biscuits and Peter Saville artwork, rests Joy Division, New Order and Bad Lieutenant drummer/keyboardist Stephen Morris [pictured far right]. He's wearing chunky Caterpillar boots, hardly surprising as Macclesfield resembles Lapland right now. "You'll never guess where Bernard Sumner [Morris' bandmate] is at the moment," says a black T-shirted music exec. "Going round the world on a yacht." It's in stark contrast to Morris, who is meeting GQ.com to discuss +-, a boxset of Joy Division seven-inch records he's remastered with Frank Arkwright - a sound engineer notable for his work with Warp Records. It's a must for serious collectors, but will Santa decipher the peculiar positive/negative symbols on Christmas lists? That's the elves' problem, not yours.

GQ: How did the idea for +- come about? Wasn't Peter Saville responsible for the name of it?

Stephen Morris: Was he? Is he taking credit for it? Indirectly it was him. In 1988, we re-released [ Joy Division's] "Atmosphere" and on the inside sleeve there's a neon plus and minus. When it came to providing a name, that image cropped up. People wanted to actually call it Plus Minus - the words, but I said, "No, it's not going to be that." Saville huffed and puffed and said it looked like a religious symbol and I said, "No, Peter! No, Peter! Think of a car battery!" I don't think he's seen a car battery. I explained what a car battery looked like and he kind of warmed to the idea of it being a + and -.

And +- will probably sit at the top of your iTunes library.

Yes - where would it go? There's lots of pros to it.

How do you start remastering a track?

Find it first. You basically have to go and find all the bloody tapes and listen to them all and find out which is the right one.

Do you have out-takes on these tapes?

Everything - stuff that you never even knew existed.

Is that how you were able to do the "Love Will Tear Us Apart (Pennine Version)", which appears on +-?

The Pennine version has always been there - it was on the b-side of the 12-inch when it first came out. But it wasn't called "The Pennine Mix" or anything like that, it was just "Love Will Tear Us Apart" but a slightly different version. That version was the way we always played it live. The one that everybody knows, I actually hate.

Why, because it's too poppy?

Just because of the bad, emotional things. Martin Hannett [ Joy Division record producer] played one of his mind games when we were recording it - it sounds like he was a tyrant, but he wasn't, he was nice. We had this one battle where it was nearly midnight and I said, "Is it all right if I go home, Martin - it's been a long day?" And he said [whispers], "OK… you go home." So I went back to the flat. Just got to sleep and the phone rings. "Martin wants you to come back and do the snare drum." At four in the morning! I said, "What's wrong with the snare drum!?" So every time I hear "Love Will Tear Us Apart", I grit my teeth and remember myself shouting down the phone, "YOU BASTARD!" [smashes up imaginary phone.] I can feel the anger in it even now. It's a great song and it's great production, but I do get anguished every time I hear it.

When remastering, are you able to lift the quality of certain instruments and electronic sounds?

You EQ it, and sometimes there's little glitches you can get rid of. One of the things I've found in my years doing this is the sound of vinyl changes. There are certain fads. One year they must have said, "Oh we like bright records." Other years it's, "We like records with lots of top on." And then it suddenly becomes a fad that record companies don't like records that are too bright.

So vinyl sound goes through fashion, just like clothing?

It does. It's very, very subtle. You listen to Simon & Garfunkel on vinyl now and it sounds absolutely fantastic. The solid quality - it's brilliant! How did they get these records to sound like that? The big thing now with iPods - I'm getting old, I can moan about this now 'cos I've got a licence to - is everything gets compressed. It's a thing you can do with digital. If you looked at the sound pattern of an old-fashioned record it would be very spikey. But nowadays there's no spikes - everything looks like a brick, so the quiet bits become louder. It's actually damaging because it's like listening to a drill. Drrrrrrrrrrr! On stuff you listen to on your iPod, it can really do your hearing in.

So is there a reason behind the release?

We're going back to May this year - we tried to do this exhibition in Macclesfield which sort of happened, but wasn't as big as it was supposed to be.

An exhibition?

Well, Ian [Curtis, Joy Division's late singer] was from Macclesfield, and I got a phone call one day and they said, "We'd like to do an exhibition celebrating Ian's life.' And it was 30 years [since his death] and it was in Macclesfield, so I said, "Yes, OK, let's do it." Then recession, blah-de-blah-de-blah, people losing jobs, and it happened but in a very diluted form. This is one of the things that came from it and carried on going.

The early Joy Division material is difficult to find on vinyl.

It is. I'm surprised how many people are into vinyl. For a start, my daughter, she's like [pretends to hold 12-inch vinyl in the air], "Oh look! A record! What's this? It's brilliant!" And then recently she saw a cassette for the first time: "A cassette! It's great! What do you do with it?" She sticks them on her wall, 'cos they're great objects in themselves. I had to do a vinyl record not so long back. So I rang up some people who press records and they said, "Sorry, we're full up." "Full up?" "Yes, we're turning people away."

It's more of an event buying a record.

In the Seventies, album artwork became really beautiful items. The whole process of doing an album sleeve, it became a very artistic thing. Just look at the stuff Saville did for us. He doesn't do many album sleeves any more. Nobody does, come to that. But they're really beautiful things and that's something that I really miss. With CDs, the case falls to bits and the piece of paper falls out.

And people just download now.

There's nothing to look at. But we've done this [ Joy Division] iTunes LP.

A downloadable version of +-?

Yes, it'll be out soon. It's got an interview with me included, some live stuff, and one track nobody's heard before and, call me insane, but the thing I really like about it is, you select the track and it comes up and starts spinning round on the screen. That's brilliant! It's like a proper record! And then it turns round. Simple things. A kid would look at it and go, "Why's it doing that? You can't read it." But when you're an old git - aaaaaah. It's like a jukebox!

If Ian hadn't died, how big do you think Joy Division would have become - U2-sized?

We wouldn't have been a U2. I think U2 found a gap in the market. It's pointless to speculate. If I'm honest, I don't think we would have carried on anyway because of Ian's illness [epilepsy, depression, wrong tablets to treat depression]. I think we'd have knocked the whole thing on the head.

Hooky [Joy Division and New Order bassist] was in GQ.com a few weeks ago. He was touring Joy Division's Unknown Pleasures Down Under, with Rowetta from Happy Mondays taking Ian Curtis' singing duties. What are you thoughts on that?

It's funny you should mention it - I've been in touch with Susan Boyle's management and she's doing a version of "Atrocity Exhibition".

It's hard to imagine Rowetta singing "Dead Souls" - "Imperialistic house of prayer/Conquistadors who took their share".

I can't see it either.

Out of all the music equipment you've ever owned, is there anything that has a special place in your heart?

There's one - and Bernard goes on at me about it. I've just bought it again. It's the drum machine that we did "Blue Monday" on. The Oberheim DMX drum machine. Bernard said, "What the bloody hell did you get that for?" It's hard to explain, but it's just so much fun. You can't do much with it.

Is it easy to use?

Yes! It's difficult to explain that a machine has a human feel. You can fall on it, kick it, and it'll still sound like Prince. You can do anything on it. It's like a toy. I do enjoy it. It was a pain at the time, though.

Are you making music at the moment?

We're doing another Other Two album… although it probably won't be an album, because I don't really want to do one. It's probably going to be five tracks. I'm just waiting for the missus [Gillian Gilbert, New Order's guitarist and synth player] to do some singing. I might have to sing one myself, if only as a threat to get Gillian to do some proper singing. We'll do five tracks, then another five tracks, then another.

Are some tracks already done?

We just need the singing. I've done enough collaborations, and there's nothing wrong with collaborating, but this time I just want it to be us.

Keep it in-house.

In-house, yes. I've got a nice house. And we've started doing another Bad Lieutenant album. Oh yes, and my book.

An autobiography?

Not in a way that you'd expect.

Are you writing it in the third person?

Kind of. It might actually be a novel. You'll have to wait till it comes out.

You seem to be an habitual T-shirt wearer. Where do you source T-shirts from - the internet, or do you get them sent to you?

I go to Selfridges! Actually, this one I've got on says "Ice Cream" on it. It's a Billionaire Boys Club one.

If you were forced to choose your favourite New Order track, what would it be?

Just at the minute it's "Bizarre Love Triangle".

And Joy Division?

Obviously "Atrocity Exhibition".

The new Susan Boyle version?

With Susan Boyle singing - that's my favourite Joy Division track. No, erm… "Colony".

+- is out now, and limited to 5,000 copies, price £49.99. The first 500 deluxe boxsets, including custom-made Peter Saville artwork and priced £75, sold out pre-release. rhino.co.uk

http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/entertainment/articles/2010-12/17/gq-music-stephen-morris-joy-division-interview

0 likes

Cheers Linus.

He's one dry bastard, that Steve Morris. Top bloke.

0 likes

"and one track nobody's heard before" Wonder what will that be?

0 likes

Good interview, thanks for that. I completely agree with him on the Pennine version of LWTUA too, always much preferred it to the actual 12" version. The faster pace, lighter vocal and overall tempo better suits the melody but (obviously) they're both good versions. It was the lead off track on Permanent 1995 so pretty much the first JD track I ever heard.

Regarding +- it's sad as Steve seems clearly into the boxset in terms of compiling it and had the best intentions... it's just a shame Warners went and fucked it all up royally. He must have his head in his hands from all the people receiving the wrong product or defective items (the etching). A shame. I hope it doesn't put him off compiling future New Order reissues as he's clearly the only member of the band who seems to give a shit about their back catalogue at the moment. There's a treasure trove of stuff there to be enjoyed with the right presentation.

It sounds like TO2 are doing a mini-album or EP approach which is being more and more adopted by bands these days (James did it successfully last year with The Morning After/The Night Before mini-albums). Albums do seem a bit slavish to do these days, I'd prefer all my favourite bands to put out the occasional five or six quality tracks rather than wring out a 12 track effort with inevitable filler. Less more frequently please. So good news there.

It's nice to read a member of the band not going on about money persistently or how much he lost on a certain nightclub. Bit refreshing that :laugh:

0 likes

It's nice to hear from Steve, too.

:read:

0 likes

It was very interesting hearing his take on the future of Joy Division if Ian had lived...

I always hear that speculation of "What do you think Joy Division's music would sound like if Ian had lived?" and it's very interesting to hear, point blank from someone involved, that most likely there wouldn't have been any music because the band would have had to pack it in due to the illness.

0 likes

rowetta didn't even go to australia with us

and she'd never sing dead souls anyway - a song we haven't even played.

lazy journalism. cool interview tho.

0 likes

cranelane wrote: "and one track nobody's heard before" Wonder what will that be?

The itunes LP is already out. The unheard track he is talking about is the video of "Colony" from the second night of the Manchester Apollo that was left off Here Are The Young Men (they used the Eindhoven version on the original video)

0 likes

doesnt actually say that she does sing it though jack, just that it would be hard to imagine. which is true.

new bl album as well as to2, so more new product wonder if you'll have to buy all the set to get the new jd track

0 likes

loved the interview. love the new o2 material which was mentioned on their site. Love the fact that new BL album is underway. Maybe the come to America for that one. Would be nice, but if the tour is due after 12/12/12 you never know. Damn Mayan calendar.....

0 likes

hibster wrote: doesnt actually say that she does sing it though jack, just that it would be hard to imagine. which is true.

new bl album as well as to2, so more new product wonder if you'll have to buy all the set to get the new jd track

Typical journalist mouthing off without the correct information. It does say that she came to Oz, which isn't true, regardless if she sang "They walked in line" or "Incubation".

Interesting to hear about the drums for "Love will tear us apart", I always thought they were overdubbed, as the snare is out of time in spots and the feel is weird.

0 likes

"And we've started doing another Bad Lieutenant album", How can they be working on a new BL album when Bernard is sailing around the world, LOL

0 likes

linus sulanki wrote: "And we've started doing another Bad Lieutenant album", How can they be working on a new BL album when Bernard is sailing around the world, LOL

He's probably working on his lyrics..

0 likes

cranelane wrote:

He's probably working on his lyrics..

First few lines are finished:

Sailing round the world in may, in the corner you should stay, hey, man what you doing now, tell me more about the cow.

0 likes

Ruined in a day wrote:

cranelane wrote:

He's probably working on his lyrics..

First few lines are finished:

Sailing round the world in may, in the corner you should stay, hey, man what you doing now, tell me more about the cow.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

0 likes

linus sulanki wrote: "And we've started doing another Bad Lieutenant album", How can they be working on a new BL album when Bernard is sailing around the world, LOL

no need to be in the same place to work on the same project...

0 likes

I think it's a bit snotty of him to diss Rowetta and Hooky's music like that. Their version of Atmosphere is a cracking rendition. What's with all this Joy Division veneration business - no art is above new intrepration. Even Joy Division. This `worshipful' attitude is very unFactory methinks.

At least, Hook can't be criticised for `chasing the money' now. Steven is all over promoting this (Arguably uncessary) Joy Division release. He even interrupts my listening on Spotify to do it! At least Hook is bringing the audience something relatively new.

Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?

0 likes

Never read so many things wrong in a reply, foxy. Even the Johnny Rotten quote at the end which is often gets the wrong usage by people who think it was completely directed at the audience rather than at the singer himself.

Personally, I don't think Stephen was "dissing" anyone really, he seemed very non-committal about what Hooky is up to. He seemed to just agree that he couldn't "imagine" Rowetta doing that particular track which is neither positive or negative ('scuse the pun) and as the original drummer of Joy Division clearly his right to express. I couldn't "imagine" it either, it doesn't mean that I don't think Rowetta is a fine singer.

I think he probably means that the Joy Division tracks are so indelibly linked to Ian's voice that anyone probably including Bernard and Hooky having a go would sound... hard to imagine. Dissing it ain't. Statement of fact it is. He was there for the 1980 New Order vocalist auditions so I'm sure he knows better than most. Besides Bernard singing JD tracks at NO gigs over the years has always produced a mixed reaction from fans. Hooky or Rowetta singing them was never going to be any different. I've been to Hooky's UP show as well and it took me a few songs to get used to it all.

I'm sure you could email Bad Lieutenant's management to inform Steve you are cross with him for interrupting your free Spotify splurge. Now that probably is "snotty" of him to expect you to shell out for his music while you're streaming lots of it for free. Especially as in your words he's allegedly chasing pound signs now.

:shrug:

0 likes

I think it's a bit snotty of him to diss Rowetta and Hooky's music like that.

...it's HIS music too you know, and he has a right to say whatever he likes. What he did say wasn't exactly critical anyway. If anything it's clear he's avoiding the issue, provocatively brought up by the journalist, with a throwaway line.

As for 'chasing the money', don't try to create divisions where there aren't any, Steven promoting the release serves all of them, including Hooky, since what he's promoting is an original product not his own interpretation of JD.

0 likes

I cant be fucked with all this "he meant this" or "he dissed so and so" bollocks.

I always enjoy his interviews as they're un-pretentious, amusing and slightly self deprecating (is that spelt right? Dont care).

Very much looking forward to new TO2 material.

0 likes

Gene wrote: I cant be fucked with all this "he meant this" or "he dissed so and so" bollocks.

I always enjoy his interviews as they're un-pretentious, amusing and slightly self deprecating (is that spelt right? Dont care).

Very much looking forward to new TO2 material.

Seconded!

0 likes

Rorschach wrote:

Gene wrote: I cant be fucked with all this "he meant this" or "he dissed so and so" bollocks.

I always enjoy his interviews as they're un-pretentious, amusing and slightly self deprecating (is that spelt right? Dont care).

Very much looking forward to new TO2 material.

Seconded!

Thirded. Only replace 'new TO2' with 'new BL'.

0 likes

No 1. Steven can say whatever he likes. I'm not arguing about his right to free speech.

However, it is still `dissing', even tho Steven wrote the original with Hooky, Ian and Bernard. There is clearly some amount of disrespect for what Hooky/Rowetta are doing.

Anything can be dissed in such a way. It doesn't matter who/where/what/how the original was made. Language is far more subtle and malleable than that.

Also, I agree, I usually love reading interviews with Steven. He is a great interviewee and I love his drumming/contribution to the band to the max.

However, I personally do not like him going along with all this Hook-belittling that's gone on over the last few years. They may have had their problems and had to split, that's fine. But they should decline to comment on eachother's work. (Applies to Hooky too). Otherwise they are never going to get back together.

Lastly, I've bought more NO/JD/E/02 product in my life than ANY other band (all albums, DVDs, some gigs etc.) And I rarely listen to them on spotify. And yet because I listen to bands similar to them, I am the `target audience' and thus hit with what I consider to be this undignified advert. (Incidentally, music on Spotify is NOT free. It only feels that way. You pay with your time, attention, and personality being exposed to advertisers)

Now fair enough, all adverts are undigified in some way, and all re-releases and cover gigs are too. And I understand that Steve, Hooky and the rest may still have mortages to pay etc. So good luck to them. What I am saying is that they are all still `cashing in', just in different ways, so they shouldn't act superior about it. No matter how charming and witty they may say it.

Also telling someone to `Write a letter of complaint to the management if you don't like it' is the kind of response I'd expect from a supermarket manager. Since when has the attitude of NO fans been so corporatist?

0 likes

foxystarship wrote: No 1. Steven can say whatever he likes. I'm not arguing about his right to free speech.

However, it is still `dissing', even tho Steven wrote the original with Hooky, Ian and Bernard. There is clearly some amount of disrespect for what Hooky/Rowetta are doing.

Anything can be dissed in such a way. It doesn't matter who/where/what/how the original was made. Language is far more subtle and malleable than that.

Also, I agree, I usually love reading interviews with Steven. He is a great interviewee and I love his drumming/contribution to the band to the max.

However, I personally do not like him going along with all this Hook-belittling that's gone on over the last few years. They may have had their problems and had to split, that's fine. But they should decline to comment on eachother's work. (Applies to Hooky too). Otherwise they are never going to get back together.

Even if they didn't talk about each other's work, that doesn't guarantee that they will reform. :scratch:

Saying that you can't imagine someone doing something doesn't mean that they are disrespectful, or that they are saying something negative---at least to my ears, he doesn't seem to be dissing Hooky or Rowetta. But that's how I read the quote, and maybe you might look at the quote differently.

0 likes

Sigh.

foxystarship wrote: However, it is still `dissing', even tho Steven wrote the original with Hooky, Ian and Bernard. There is clearly some amount of disrespect for what Hooky/Rowetta are doing.

Rubbish and at least three other users in this thread excluding me have pointed out that this is not what they've read in those words. Only you seem to have jumped to that conclusion. Also, your opinion doesn't tally with what Steve's said in the past regarding Hooky which has almost never been negative.

foxystarship wrote: However, I personally do not like him going along with all this Hook-belittling that's gone on over the last few years. They may have had their problems and had to split, that's fine. But they should decline to comment on eachother's work. (Applies to Hooky too). Otherwise they are never going to get back together.

I don't see any Hook-belittling in this interview. I'm very clear on what the term "belittle" means and I don't see any of that here. Personally, I don't think it's for fans like you or me to tell the band how to speak about each other in public. They can say what they like. Realistically, Hooky has been the most blunt since 2006 when commenting on New Order although he has calmed down to be pretty diplomatic of late. By contrast Stephen has consistently demonstrated he's not interested in falling out with anyone. Where is this belittling going on?

foxystarship wrote: (Incidentally, music on Spotify is NOT free. It only feels that way. You pay with your time, attention, and personality being exposed to advertisers)

Diddums :laugh: stop splitting hairs. By even the loosest term of the word "free" you get to listen to music without parting with a penny. Even the biggest cheapskate would admit Spotify is free. The ratio of adverts to minutes listening to music is small enough to make it pretty non-obtrusive.

foxystarship wrote: Also telling someone to `Write a letter of complaint to the management if you don't like it' is the kind of response I'd expect from a supermarket manager. Since when has the attitude of NO fans been so corporatist?

Not at all. We live in an age where most of our favourite bands are on Facebook or Myspace and are easily contactable by their fans. I was serious. If you are upset with Stephen directing an "undignified" advertisement while you listen to loads of music for free then you should definitely tell him.

I'd also say that there is something more "supermarket manager" and "corporatist" about whinging about what Stephen is doing and then when told how you could address it moaning that everyone is somehow uncool. We can't all be as "punk rock" as some I suppose.

0 likes

Personally I think Steve's a loveable nerd. Great music, but you'da thought after over 30 years he'd've learnt to look an interviewer in the face.

0 likes

Douglas Reynholm wrote: Never read so many things wrong in a reply, foxy. Even the Johnny Rotten quote at the end which is often gets the wrong usage by people who think it was completely directed at the audience rather than at the singer himself.

Personally, I don't think Stephen was "dissing" anyone really, he seemed very non-committal about what Hooky is up to. He seemed to just agree that he couldn't "imagine" Rowetta doing that particular track which is neither positive or negative ('scuse the pun) and as the original drummer of Joy Division clearly his right to express. I couldn't "imagine" it either, it doesn't mean that I don't think Rowetta is a fine singer.

I think he probably means that the Joy Division tracks are so indelibly linked to Ian's voice that anyone probably including Bernard and Hooky having a go would sound... hard to imagine. Dissing it ain't. Statement of fact it is. He was there for the 1980 New Order vocalist auditions so I'm sure he knows better than most. Besides Bernard singing JD tracks at NO gigs over the years has always produced a mixed reaction from fans. Hooky or Rowetta singing them was never going to be any different. I've been to Hooky's UP show as well and it took me a few songs to get used to it all.

I'm sure you could email Bad Lieutenant's management to inform Steve you are cross with him for interrupting your free Spotify splurge. Now that probably is "snotty" of him to expect you to shell out for his music while you're streaming lots of it for free. Especially as in your words he's allegedly chasing pound signs now.

:shrug:

++

I really don't see ANY ill-will in that interview with Morris. If he had wanted to diss Hooky, you would know it.

He has one line about it, really, following a loaded question from the interviewer. If he wanted to dismiss Hooky, he could have easily let loose there. If you've ever read any of his interviews around 1993 about Tony Wilson, you know what I am talking about.

Instead, he is just like, "yeah, I can't see that either" - because, come on, it IS a bit of a bizarre idea.

Personally, I love how she sings the Joy Division material (actually, love how she sings anything). But before I heard her on it, I was a little unsure of how it was going to work out, and it COULD have been a disaster, but she has the soul to carry it out...

0 likes

Loved this interview, thanks for posting it.

Gives me hope for new material in 2011 in the form of Bad Lieutenant and Other Two.

0 likes

foxystarship wrote: Also telling someone to `Write a letter of complaint to the management if you don't like it' is the kind of response I'd expect from a supermarket manager.

:abovelol: That was a good one, made me chuckle.

Still dont care though.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗