NotAMod wrote:
GlasVegas wrote:
Just find it strange that one person's act, The Light, is seen as as being entirely money driven and in bad taste while New Order v2, doing a nostalgia tour, is seen as being about something else, something more artistic and somehow more 'worthy'.
To be a smart-alec in return
this reunion is relatively recent thing and only this time last year Bernard, Phil and Steve were still touring Bad Lieutenant - promoting original material with a few JD/NO classics thrown in primarily due to the singer and drummer's notoriety.
Whatever people think of the BL album itself or the shows they put on, Bernard and Steve definitely took the initial non cash-in route writing new material and playing both at home and abroad in much smaller venues than they were used to at NO's peak. For someone who hated playing live, Bernard certainly dragged that album out on the road despite knowing it was probably going to make a paltry return under an unknown name. If they was "cashing in" surely they would have gone straight to performing "Round & Round" as "New Order" in 2009?
Freebass who heavily traded on Manc bassist superstar credentials couldn't really keep the various egos in check to be a viable touring entity. The Light have toured as nostalgia from day one which is why some fans were probably drawing comparisons between the others and Hooky up until recently. I do agree though, there's nothing wrong with a bit of nostalgia. I've seen The Light at least once, they did the music justice and from what I've read give regularly to epilepsy charities and deserve respect for that.
It's also true that now there is little difference between what The Light and New Order do; they merely cover different areas of a shared back catalogue with different approaches I.e. The Light favour "album concept" sets whereas NO do "best of" sets. The only thing which would define which you enjoy more is whether you prefer Joy Division or New Order. Or how much of the original band you want to see on stage (the controversial bit).
Well said, NotAMod.
Mind you, if New Order (the current lineup) continue to just tour older New Order songs for many years from now without doing anything new, then I will criticise. Or, if someone in the band says (in an interview, for example) that they will never write anything new under any circumstance as a musician, whether as New Order, or under a different name, or under a side project/collaboration, then I will criticise them for being stuck in the past. Some of the collaborations Hooky did were great (that Autokratz song etc), but Hooky seems more reluctant than the other members to make anything new, for whatever reason. (That's how I see it; I don't know exactly what Hooky feels.) His frequent talking about internet and downloading and how he seems to feel it's difficult to make money on new material further reinforces this impression.
Also, some of the 'newer' New Order songs they've played are from the 1990s and early to mid 2000s. (Here to Stay, Krafty are from the 2000s). But the newest JD material is from the early 1980s. So both may be nostalgia, but JD is even more older. I'm sure Freebass could've gigged a bit, like BL did, but Hooky seems to have chosen touring JD albums (touring music that is well-known and 30 years old, as opposed to touring new Freebass material+maybe some older JD hits mixed).
Mind you, I'm not criticising, but I'm pointing out some things that may affect people's perceptions of the two groups.