Skip to content

All other things being equal, would you take it or leave it?

Archived

39 replies · 589 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

If everything else stayed the same, would you take or leave Barney's live whoops?

Closed
  • Really Leave It - Worse than Michael Jackson's grunts 5 (11%)
  • Barely Leave It - They are mildly annoying and detracting 7 (15%)
  • Ridin' The Fence - I have fewer opinions than dead people 3 (6%)
  • Barely Take It - I think they are a good part of New Order 22 (47%)
  • Really Take It - They should change all lyrics to whoops 8 (17%)
  • Confused - What the heck? I thought this was a Cure site 2 (4%)

47 votes · voting closed

Originally posted by Al Jarvis > Originally posted by Wolfmann> I say Barely Leave It - if there were much fewer of them and not in songs like Atmosphere, I would like it better.

Er, Wolfie, my friend, you've never seen New Order live, so why comment?

I don't see what's wrong with the odd whoop during Atmosphere; how do we know Curtis wouldn't have been whooping it up himself, had he been alive today.

Newsflash - you don't have to SEE something in order to HEAR something - different senses there.

I'd be willing to wager lots of $ seeing NO while hearing Barney whoop during songs like IALP and Atmosphere would only make it worse. Kind of like seeing a picture of a pile or crap vs. having to see it and smell it - it just gets worse with every sense that you add.

0 likes

Originally posted by Tout est devenu vert I like the whoops, except in JD songs. The Barnster has got an incredible ability to fuck up Atmosphere when he starts whooping in it. But he would fuck it up otherwise as well, so... I'm keeping the whoops.

:nod: :clap:

0 likes

Originally posted by Wolfmann > > Newsflash - you don't have to SEE something in order to HEAR something - different senses there.

You're taking it out of context. If you weren't there, I don't see how you can comment. And some of us do bother seeing New Order live so it's not really someone's place who can't be arsed to be lecturing us on what we should/shouldn't hear, now is it?

And how do people know Curtis wouldn't have ended up being a 47 year old arse, as I assume is being implied that Barney is. Look at Sumner 20+ years ago - miserablism personified on stage. And now look at the little fella. Curtis already had the dickhead dance, perhaps he could've developed the whooping too?

I do love all these Joy Division songs coming out of the woodwork though. If only Curtis knew he had all these fans, perhaps he might not have been so depressed.

0 likes

I'm with Mr Jarvis on this one.New Order have always been a warts and all live experience.You pay your money you take your choice.

0 likes

Originally posted by Al Jarvis > Originally posted by Wolfmann> > > > > > Newsflash - you don't have to SEE something in order to HEAR something - different senses there.>

You're taking it out of context. If you weren't there, I don't see how you can comment. And some of us do bother seeing New Order live so it's not really someone's place who can't be arsed to be lecturing us on what we should/shouldn't hear, now is it?

And how do people know Curtis wouldn't have ended up being a 47 year old arse, as I assume is being implied that Barney is. Look at Sumner 20+ years ago - miserablism personified on stage. And now look at the little fella. Curtis already had the dickhead dance, perhaps he could've developed the whooping too?

I do love all these Joy Division songs coming out of the woodwork though. If only Curtis knew he had all these fans, perhaps he might not have been so depressed.

It's not an issue of bothering to see New Order. If they come anywhere near me, I will go see them. I have a family to think about, so I ain't a goin' to fly somewhere to see them. My hat goes off to those who can afford to do that, but I cannot... it doesn't mean that I am any less of a fan though. Also, don't get too down on my opinion as several other people (who have seen them) feel the same way. I didn't start this thread to get everyone to accept my opinions (as uninformed as they are), I merely wanted to find out what others thought.

P.S. I never hung out with Ian, so I my opinion on the whole "Would Ian be whooping" thing won't apparently be of any value, so I will let other people address that.

0 likes

Originally posted by Infinite apathy as long as he doesn't dance, I don't mind.

Damned bloody right. I have the 316 dvd and man....the whoops are awesome but the dancing......let's just say it can be a big daggy at times trying to show it off to 2000's generation...

0 likes

I like when he whoops right before the chorus in Bizarre Love Triangle. I'd feel like something was missing if he didn't.

0 likes

yeh, maybe hooky should be give a mike so he could 'woop' as well.

0 likes

I don't mind it as long as he doesn't over do it.

0 likes

Originally posted by Grell yeh, maybe hooky should be give a mike so he could 'woop' as well.

I wonder what it would be like if they could whoop in parts? Maybe a tenor and baritone dual whoop would be really pretty? Add Gillian and you could have a nice Trio... like the 3 Tenors, but not all tenors... or men.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗