Skip to content

Temptation???

Archived

17 replies · 551 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Which version of Temptation is the definative?

Closed
  • Temptation 1982 12" and 7" original recorded versions 37 (77%)
  • Temptation 1987 Substance version 7 (15%)
  • Temptation 1998 version 4 (8%)

48 votes · voting closed

don't think this has gotten decided yet... i didn't think that the 1982 12" and 7" versions should compete against each other.

0 likes

The 1982 version, the cornerstone of New Order's transformation from Joy Division emulators to an innovative electronic dance act that still knew how to rock.

0 likes

Option 4. I never liked Temptation.

:D:D:D:D:D anita

0 likes

Substance-era Temptation got me into NewOrder.

So Blue Monday it is. Wait, no. Sorry, Age of Consent.

0 likes

Originally posted by anita Option 4. I never liked Temptation.:D:D:D:D:Danita

There must be something between FAC 63 and chicks...... I couldn't believe my ears when someone I knew told me she could not stand that song.......I went..WHATTT!!!??? My all-time fav. deemed unlistenable????!! well...def. something about FAC 63 and chicks.....( and it really hurts me to be treated this way....)

Hee-Hee... by the way, you guys missed out TEMPTATION edit ( from SOMETHING WILD ) which is really quite diferent from the other mixes.....

0 likes

I voted for the original 12 and 7'. However, the live version from the NYC Ukranian concert should be mention. It comes at the end of the Movement set in proto-Temptational form. Great to see a work in progress.

Honorable mention to Temptation 98, I like its speed.

0 likes

12' Version of Temptation '82 is Brilliant, i think the only version of the song i like better is the "saturday Live" Version from bbc2 in '84

0 likes

Originally posted by Find-My-'Bowl'-As-I-Go-Home > Originally posted by anita> Option 4. I never liked Temptation.> > > :D:D:D:D:D> anita

There must be something between FAC 63 and chicks...... I couldn't believe my ears when someone I knew told me she could not stand that song.......I went..WHATTT!!!??? My all-time fav. deemed unlistenable????!! well...def. something about FAC 63 and chicks.....( and it really hurts me to be treated this way....)

Hee-Hee... by the way, you guys missed out TEMPTATION edit ( from SOMETHING WILD ) which is really quite diferent from the other mixes.....

I REALLY have tried to like Temptation. Honest.

:( anita, not worthy

0 likes

the original 12". the longer the better. :nod:

0 likes

Originally posted by AgentWood the original 12". the longer the better. :nod:

Hmmmm...gonna go with the edited 87 version from 24hpp...it's about the motion in the ocean.

But fat props will go out to the 82 7".

0 likes

Substance version... better vocal, better arrangement, better sound...

0 likes

I prefer the 87 version over the original for sure.. it's for a reason they re-recorded it in 1987 :D

But the 1998 version totally rocks, its only problem for most of us would be the length, but I seriously think this is the best single version of Temptation ever done.. really good when you do a CD of shorter versions to have more tracks on your CD ;)

0 likes

well, to be honest i can't decide ... the original is full of energy and is great, honest, and very important in the history of NO, but i can see why the band wanted to remake it in 1987, the 1982 seem produced so loud and treble-end, and Barney's vocals sound funny. the 1998 version has the drums buried in the mix, the complete opposite of the 1982 versions.
so my answer is that i can't decide

maybe this would be a good time to rerelease "Temptation" as a single, with all the versions on one CD to help promote Retro, International, and Finsbury Park DVD... nahhh, that might make some sense.

0 likes

New Order's (unofficial!) statement with regard to their interpretation of 're-mix, re-release, re-hash!, and/or re-record.

"IF WE CAN FLEECE MORE CASH OUT OF THE MUGS LET'S DO IT"!

DM

0 likes

Definitely Temptation 82 vintage. Can't be beaten.... the vocals, drums, sound effects at end,primitive synths and synth solo in the 12" are sublime... sound on the 7" different but equally alluring. The version on Taraschvenko is also sublime.

Don't know why they re-recorded this classic.

B

0 likes

Originally posted by David Molyneux New Order's (unofficial!) statement with regard to their interpretation of 're-mix, re-release, re-hash!, and/or re-record."IF WE CAN FLEECE MORE CASH OUT OF THE MUGS LET'S DO IT"!DM

No one forces anyone to buy it. Anyhow, they need to claw back the money lost to all those mp3 downloaders somehow...

As long as it doesn't divert one second of time from doing some new material I don't mind remakes/remixes.

I like the 98 version, but the original 12" rules.

0 likes

Originally posted by David Molyneux New Order's (unofficial!) statement with regard to their interpretation of 're-mix, re-release, re-hash!, and/or re-record."IF WE CAN FLEECE MORE CASH OUT OF THE MUGS LET'S DO IT"!DM

If that was true we would have in our record collections a London Records CD-single titled "Temptation 1998", wouldn't we?

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗