Although the US is more artistic... I prefer the UK one in studio... However I didn't remember Bernard with so long hairs.. ![]()
(Both videos are online here if I remember right)
14 replies · 3,198 views
18 votes · voting closed
Although the US is more artistic... I prefer the UK one in studio... However I didn't remember Bernard with so long hairs.. ![]()
(Both videos are online here if I remember right)
yes, i go for the UK version too. is more simple, but the 3 of them seems to be very relaxed, which works perfect with the mood of the song.
I have a "thread-deja vu"...
But nothing changed... Still the UK-Version... Nice closeups...
UK hands down!
I still have a smash hits sticker somewhere which is a "still" from the video![]()
Shug wrote: UK hands down!
I still have a smash hits sticker somewhere which is a "still" from the video
This one, I presume:

UK version! no doubt. the other one is nice, but the other one just fits the song so much better and the emotion, and even the dry humor of it all.
but wtf is with the parrot, cockatoo about 1:11, 1:12 into it?!?
Is that a Moz reference, perhaps? Since he had/has one of those.
The_Other_Two wrote: The song has more meaning in the us version..
Yes, but I like the UK version ![]()
Meatballs586 wrote: but wtf is with the parrot, cockatoo about 1:11, 1:12 into it?
It's probably a remnant from the original video for the song which was directed by French documentary filmmaker Chris Marker, whose films often feature animals. I would imagine that Michael Shamberg probably arranged this; he had collaborated with Marker around that time.
From the book "Chris Marker: Memories of the future" by Catherine Lupton:
... Marker's sole venture into directing a pop video, for Electronic's hit "Getting away with it" (1990). The band had rejected Marker's effort (the story goes that Marker had had part of the video filmed in the Chateau de Sauvage wildlife park, and the band's singer Bernard Sumner hated animals), and so it passed into [Marker's video installation] "Zapping Zone" ...
Peter
Boing Boing Baggies Baggies wrote: All weak, anything with Neil tennant in it cannot be taken seriously - can it ?
