Skip to content

Your input is more than welcomed! -- about the new design

Archived

159 replies · 11,098 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Can you reduce the font size on the forum index pages? Maybe not make everything BOLD? Change the color of the thread subject and we'd be in business towards making a nice step forward in the look. :thumb:

0 likes

The design is awesome. Now could you just please stop locking threads when things start to get interesting?

0 likes

Great design, carry on with the rest of the site

0 likes

design looks very professional.

0 likes

looks great, main pages render a bit narrow down the middle in firefox, but not in a way that adversely affects the site.

Stop using f*in Windows Server 2003 Microsoft-IIS/6.0 I'm going to die one day and some moron stistician will work out how much of my life I spent waiting on this bloody site, retyping posts (yes, I'm getting better at remembering to clipboard my more verbose rants), and reading GIBBERISH IIS error pages, that ultimately say "arrrrggggh more than 6 people asked to to do something and I went poo poo in my pants"

I know what your gonna say tho, the whole thing's so deeply embroiled and entwined with FOOKING FP extensions and ASP and activeX and all that other bilge, that NO amount of lobotomizing will allow this site to work on apache without a total ground up recode, and no one expects you to do that, so we're boned. It's a shame really, cos you;ve done a great job on the place, it's become SO successful, that poor old "100 connections limit losedos" can't hack the pace, and there is really is jack you can do about it unless we all stump up for 10 identical servers, and a load balancer.

Of course, one advantage of IIS is that every time the winserver shites itself and reboots, if yer lucky, the site workds really well when it comes back online before everyone realizes it;s back.

0 likes

ooh! i just posted and up came the new format on there, as well!

i like how you can now see all the forums on the side of every thread.

0 likes

I also added more than 90 pictures to the random images ;)

So, the message editor is the last thing to do in the forum section, that shouldn't be too long to do!

:thumb:

0 likes

Spotnick wrote: I also added more than 90 pictures to the random images ;)

The Rasputin one is quite eerie, I must say. :eek:

0 likes

Can you use this one? I tried to find some of NO from Taras Shev, but kept pulling up the video cover (though that's good as an iconic image itself):

Stiff Kittens, 1977 :thumb:

0 likes

This is a lot better now, the left margin issue now sorted out. :thumb: :clap: :beer:

0 likes

Taboo # 7 wrote: Can you use this one? I tried to find some of NO from Taras Shev, but kept pulling up the video cover (though that's good as an iconic image itself):

Stiff Kittens, 1977 :thumb:

I added it, will be in the next release... :thumb:

0 likes

There is an obvious issue when people post too large pictures though, I'm trying to add a scrollbar!

0 likes

you can't force fit them, or script them to the right size ?( I dunno what the windows equiv of imagemagick is, but a simple script to munch all incomming files to standard size ( and damn the aspect ratio) should be easy enough whatever it is.)

It still looks narrow in my firefox, I use a high zoom by default, are other firefox users in the same boat? (wish I could remember my password, I'd use opera...but foxy has the cookie so I keep usin it)

0 likes

Great job guys! The new look is catchy and I like these NO related pictures poping up in the top of the pages. Thanks!!!

:bow2: :bow2: :bow2:

0 likes

Steve Campbell wrote: you can't force fit them, or script them to the right size ?( I dunno what the windows equiv of imagemagick is, but a simple script to munch all incomming files to standard size ( and damn the aspect ratio) should be easy enough whatever it is.)

It still looks narrow in my firefox, I use a high zoom by default, are other firefox users in the same boat? (wish I could remember my password, I'd use opera...but foxy has the cookie so I keep usin it)

I'm testing it with FireFox, and it does look great in it, so I don't see what's so narrow? :confused2:

I can't script the images from outside of here, can't predict the size if it's not hosted here... well, maybe it can, but it would be client script size mostly.

0 likes

Like I say it COULD be my zoom settings, which are disaggreeing with something you've specified. Which is why I really should try to remember my password and use opera....cos it zooms properly (note to firefox evangelists:fuck off!, no really save your lies, I've used em all, and opera,closed and evil tho it is, works best too as long as you don't ask it to render TOO much ie quality code) only browser I ever seen that can do it....and so fast too.

As for image crushin, I suppose I was hoping for a little too much for a serverside image control lib for DOS. Short of bolting The_gimp into your IIS setup, I don't see it being easy.

Anyway, FWIW, the images look fine here.

I'll take a screener of the narrowness if you like, I'm sure it's down to me pushing text size up, but the frames or tables or whatever the hell, being defined in such a way as to stop them expanding with the text.

Oh it also renders just GORGEOUSLY in Konqueror with my over-riding "ceremony-esque" CSS.

0 likes

The new design looks good, but it is not very functional. Reading the forum is quite painful because 50% of the screen is "wasted" with design elements and unnecessary information. The actual forum screen is narrowed to 50% of the screen. Reading is not that much fun anymore...

0 likes

Ruined in a day wrote: The new design looks good, but it is not very functional. Reading the forum is quite painful because 50% of the screen is "wasted" with design elements and unnecessary information. The actual forum screen is narrowed to 50% of the screen. Reading is not that much fun anymore...

I agree that at least the extreme right and left margins are totally wasted space.

0 likes

SO I'm not the only one with a sliver of forum and a lot of nice blue stuff then? Feel better now. Oddly, considering the "fluff and eye candy" factor has gone up, I'd SWEAR the site is running better.

PS, see when you;re doing the post page.....remove the "if username=stevcampbell;timeout=14.3seconds" line please :)

Even thogh you may receive a petition to the contrary.

0 likes

Not all the information is useless information. When coming up with the design, we took in consideration a few things. Most people do not visit the homepage and goes directly to the forums, So we the decision was made to integrate a few elements from the home page in the forums. Second was creating space to fit in advertisements, which is necessary to do now, because it helps the site out. Then I guess you can say some of the rest might be filler, But the space is there for use to do some other add ons in the future with out doing another redesign.

I do see your point that reading the actual thread pages might be a bit cramped. Maybe we can consider removing the left table for those pages and leave it there for the forum index pages.

We knew that doing this drastic design would please some people and might irratate some people, so this is very helpful getting everyones feedback.

0 likes

WenOrder wrote: Not all the information is useless information. When coming up with the design, we took in consideration a few things. Most people do not visit the homepage and goes directly to the forums, So we the decision was made to integrate a few elements from the home page in the forums. Second was creating space to fit in advertisements, which is necessary to do now, because it helps the site out. Then I guess you can say some of the rest might be filler, But the space is there for use to do some other add ons in the future with out doing another redesign.

I do see your point that reading the actual thread pages might be a bit cramped. Maybe we can consider removing the left table for those pages and leave it there for the forum index pages.

We knew that doing this drastic design would please some people and might irratate some people, so this is very helpful getting everyones feedback.

When you get down this far on the page, a very large fraction of the total space from left to right is blank.

0 likes

That's because you have a screen resolution higher than 1024x768 Patrick...

I too have 1280x1024, but we asked people's resolution before doing the redesign and it was quite unanimous that most people were at 1024x768, so we optimised the design for that...

It might need to scroll more, but it's not that bad... is it?

0 likes

Hey patrick, can you post or email a screen capture to us? I'd like to see what you are seeing.

Patrick wrote:

WenOrder wrote: Not all the information is useless information. When coming up with the design, we took in consideration a few things. Most people do not visit the homepage and goes directly to the forums, So we the decision was made to integrate a few elements from the home page in the forums. Second was creating space to fit in advertisements, which is necessary to do now, because it helps the site out. Then I guess you can say some of the rest might be filler, But the space is there for use to do some other add ons in the future with out doing another redesign.

I do see your point that reading the actual thread pages might be a bit cramped. Maybe we can consider removing the left table for those pages and leave it there for the forum index pages.

We knew that doing this drastic design would please some people and might irratate some people, so this is very helpful getting everyones feedback.

When you get down this far on the page, a very large fraction of the total space from left to right is blank.

0 likes

I'm afraid I have no idea what my screen resolution is, Nic. But surely the phenomenon of large blank spaces at right and left will occur at some point when you scroll down, regardless of screen resolution? It's not so bad, no, and I recognize that the portion of the screen where ads appear serves a necessary function. It's really the blank spaces at the extreme right and left that seem unnecessary.

0 likes

WenOrder wrote: Hey patrick, can you post or email a screen capture to us? I'd like to see what you are seeing.

Patrick wrote:

WenOrder wrote: Not all the information is useless information. When coming up with the design, we took in consideration a few things. Most people do not visit the homepage and goes directly to the forums, So we the decision was made to integrate a few elements from the home page in the forums. Second was creating space to fit in advertisements, which is necessary to do now, because it helps the site out. Then I guess you can say some of the rest might be filler, But the space is there for use to do some other add ons in the future with out doing another redesign.

I do see your point that reading the actual thread pages might be a bit cramped. Maybe we can consider removing the left table for those pages and leave it there for the forum index pages.

We knew that doing this drastic design would please some people and might irratate some people, so this is very helpful getting everyones feedback.

When you get down this far on the page, a very large fraction of the total space from left to right is blank.

If you could give me an idea how to do that, I'd be happy to.

0 likes

If you are on a PC, then press print screen. It'll save to your clipboard. open a graphics program. Paint on windows is fine. Paste and save.

Mac you press shift, apple, 3. a file saves to your desktop, and you can send that file.

0 likes

WenOrder wrote: Hey patrick, can you post or email a screen capture to us? I'd like to see what you are seeing.

just sent you a screenshot via e-mail, subject: "sreenshot - wasted space".

andy

0 likes

Spotnick wrote: It might need to scroll more, but it's not that bad... is it?

Actually it is seriously bad, because reading the forum becomes a pain in the eye when the actual text is narrowed to 50% of the screen, and a text line contains very little text... Not much fun anymore...

0 likes

WenOrder wrote: If you are on a PC, then press print screen. It'll save to your clipboard. open a graphics program. Paint on windows is fine. Paste and save.

Mac you press shift, apple, 3. a file saves to your desktop, and you can send that file.

A graphics program? Clearly we live in different worlds.

0 likes

WenOrder wrote: If you are on a PC, then press print screen. It'll save to your clipboard. open a graphics program. Paint on windows is fine. Paste and save.

Mac you press shift, apple, 3. a file saves to your desktop, and you can send that file.

If you can open Word files on your mac, it's easier to ask them to paste into Word ;)

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗