27 replies · 2,122 views
18 votes · voting closed
Let's face it: everybody hates Osama and everybody (sensible) hates Paul McCartney (excuse me, "Sir" Paul McCartney. So the ideal situation is, both are being held for crimes against humanity, but you only have one bullet in your gun. The question is simple: who do you shoot? 
And there's no "other" option either (it's my poll, I can set it up however I please) 
Osama. I can always turn off the radio, and I don't have to buy McCartney's CDs, but I can't avoid that religious wingnut's presence every time I get on a plane.
Why does everyone hate Osama ?
He was ok when the British and American were funding him to fight the Russians.
He is just a scapegoat. It the American govenment I hate and there plans for world domination.
Mike
I'd use my bullet on Charles Clarke (our Education Secretary, for the benefit of those NOOL'ers outside the UK). This twat thinks that 50% of all young people here should go to university and, by getting our schools, teachers etc. to try and "persuade" us to go, has ruined my life and the lives of God knows how many other people my age.
Originally posted by One Brain > Originally posted by Taboo # 7> And there's no "other" option either
Yes, there is.
Yeah, I notice that before it was too late...oh well, insert your choice there then, I suppose 
Originally posted by Mike I want two bullets,the other is for Justin Timerwank
Death would be too good for him if it was that quick, mate! I propose tying him to a chair in a dark room and forcing him to listen to nothing but his own music for 48 hours; of course, he'd get no food and only water to drink during that time. Then he should have one leg tied to the exhaust of Britney's car and she should go belting round the streets for a few hours, dragging him along behind her, until he's been scrubbed out. Revenge is sweet! 
Plenty of Yanks gunning for the bin laden. Killing Paul would forever end any possibility of a Beatles reunion.
twist<-------wants steak
Originally posted by twist Killing Paul would forever end any possibility of a Beatles reunion.
Wouldn't the fact that two of them are dead kinda rule out the possibility of a reunion? Or am I being too damned literal-minded again?
Twist
Just thought I would let you know, John Lennon and George Harrison are already dead, so there cannot be a Beatles reunion whether Macca is dead or alive.
Mike
Originally posted by Mike TwistJust thought I would let you know, John Lennon and George Harrison are already dead, so there cannot be a Beatles reunion whether Macca is dead or alive.Mike
If he is dead then it will prevent him from overcharging mindless fans to his shite concerts
Ringo is still alive. They could get Julian and a stand in for George. Lynard Skynard still tours despite the plane wreck.
Julian looks like his father, but sadly, could not hold a candle to him musically. The Beatles were the Lennon/McCartney team. That's John Lennon. Bringing in another Lennon just isn't the same. John Lennon and Paul McCartney are the reason musicians write and perform their own music today, for better or for worse. Well, them and Dylan. There is no substitute for John Lennon in the Beatles. Not even Julian.
But, I'm sure if they had done it while Harrison was alive, they would have made a fortune. However, there's nobody around who plays like George. That signature slide guitar of his is one-of-a-kind.
Really, McCartney has written some sappy, syrupy music in his time, but his fans love it, and it's their prerogative to be clueless. A McCartney performance is the closest this world will ever come again to a Beatles performance.
Despite the sappy music, McCartney's a decent guy, who's supported some worthy causes, and THIS POLL IS JUST PLAIN FUCKING SILLY. Osama bin Laden, regardless of where he's found his support in the past, is a religious fascist who has not only made life miserable for all of us when we travel, but he has single-handedly helped the fascists in American government weaken many of our constitutional liberties. McCartney writes sugary, throwaway pop songs? BFD. My bullet's going straight between the fascist's eyes.
Originally posted by bLuE oRdEr THIS POLL IS JUST PLAIN FUCKING SILLY.
In other words, a typical Taboo poll :D
Yeah, my hatred for Sir Paul should not outweigh the importance of nabbing Bin Laden and giving him a nice case of twenty bullets to his brain, but I was feeling particularly nasty that day (I hadn't showered yet ), so thus this poll.
Originally posted by Taboo # 7 > Originally posted by bLuE oRdEr> THIS POLL IS JUST PLAIN FUCKING SILLY.
In other words, a typical Taboo poll :D
Yeah, my hatred for Sir Paul should not outweigh the importance of nabbing Bin Laden and giving him a nice case of twenty bullets to his brain, but I was feeling particularly nasty that day (I hadn't showered yet ), so thus this poll.
Quite. ;)
Same here today. :D
Todays traffic warden , M/cr, I know he's only doin a job,and I only think he's a tit , so maybe just asmaal calibre round to his foot
Originally posted by Digital Mike I want two bullets,the other is for Justin Timerwank
shut up. he's hot.
One bullet,but if you use a .44 Magnum & put them head to head,you could kill them both. So Dirty Harry says anyhow!
If I shot Bin Laden would it stop the atrocities?
If I shot Sir Mac would it stop the atrocities?
Originally posted by Dee If I shot Bin Laden would it stop the atrocities? If I shot Sir Mac would it stop the atrocities?
when you look at it that way,shoot McCartney-he`s been doing it for nearly 50 years.
paul ,probably, hasnt a clue how much suffering he's caused throughout the world.
osama "fuck yo momma" does have an indication.
:
one bullet for my old boss
