Uncle Liam wrote:
How anyone thinks Defoe is a player of international standard is beyond me. His performance last night was as bad as anything Heskey ever did for England. Yet here was the player who wouldve won us the World Cup if he's gone, according to some.
Last nights performance was pathetic. Yes we won, but on the same night the Germans beat San Marino 13-0 away from home, we struggle and hold on for a 1-0 win against the only team Andorra have ever beaten.
Bollocks!
I think some people agreed that Defoe would have been a better choice than Walcott as a striker! There was no talk, at all, of Defoe being the key person that would "win" England the World Cup. He would have been my fave out of a piss poor selection.
2 seasons ago, Defoe was a brilliant striker, scoring on the regs for Tottenham Hotspur. He lost his place last year for various reasons and this contributed to a lack of form when he did get to play for Spurs. Shame really, because he was a good player, and I don't think you can slate his form for England when he has not really had a fair crack of the whip!
I'm not saying he should have a place, but I think if you want to slate players for Englands continuous poor form, someone like Lampard, who makes it into the team, regardless of being totally shit for some time now, warrants a thread of his own.
Englands problem will always be, they will never have a manager that has the balls to drop the big names, despite poor form. That's where the problems lie, but it's easy to shove the blame on players that do not have a regular place!