I just got my tickets for Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith tonight for the 5/18 12:01am showing.
CAN'T WAIT!
Who else is going/has tickets?
Dates
· UTC
Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith
Archived51 replies · 2,190 views
This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.
I'm looking forward to it, but I've tempered any excitement about it by recalling how disappointing "Kangaroo Jack" was :p
You'd think a movie with Jerry O'Connell AND a talking kangaroo would be above and beyond, but it wasn't 
Rian wrote: I'll just wait for the DVD
You will not wait for the DVD ("I will not wait for the DVD")
You will camp out in front of the theater ("I will camp out in front of the theater")
You will send Trevor all your monetary worth ("But all I have is fifty cents")
Trevor will not mind ("He could use the cash")
Taboo # 7 wrote:
Rian wrote: I'll just wait for the DVD
You will not wait for the DVD ("I will not wait for the DVD")
You will camp out in front of the theater ("I will camp out in front of the theater")
You will send Trevor all your monetary worth ("But all I have is fifty cents")
Trevor will not mind ("He could use the cash")
NAh. To old for that camping stuff. :D
As usual, once the non-sense is over, there will be plenty of time to go see it.
But I must say, Star Wars doesn't do it for me, maybe when I was a kid, but now? Plus... we all know what will be happening, don't we?
Taboo # 7 wrote:
Rian wrote: I'll just wait for the DVD
You will not wait for the DVD ("I will not wait for the DVD")
You will camp out in front of the theater ("I will camp out in front of the theater")
You will send Trevor all your monetary worth ("But all I have is fifty cents")
Trevor will not mind ("He could use the cash")
Shut up big head!
[darkgreen]Green[/darkgreen] wrote: Err, I'll probably skip this one, just like I've done for the last two..............sorry.
Same.
Taboo # 7 wrote: I'm looking forward to it, but I've tempered any excitement about it by recalling how disappointing "Kangaroo Jack" was :p
You'd think a movie with Jerry O'Connell AND a talking kangaroo would be above and beyond, but it wasn't
"He took your money...and he isn't giving it back."
i think this will be the best one of the new three(like thats not a no brainer) but i really am holding out hope that it will be a great movie, i read that when steven Speilberg saw it at a recent screening he openly wept at the end!?!
i know we all know whats going to happen, but maybe we will get a suprise or two, then again maybe not
may the force be with you
Ben wrote: If only Natalie Portman would go frontal in it...
If she won't do it in a film playing a stripper, then there's more than likely not a snowball's chance in hell of that ever happening.
[darkgreen]Green[/darkgreen] wrote:
Ben wrote: If only Natalie Portman would go frontal in it...
If she won't do it in a film playing a stripper, then there's more than likely not a snowball's chance in hell of that ever happening.
She did in my dream last night.....oh, I guess that don't count 
[darkgreen]Green[/darkgreen] wrote:
Ben wrote: If only Natalie Portman would go frontal in it...
If she won't do it in a film playing a stripper, then there's more than likely not a snowball's chance in hell of that ever happening.
But she DID! And we can all blame Mike Nichols for cutting the full frontal scenes she filmed.
His Holiness, The Pope wrote:
[darkgreen]Green[/darkgreen] wrote:
Ben wrote: If only Natalie Portman would go frontal in it...
If she won't do it in a film playing a stripper, then there's more than likely not a snowball's chance in hell of that ever happening.
But she DID! And we can all blame Mike Nichols for cutting the full frontal scenes she filmed.
It might appear on a director's cut special version DVD, then 
His Holiness, The Pope wrote:
[darkgreen]Green[/darkgreen] wrote:
Ben wrote: If only Natalie Portman would go frontal in it...
If she won't do it in a film playing a stripper, then there's more than likely not a snowball's chance in hell of that ever happening.
But she DID! And we can all blame Mike Nichols for cutting the full frontal scenes she filmed.
I think she deserves some of the credit for those scenes ending up on the cutting room floor as well.
[darkgreen]Green[/darkgreen] wrote:
His Holiness, The Pope wrote:
[darkgreen]Green[/darkgreen] wrote:
Ben wrote: If only Natalie Portman would go frontal in it...
If she won't do it in a film playing a stripper, then there's more than likely not a snowball's chance in hell of that ever happening.
But she DID! And we can all blame Mike Nichols for cutting the full frontal scenes she filmed.
I think she deserves some of the credit for those scenes ending up on the cutting room floor as well.
What would be her point in playing these scenes and then wanting to have them cut? Methinks it's a commercial trick. You'll have them on a special DVD edition (to be released 2 months after the standard one).
Ben wrote:
[darkgreen]Green[/darkgreen] wrote:
His Holiness, The Pope wrote:
[darkgreen]Green[/darkgreen] wrote:
Ben wrote: If only Natalie Portman would go frontal in it...
If she won't do it in a film playing a stripper, then there's more than likely not a snowball's chance in hell of that ever happening.
But she DID! And we can all blame Mike Nichols for cutting the full frontal scenes she filmed.
I think she deserves some of the credit for those scenes ending up on the cutting room floor as well.
What would be her point in playing these scenes and then wanting to have them cut? Methinks it's a commercial trick. You'll have them on a special DVD edition (to be released 2 months after the standard one).
And then the world will realize how perfect her lithe little body is 
offtopic, Natalie was great in "Garden State" last year. Apart from the juggernaut "Wars" features, she's generally great (she's underused in those) 
oh im going oh yes im going,if only to wind my missus up.
i bought one of them lightsabers off firebox.com and fuck its ace,everyone whos seen it wants one.
i keep telling her that as soon as the credits start up at the begining its woosh time with the saber in the fliks,stood on my seat waving it around my head.
and when an usher rushes over to tell me to sit down ill tell him im his father ect.
and now shes threatening not to go,wonder why
The first one was piss, the second was on par with the original trilogy, and with the violence and tragedy upped (a PG-13?!), it seems that the acting and story rise above the mega-SFX. Only time will tell. I'll see it the opening week, NOT the opening day, and I will NOT camp in front of the theatre the week before (saw some goons setting up a camp at the edge of the local Regal...I wish I could release the hounds )
The Hannettarium wrote: ***SPOILER WARNING***
Anakin is Darth Vader.
YOU SON OF A BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
Now you've ruined it for me...thanks! 
I suppose you're gonna say that Darth is Luke's dad too, huh? Not that I would believe that
Or that Yoda dies...?! Let me guess, he disappears like Obi-Wan and joins the Ewoks in a celebratory Robot dance at the end of Return of the Jedi?!
Bastard.
at least there are wookies in this one and not ewoks, thats gotta make it better right there.
well only a few more days, i dont know if im feeling excitement
or impending doom
