client.
Archived86 replies · 1,243 views
Uncle Liam wrote: you so would!
Sort other pics out though Dave!
I second this motion...Shades of Wendy James!
Hang on a minute - I recognise that blonde bird - she's that singer who used to be in Dubstar (a sort of Smithsy, Pet Shop Boysy, Kirsty MacColl-ish combination) isnt she? Am I right?
Our Lorraine has that first album of theirs "Disgraceful" - with that naughy cover of a pencil case opened like a vagina - and it's pretty good isnt it?
So Client is her new band then? Wondered what had happend to her when Dubstar called it a day.
By 'Eck! My Neck! wrote: Hang on a minute - I recognise that blonde bird - she's that singer who used to be in Dubstar (a sort of Smithsy, Pet Shop Boysy, Kirsty MacColl-ish combination) isnt she? Am I right?
Our Lorraine has that first album of theirs "Disgraceful" - with that naughy cover of a pencil case opened like a vagina - and it's pretty good isnt it?
Yer right, that is the lovely Sarah Blackwood of Dubstar fame 
I've got Disgraceful, Goodbye and The Best Of Dubstar and they're all pretty good albums. I guess they decided to disband once they'd musically run their course which was very wise; their sound did have a bit of a shelf life. Not So Manic Now, Stars and Elevator Song are still classic synthpop singles though.
Strangely, she's gotten better looking as she's gotten older! 
Maybe it's the short, tight leather dresses in a sweaty gig environment that's changing my mind :D oooooh yes.
The other bird's not bad either, ex-Creation boss Alan McGee's wife innit? She had a very New Order-ey sounding band called Technique before Client didn't she? Probably not a coincidence with the name there...
I can see two good reasons why loads of you's are into these.
Havnae listened to their stuff, but if it's anywhere near as good as they look....
Got a couple of their singles... Not bad, but the 'live' experience definitely looks better...
SHEDi xxx
Al Jarvis wrote: Looks rough over brekky, mind.
Get her talking about the Sopranos though. She loves it.
fag in hand, greasy blond hair, smeared make-up. tell me about it. couldn't wait to get rid.
(better than L7 though)
Am I the only person that doesn't get the attraction? Stick any burd in that rig out and she's gonna turn heads but her face is nothin special. She wouldn't pass the "just outta bed wearin joggy bottoms and an oversized t-shirt" test! Wouldnae mind a better swatch at the dark haired one though.
Yes I must confess they look like big butch girls in nice dresses. Take away the sexy outfits and you're not left with much. Which raises the question, are they any good or do they need to dress like this to get anyone to pay attention. cos so far I have heard more discussion of their doability than their compositional strengths, relative instrumental abilities and musical vision....then again this is NOOL, I'll be waiting a while for that kind of thing.
GlasVegas wrote: Am I the only person that doesn't get the attraction? Stick any burd in that rig out and she's gonna turn heads but her face is nothin special. She wouldn't pass the "just outta bed wearin joggy bottoms and an oversized t-shirt" test! Wouldnae mind a better swatch at the dark haired one though.
I agree..
plus she's too heavy for that dress..
side view would make you think she's 6 months on :P
GlasVegas wrote: Am I the only person that doesn't get the attraction? Stick any burd in that rig out and she's gonna turn heads but her face is nothin special. She wouldn't pass the "just outta bed wearin joggy bottoms and an oversized t-shirt" test! Wouldnae mind a better swatch at the dark haired one though.
You'd bum her tho
Doctor? wrote: Yes I must confess they look like big butch girls in nice dresses. Take away the sexy outfits and you're not left with much. Which raises the question, are they any good or do they need to dress like this to get anyone to pay attention. cos so far I have heard more discussion of their doability than their compositional strengths, relative instrumental abilities and musical vision....then again this is NOOL, I'll be waiting a while for that kind of thing.
Fussy git!
ChrissMari wrote:
GlasVegas wrote: Am I the only person that doesn't get the attraction? Stick any burd in that rig out and she's gonna turn heads but her face is nothin special. She wouldn't pass the "just outta bed wearin joggy bottoms and an oversized t-shirt" test! Wouldnae mind a better swatch at the dark haired one though.
I agree..
plus she's too heavy for that dress..
side view would make you think she's 6 months on :P
What's wrong with fat birds?
Boatraceface wrote:
ChrissMari wrote:
GlasVegas wrote: Am I the only person that doesn't get the attraction? Stick any burd in that rig out and she's gonna turn heads but her face is nothin special. She wouldn't pass the "just outta bed wearin joggy bottoms and an oversized t-shirt" test! Wouldnae mind a better swatch at the dark haired one though.
I agree..
plus she's too heavy for that dress..
side view would make you think she's 6 months on :P
What's wrong with fat birds?
nowt as long as we don't wear dresses like that ;)'
"Big Girls: Just cause they make it in your size don't MEAN you gotta WEAR it!!"
I must concede pummeling after six months pregnant is awful.
Some men find pregnant women attractive,said a usually stunning Mrs BRF when she was 8 months..I had to pretend
Indeed, Client A does look like she's got a bit of a pot in one side profile.
But really, BIG BIRDS?!
That pair only top 5ft6 when they're in huge heels and there ain't an ounce of spare on them. The giraffe they've got at the back (not many close-ups of her) has as much fat on her as one of my coat-hangers. She's good 5ft10, but the correct weight for a 4ft school-girl. A 4ft school-girl with an eating disorder.
Al Jarvis wrote: Indeed, Client A does look like she's got a bit of a pot in one side profile.
But really, BIG BIRDS?!
That pair only top 5ft6 when they're in huge heels and there ain't an ounce of spare on them. The giraffe they've got at the back (not many close-ups of her) has as much fat on her as one of my coat-hangers. She's good 5ft10, but the correct weight for a 4ft school-girl. A 4ft school-girl with an eating disorder.
Another fussy git!
If she passes the 3 step criteria she'll do for me
Can she cook,fuck,and do the washing up?
Al Jarvis wrote: Indeed, Client A does look like she's got a bit of a pot in one side profile.
But really, BIG BIRDS?!
That pair only top 5ft6 when they're in huge heels and there ain't an ounce of spare on them. The giraffe they've got at the back (not many close-ups of her) has as much fat on her as one of my coat-hangers. She's good 5ft10, but the correct weight for a 4ft school-girl. A 4ft school-girl with an eating disorder.
Al, are you familliar with Python? You ever seen the sketch with the hisory professors who have a rather intersting way of working out who's most important?
Even if you don't get it, someone will read this and keel over in stiches I assure you :D
Boatraceface wrote: Am I the only one sat stoney faced and not at all keeling over in stitches
Me too. I'm googling, but can't find said sketch.
Guess you had to be there. 
J.A.K wrote: rememeber it well. it was RUBBISH!!
It was...but you gotta admit Al's post reads like it.
It is a really obscure sketch too, from one of the not desperately funny episodes. Ahhhh python, the NO of comedy :D
