Skip to content

"YO, BLAIR!"

Archived

45 replies · 536 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Is apparently how Dubya refers to our Prime Minister. :laugh:

Class.

0 likes

A link, Jack?

0 likes

Have you not heard about it?

The PM and Dubya were having a "private" conversation over lunch at some summit and they left a microphone on. :lol:

0 likes

Is there anything left to be said about W that hasn't already been said? :lol:

0 likes

Bush is so embarrassing. No words for him really. He sounded so rude talking to Tony Blair. He kept interrupting him...I can't wait for 2008...

0 likes

friggin BBC don't they know it's: "Yo, Blair!"?

fucking philistines and their poor grasp on the english language

0 likes

ChrissMari wrote: friggin BBC don't they know it's: "Yo, Blair!"?

fucking philistines and their poor grasp on the english language

:brow:

0 likes

ILoveBarney wrote: Bush is so embarrassing. No words for him really. He sounded so rude talking to Tony Blair. He kept interrupting him...I can't wait for 2008...

Hopefully the American public has a long enough memory and attention span to remember this come 2008.

0 likes

I heard this and I've been combing the Internet for various articles and whatnot, and I think it's a disgrace for Mr Bush to refer to Mr Blair as "Yo, Blair!". :nonono: How chav-like and uncouth...

0 likes

I still can't believe we elected him TWICE but ah well, what can you do? :shrug:

0 likes

Listened to it twice, but can't hear the "Yo, Blair" bit. (Notice the comma - correct English :nod: )

The conversation is a bit frightening, who votes for this guy??

0 likes

Ness Order wrote:

The conversation is a bit frightening, who votes for this guy??

:nod:

0 likes

Comrade Shampanyov, Gentleman wrote: Is there anything left to be said about W that hasn't already been said? :lol:

Yes, he eats with his mouth open. Uncouth.
:nono:

0 likes

James Thomas wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov, Gentleman wrote: Is there anything left to be said about W that hasn't already been said? :lol:

Yes, he eats with his mouth open. Uncouth.
:nono:

while speaking even!

0 likes

Shellshocker wrote:

ILoveBarney wrote: Bush is so embarrassing. No words for him really. He sounded so rude talking to Tony Blair. He kept interrupting him...I can't wait for 2008...

Hopefully the American public has a long enough memory and attention span to remember this come 2008.

I hope so too. Any thing (doesn't even have to be a human at this point!) could run a country better than this.

0 likes

James Thomas wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov, Gentleman wrote: Is there anything left to be said about W that hasn't already been said? :lol:

Yes, he eats with his mouth open. Uncouth.
:nono:

He also shoves food into his mouth whilst talking to a fellow world leader...:nonono:

0 likes

This seems "pythonesque"... He behaves like a chief of barbarians, a leader of a tribe far from civilisation... even cupid kings or emperors seemed more upbrought in our imagination... well, in mine at least. It could have been a piece of fun with Michael Palin in the role, but W...

And British foreign policy aside, I feel very embarrassed for Mr. Blair...

0 likes

I know this is a thread to basically rant, but it seems like a conversation between two people. They know each other quite well, so I don't see what all the "ta-do" about it. So they talk like normal people. . .what's the big deal?

JHC

0 likes

"The meeting of Blackadder and Père Ubu"

0 likes

68Pontiac wrote: I know this is a thread to basically rant, but it seems like a conversation between two people. They know each other quite well, so I don't see what all the "ta-do" about it. So they talk like normal people. . .what's the big deal?

JHC

You are right in a way. But it does not fit the protocol of such a meeting.

0 likes

68Pontiac wrote: I know this is a thread to basically rant, but it seems like a conversation between two people. They know each other quite well, so I don't see what all the "ta-do" about it. So they talk like normal people. . .what's the big deal?

JHC

It's not the fact that Mr Bush used profanity that's the point. I'm frankly frightened that somebody like you thinks this way. It's how he's over-simplifying politics by casually remarking how they need to just "stop it" and it's over, that's scary, not the fact the he used profanity. Well, if that's the case, then I suppose wars and other crisises wouldn't occur, because you could just tap the guy on the shoulder, or ring him up on the phone telling them to "stop it". On another note, apparently, the US government is willing to evacuate fellow US citizens out of Lebanon, only if the evacuees will reimburse the fees for doing so. Other countries have evacuated their citizens out of Lebanon without charging them... :angry: Shame...shame...shame... Even if you're not American, this still is an outrageous thing to think of. If the government's got the money to spend on the "war", as well as pork-barrel projects (whatever you call those things), then they should be able to evacuate their own citizens without charging them!

0 likes

I think there was a lot of discussion in the past about whether this "village idiot" way of behaving is an act or not. Well, based on this event...I'm starting to think it's a genuine malady :uhoh:

We are all going to fucking die if this jackass stays in office one day longer :faint:

0 likes

what not even yo Ton. :lol:

0 likes

well, i hate bush as much as the next guy, but if clinton did something like this it would be laughed at and forgiven.

0 likes

Dunno why you septics still call him "Bush". Surely "pink thing underneath the bush" would be more appropriate?

0 likes

oldmonkey wrote: Dunno why you septics still call him "Bush". Surely "pink thing underneath the bush" would be more appropriate?

not big or clever :P

:evil4:

0 likes

jonathan wrote: well, i hate bush as much as the next guy, but if clinton did something like this it would be laughed at and forgiven.

by democrats republicans would try to make a big deal out of it

that's all that's happening here.

0 likes

leather_girl wrote: On another note, apparently, the US government is willing to evacuate fellow US citizens out of Lebanon, only if the evacuees will reimburse the fees for doing so. Other countries have evacuated their citizens out of Lebanon without charging them... :angry: Shame...shame...shame... Even if you're not American, this still is an outrageous thing to think of. If the government's got the money to spend on the "war", as well as pork-barrel projects (whatever you call those things), then they should be able to evacuate their own citizens without charging them!

Last night, the US govt decided to waive the fee. So, the Americans get evacuated for free. Yay Condy! :thumb:
However, Holland, France, and Switzerland evacuated their people days ago. :brow:

0 likes

Shellshocker wrote:

leather_girl wrote: On another note, apparently, the US government is willing to evacuate fellow US citizens out of Lebanon, only if the evacuees will reimburse the fees for doing so. Other countries have evacuated their citizens out of Lebanon without charging them... :angry: Shame...shame...shame... Even if you're not American, this still is an outrageous thing to think of. If the government's got the money to spend on the "war", as well as pork-barrel projects (whatever you call those things), then they should be able to evacuate their own citizens without charging them!

Last night, the US govt decided to waive the fee. So, the Americans get evacuated for free. Yay Condy! :thumb:
However, Holland, France, and Switzerland evacuated their people days ago. :brow:

because if the US did it would be acknowledging that Israel is doign something to cause harm to the rest of the world and that's just not done!

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗