john - did you know that the underboob (technical term!) is considered a no go these days & has been banned from advertising?
there was an article about it in the observer on sunday 
ridiculous eh?
Dates
· UTC
john sluddens avatar
Archived100 replies · 2,517 views
This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.
hibster wrote: no, no, keep it as a campaign for, err, somehting or other, i'll get back to you on that!
I agree. She might want to change her top, mind.
The bigger image does nothing for her face...
Are we starting a thread for beautiful women yet?
leather_girl wrote: I'm not a prudish person, but I don't think such avatars should be allowed on here....
Feeling a bit threatened are we? Never undertood the whole "offended" thing when it comes to women fully clothed.
JHC
leather_girl wrote: I'm not a prudish person, but I don't think such avatars should be allowed on here....
WHY???
Her chest looks fake...she looks like a classless tart, and she is chubby and not thin. Plus, she looks like she has a low IQ. If she pulled down her top and wore something instead of just underwear, it would be a better picture, but I don't think such pictures should be allowed for usage as individual's avatars... As I've said, I'm not exactly prudish on such matters, but what message are these straight men sending to women? That you have to look stupid and be half naked to be attractive? No wonder I loathe some straight men...at least half of them think that airhead bimbos are what women should look like.
for fucks sake, it's a picture...and now you can tell by LOOKING at someone as to how intelligent they are???
Jesus, you are starting to sound like an idiot...
I'm not implying that she is stupid per se, but I just don't think it's right for such pictures to be used as avatars on this site...it's a bit too racy. Plus, she needs to wear some clothing. Why do men ogle women who are half-naked? I don't ogle men who are half-naked.
There are simply too many men who think that women need to be half-naked to be attractive, and I loathe such men who think that way.
leather_girl wrote: I'm not implying that she is stupid per se, but I just don't think it's right for such pictures to be used as avatars on this site...it's a bit too racy. Plus, she needs to wear some clothing. Why do men ogle women who are half-naked? I don't ogle men who are half-naked.
There are simply too many men who think that women need to be half-naked to be attractive, and I loathe such men who think that way.
So you loathe all men! Give me a guy who says he would prefer a picture of a woman fully clothed showing no skin, than a picture showing a little and that guy is a LIAR! Sure we say those things, but it's not what we are really thinking.
JHC
68Pontiac wrote:
leather_girl wrote: I'm not implying that she is stupid per se, but I just don't think it's right for such pictures to be used as avatars on this site...it's a bit too racy. Plus, she needs to wear some clothing. Why do men ogle women who are half-naked? I don't ogle men who are half-naked.
There are simply too many men who think that women need to be half-naked to be attractive, and I loathe such men who think that way.
So you loathe all men! Give me a guy who says he would prefer a picture of a woman fully clothed showing no skin, than a picture showing a little and that guy is a LIAR! Sure we say those things, but it's not what we are really thinking.
JHC
As I've mentioned in a different thread, I loathe all sexist men. I like men who are not sexist. You don't hear about women thinking with their private parts when they look at men. But there are a lot of sexist men who think with their you-know-whats instead of their brains. I'm not saying it's wrong to wear revealing clothing, but it's just that I get the feeling that men who happen to be sexist only think a woman is attractive when a woman is half-naked. There's no denying that people find nudity to some extent attractive, but as I've said, sexist men think being half-naked is the only way for a woman to be attractive.
leather_girl wrote:
68Pontiac wrote:
leather_girl wrote: I'm not implying that she is stupid per se, but I just don't think it's right for such pictures to be used as avatars on this site...it's a bit too racy. Plus, she needs to wear some clothing. Why do men ogle women who are half-naked? I don't ogle men who are half-naked.
There are simply too many men who think that women need to be half-naked to be attractive, and I loathe such men who think that way.
So you loathe all men! Give me a guy who says he would prefer a picture of a woman fully clothed showing no skin, than a picture showing a little and that guy is a LIAR! Sure we say those things, but it's not what we are really thinking.
JHC
As I've mentioned in a different thread, I loathe all sexist men. I like men who are not sexist. You don't hear about women thinking with their private parts when they look at men. But there are a lot of sexist men who think with their you-know-whats instead of their brains. I'm not saying it's wrong to wear revealing clothing, but it's just that I get the feeling that men who happen to be sexist only think a woman is attractive when a woman is half-naked. There's no denying that people find nudity to some extent attractive, but as I've said, sexist men think being half-naked is the only way for a woman to be attractive.
honestly i find it very peculiar that all this stuff is coming from sombody who posts with a link to some of the sickest stuff i have read in a while. bit of a double standard here.
Sure, my website's in my profile, but, I've never encouraged anybody to go see it, neither have I personally posted anything from that site for people to see here.
NOOLigan wrote:
leather_girl wrote:
As I've mentioned in a different thread, I loathe all sexist men. I like men who are not sexist. You don't hear about women thinking with their private parts when they look at men. But there are a lot of sexist men who think with their you-know-whats instead of their brains. I'm not saying it's wrong to wear revealing clothing, but it's just that I get the feeling that men who happen to be sexist only think a woman is attractive when a woman is half-naked. There's no denying that people find nudity to some extent attractive, but as I've said, sexist men think being half-naked is the only way for a woman to be attractive.
honestly i find it very peculiar that all this stuff is coming from sombody who posts with a link to some of the sickest stuff i have read in a while. bit of a double standard here.
Also to note, LG you have come out and stated I am one of these sexists people, that thinks only with my meat and not with my brains. Also that I require women to be half naked to be attractive?
Kind of a broad assumption on your part. Could not your statements be seen as sexist?
JHC
leather_girl wrote:
68Pontiac wrote:
leather_girl wrote: I'm not implying that she is stupid per se, but I just don't think it's right for such pictures to be used as avatars on this site...it's a bit too racy. Plus, she needs to wear some clothing. Why do men ogle women who are half-naked? I don't ogle men who are half-naked.
There are simply too many men who think that women need to be half-naked to be attractive, and I loathe such men who think that way.
So you loathe all men! Give me a guy who says he would prefer a picture of a woman fully clothed showing no skin, than a picture showing a little and that guy is a LIAR! Sure we say those things, but it's not what we are really thinking.
JHC
As I've mentioned in a different thread, I loathe all sexist men. I like men who are not sexist. You don't hear about women thinking with their private parts when they look at men. But there are a lot of sexist men who think with their you-know-whats instead of their brains. I'm not saying it's wrong to wear revealing clothing, but it's just that I get the feeling that men who happen to be sexist only think a woman is attractive when a woman is half-naked. There's no denying that people find nudity to some extent attractive, but as I've said, sexist men think being half-naked is the only way for a woman to be attractive.
A bit strong Eimi! If you're implying that if you like a scantily clad picture of a woman,that you have no respect for women,you're way off the mark.
To deny that males are attracted to a bit of flesh,they'd have to be completely prudish,whether they're gay OR straight.
It's just a bit of fun,and seeing as New Order have always had a lad-rock air about them,highly likely you'll find a bit here.
Personally,my girlfriend chooses what she wants to wear,but I won't force the Victorian smock on her at this point in time.
leather_girl wrote: I'm not a prudish person, but I don't think such avatars should be allowed on here....
i agree, any pictures of celtic tops should definitely not be allowed :)
those are some classy black underpants shes got there wal-mart special? 3 for the price of one pack of briefs.
the best bit is that inner bone thingio in the groinal region. tis boss that!
ooops sorry Leather kid.
:p
leather_girl wrote: Her chest looks fake...she looks like a classless tart, and she is chubby and not thin. Plus, she looks like she has a low IQ. If she pulled down her top and wore something instead of just underwear, it would be a better picture, but I don't think such pictures should be allowed for usage as individual's avatars... As I've said, I'm not exactly prudish on such matters, but what message are these straight men sending to women? That you have to look stupid and be half naked to be attractive? No wonder I loathe some straight men...at least half of them think that airhead bimbos are what women should look like.
Sorry, had enough of your crap. If you don't like it, ignore it. What is this "she looks chubby and not thin" (oh my god send in the body police) This is a website for New Order fans, not for narrow minded individuals to spout their politically correct crap and slag of men for fancying a good looking woman. It's just a laugh.
My god! Now I understand - one rule for one. 
PS How the hell can you tell if someone has a low IQ with a pic like that - madness!!
