But your no dragging me into a political discussion, 'cause I don't come on here to talk politics. ![]()
(I come on to relax an' hopefully have a laugh).
Edit: this was meant to be under my previous post but Doc "Quick-Draw" Campbell beat me too it.
51 replies · 1,419 views
But your no dragging me into a political discussion, 'cause I don't come on here to talk politics. ![]()
(I come on to relax an' hopefully have a laugh).
Edit: this was meant to be under my previous post but Doc "Quick-Draw" Campbell beat me too it.
Doctor? wrote: wont work.
Too many stupid greedy monkeys.
In a society that lauds greed and selfishness, what a surprise
.
All human nature isn't fixed and immutable, and is greatly influenced by environment. Homo-sapiens as a species are inherently social and co-operative.
Hmmmm..
I only popped out for a few hours and all hells broken loose on this one
Anyway, back to the subject, looks like theres a good chance he will be fit to race this weekend. Fucking amazing!
MIMX, how many people REALLY have what it takes to stop these problems? Its not a water issue that is the issue, but warlords and bullies with weapons that are forcing villages into issues like this.
Want to fix the issue? Then the warlords and bullies need to be taken out and replaced......but Iraq is a prime case to show how that isn't as easy as it sounds....
So instead of complaining about F1, how about DOING something about the water issue then, instead of waiting for others to take care of the issue......
EdelBrock wrote: MIMX, how many people REALLY have what it takes to stop these problems? Its not a water issue that is the issue, but warlords and bullies with weapons that are forcing villages into issues like this. Want to fix the issue? Then the warlords and bullies need to be taken out and replaced......but Iraq is a prime case to show how that isn't as easy as it sounds.... So instead of complaining about F1, how about DOING something about the water issue then, instead of waiting for others to take care of the issue......
Q. How many people REALLY have what it takes to stop these problems? A. Everyone.
S(tatement). Its not a water issue that is the issue, but warlords and bullies with weapons that are forcing villages into issues like this. R(eply). It's, as I'm sure, the majority would concede, a problem (just 1 of the many) caused by capitalism.
R(hetorical) Q. Want to fix the issue? Then the warlords and bullies need to be taken out and replaced A.A(nyway). Couldn't agree more, lets start with the biggest bullies of the lot, you guessed it, the Govt of the US of A, and their arse-licking British Govt cronies.
S. how about DOING something about the water issue then, instead of waiting for others to take care of the issue. R. I'm amazed that you seem to know what I do or don't do without ever having met me!
Agitate Educate Organise T.I.C
But as I said, I don't want to get dragged into political discussions, as it's generally about as much use as
, especially on on-line forums.
My disgust at so many children/people dying for the mere want of clean water is at least as much to do with morality as it is politics.
(With apologies to Old Blue didn't mean to subvert your thread, I ain't no Trotskyist, just came on to see who Robert Kubica is, or very nearly was by the looks of it ).
Monkey greedy. Monkey not clever. Monkey has overbred.
Solve ANY one of those and you have a chance of your little marxist utopia. Until then, witness the results every time this philosophy has been tried out.
For every person with a clue there are 10,000 who wouldn't let go of the fig in the jar[1] if a lion was approaching rapidly.
[1] the archetypical and cannonical greedy monkey trap.....fig or simillar fruit in a jar with a narrow neck tethered to a big rock. Monkey puts hand in, grabs fruit, and then can't get it's hand out cos it's in a fist. The greedy monkey will be found dead or near dead when the trapper returns, too greedy to release.
Doctor? wrote: Monkey greedy. Monkey not clever. Monkey has overbred.
Solve ANY one of those and you have a chance of your little marxist utopia. Until then, witness the results every time this philosophy has been tried out.
For every person with a clue there are 10,000 who wouldn't let go of the fig in the jar[1] if a lion was approaching rapidly.
Repetition doesn't prove a point...
MIMX wrote:
Doctor? wrote: wont work. Too many stupid greedy monkeys.
In a society that lauds greed and selfishness, what a surprise
.
All human nature isn't fixed and immutable, and is greatly influenced by environment. Homo-sapiens as a species are inherently social and co-operative.
neo-Social Darwinian arguments like the above tend to collapse, as we are not mere monkeys/rats/lab animals, rather we are the only animal capable of fully realising our plans in reality (praxis) we, and we alone among the animals, create the conditions of our own existence.
Leninism, Maoism and a dozen other ism's have been tried (but all are/were basically State Capitalism as opposed to Private Capitalism). Marxism on the other hand has never been tried. There has never been a stateless classless system of society based upon the common ownership and democratic control of the means and instruments for producing and distributing wealth by and in the interest of the whole community.
I wish people would stop dragging me into political discussions. "Won't someone please think of the children!"
So clue me in on what YOU have done to fix the water issue you brought up?????
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.” -Theodore Roosevelt-
Was Agitate Educate OrganiseT.I.C too subtle for you?
In reply to you quoting Teddy; "The ruling ideology is the ideology of the ruling classes." Karl Marx.
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfils the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things." Churchill:- Auld Troy Fuckwit. It was conveniently forgotten that he sent tanks into George Square (Glasgow) against women and children peacefully protesting slum landlords rent rises.
"I saw the spectre of charity And it didn't look too brotherly Propping up what should be Blown Away!" One of the few people who could write a song as well as Ian Curtis, Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you Roddy Frame.
Millions die for want of food and water, while the EEC pays farmers to take land out of production, to keep prices artificially inflated. Their stockpiles are so large that they have "wine lakes" and "butter mountains". While politicians harp on about overpopulation and other Malthusian nonsense, the WHO (World Health Organization) recently estimated that we could comfortably feed a world population 3 times it's current size.
Anyone who supports a system which allows this to happen needs to closely examine their conscience. Someone, I forget who, once said "As long as one man is enslaved no man is free" we are all tainted by a slave mentality (and it's consequent horrors).
"But oh no, not you, don't wipe your eyes over lies, Just let them shine their blue, On every whisper that welcomes the inconceivable, And the birth of the true.
I'd sack the world and make a second start, I'd sack my head until I found my heart, I'd fill the distance with a red parade, And burn the banks down while the bugles played. "The Birth Of The True" (Roddy Frame) Aztec Camera.
MIMX wrote: Was Agitate Educate OrganiseT.I.C too subtle for you?
Agitate - mention it in an F1 thread Educate - put up facts on a F1 thread Organise - nicely arranged your quotes with cute colors.
So cutting through the bullshit.....nothing.
![]()
"Nothing" your sum total knowledge of me. "Bullshit" your resorting to personal attacks in the face of solid reasoning and irrefutable facts.
Pointless any further discussion with someone attempting to defend a system which causes the deaths of millions of children, and adults, year in year out.
"I've seen the nights, filled with bloodsport and pain, And the bodies obtained, the bodies obtained. Where will it end? where will it end? Where will it end? where will it end?" Day Of The Lords.
"Just to see you torn apart, Witness to your empty heart. I need it. I need it. I need it". No love lost.
You can have the final word if you want, 'cause frankly I wasn't going to dignify your above post/personal attack with a reply.
Edd wrote: ...if a piece of debris had hit him in the head, he would have been buggered
No, that's what happens if a peice of cock hits him in the asshole ![]()
MIMX wrote: "Nothing" your sum total knowledge of me. "Bullshit" your resorting to personal attacks in the face of solid reasoning and irrefutable facts.
Pointless any further discussion with someone attempting to defend a system which causes the deaths of millions of children, and adults, year in year out.
You can have the final word if you want, 'cause frankly I wasn't going to dignify your above post/personal attack with a reply.
I have not made any personal attacks.
You stated that I assumed incorrectly; you have done something PROACTIVE on this issue you brought up.
I asked you to enlighten me on what YOU have done to be proactive (and not meant in a facetious way).
Instead you answered with NOTHING but a vague statement, so YOU have let me assume that YOU have done NOTHING about this water issue you brought up.
For some reason you think distracting the question with a debate on capitalism/Marxism makes the question go away. But I'm not asking or getting involved in any political discussion, only asking what YOU have done to be proactive on the water situation.
So if I am completely incorrect, and you have DONE something (other than bitch and whine on an F1 thread), PLEASE ENLIGHTEN ME.
Its all bollocks!!
Someone who hijacks this thread, to slate the waste of resources involved in an, admittedly, high budget sport, (but one that creates jobs in impoverished countries i might add and as Cambo said is a drop in the ocean in the global scheme of things) but from his postings on WIM, is clearly a Football fan! Yeah so Football (and im not anti by the way) doesnt waste any resources does it? Just a tiny bit hypocritical IMO
Doctor? wrote: FIVE BILLION die? from a population of 7 Billion?
PS, you might want to avoid the following so you can continue to hold your belief that F1 is pointless.....
Cars with ABS and traction control, as well as safety cells. Bussess and Trains (turbo chargers are an F1 invention). Any "green" car (using F1 derived ECUs). Most non-aircraft applications of carbon fibre.
Which technologies has football developed? Chav resistant stadium walls (fell over in Heisel, stayed up in Hillsborough)
Turbo was not created or even developped by F1. In fact, they took turbo from streets to apply in F1. And didn`t work well. Too expensive and dangerous.
Server Error in "/" Application wrote:
Doctor? wrote: FIVE BILLION die? from a population of 7 Billion?
PS, you might want to avoid the following so you can continue to hold your belief that F1 is pointless.....
Cars with ABS and traction control, as well as safety cells. Bussess and Trains (turbo chargers are an F1 invention). Any "green" car (using F1 derived ECUs). Most non-aircraft applications of carbon fibre.
Which technologies has football developed? Chav resistant stadium walls (fell over in Heisel, stayed up in Hillsborough)
Turbo was not created or even developped by F1. In fact, they took turbo from streets to apply in F1. And didn`t work well. Too expensive and dangerous.
Depends on whether you judge well by BMW getting 1600 horse power from 1.6 litres, or by the sight of syncronised Renault detonations really. You sure it was on the roads first?
(mind you, the traction control on BNW's current F1 engine is lifted from the road going 5 series.....hmmmmmm, hardly justifies the "we need cheating devices so we can develope them for granny's run down to tesco" does it)
It was 1.5, not 1.6. You see 1.5 engines with 1600 hps on streets? That was specifically created for F1, and for qualifiying only. F1 was not laboratory for what we have on streets today, despite may had contributed with one or other thing.
BIGINOIL wrote:
Edd wrote: ...if a piece of debris had hit him in the head, he would have been buggered
No, that's what happens if a peice of cock hits him in the asshole
is that the bill clinton definition?
surely he'd have to receive at least 50% of the shaft?
What the hell are you guys on about? The first turbo used on a car was not on the streets, but in the good ol' US of A F1........in the 50's for the Indy 500. And the first street car was a US of A car as well, the 60's the Chevrolet Corvair.
EdelBrock wrote: What the hell are you guys on about? The first turbo used on a car was not on the streets, but in the good ol' US of A F1........in the 50's for the Indy 500. And the first street car was a US of A car as well, the 60's the Chevrolet Corvair.
500 cars had turbo's back then?
I had no idea, I knew they had superchargers at some point.
Juan Pablo Montoya after winning the Indy500 at the first attempt...."THey should just velcro down the gass pedal and leave us in peace to turn left all day"
Turbos were first designed for ships (. Than WWII brought in the American fighter jets that used turbos. It was only one guy in the 50's, don't remember the name, but he had a diesel engine. I think the first gasoline engine was in the Chevy Corvair....and it wasn't very reliable. My sister has a Covair Monza Spyder, and (my personal opinion) its a peice of crap.
EdelBrock wrote: What the hell are you guys on about? The first turbo used on a car was not on the streets, but in the good ol' US of A F1........in the 50's for the Indy 500. And the first street car was a US of A car as well, the 60's the Chevrolet Corvair.
Hmm, so that`s why turbocharged cars on those days were shite ![]()
Anyway, what I said is that F1 didnt invent or developped the technology. Of course, turbo was used in prodution cars after being used in ships, airplanes or race cars. But trucks used turbo diesel engines before the race cars. So its not like the "racing world" had invented the whole thing.