Political Challenge

I have already stated weakness of Bush and McCain and can think unbiasedly on politics (or at least so I imagine:p ), but my challenge is if anyone can actually give negatives of the current candidate(s) (no matter which country) that they are actually for and back....

Well???

The fact that Obama walks on water indicates he's a weak swimmer.

nice try

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

So can you rise to the challenge? I'll make it easier, you can even mention something sincerly positive and endearing about the opposing party (in a non-sarcastic way)

EdelBrock wrote:

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

So can you rise to the challenge? I'll make it easier, you can even mention something sincerly positive and endearing about the opposing party (in a non-sarcastic way)

The "challenge" is too pointless for me to bother...

so in other words you can't step up to it eh?

EdelBrock wrote: so in other words you can't step up to it eh?

"Can't" has nothing to do with it.

Can't be bothered has everything to do with it. It's an utterly pointless exercise.

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

EdelBrock wrote: so in other words you can't step up to it eh?

"Can't" has nothing to do with it.

Can't be bothered has everything to do with it. It's an utterly pointless exercise.

EdelBrock wrote:

Exactly!

Comrade Shampanyov wrote:

EdelBrock wrote: so in other words you can't step up to it eh?

"Can't" has nothing to do with it.

Can't be bothered has everything to do with it. It's an utterly pointless exercise.

Funny your disclaimer doesn't match your next sentence