GlasVegas wrote:
PETER COATES'S BELATED REDEMPTION wrote:
I really don't understand why there's been so much fuss about this: there's so little that's redeemable from "Britpop", including Blur, a band who peaked - what? - at least 15 years ago. Coxon has always been wildly overrated; James lapsed into self-parody years ago; the drummer's a fucking GINGER; and even though Albarn's made some interesting records since, he still can't be forgiven for all that endless Essex boy would-be hoolie "Chelsea-supporting" mockney bullshit. Can he???!?
Obviously, the various New Order tours over the last decade+ have been about nostalgia as much as anything else, but at least there's some genuine longevity and discernible influence in what they did in the 80s.....Blur just sound like student disco pap circa 1995. I was a student then, and I still find it quite embarrassing.
Or have I missed something?
Once again, you are spot on. Or we're both missing something. Dated stooodent disco fodder. No more, no less.
if you are basing it all on parklife (& it's singles), which you appear to be, then yes, you are both missing something
define peaked frads - do you mean in the charts/ tabloids?
you certainly can't mean musically
they developed the sound a long way from brit pop & the songs have a huge range of sounds/feels from wonderfully understated introspection to everything including the kitchen sink over the top madness
this is a low, to the end, tender & the universal are worlds away from the mockney pop of girls & boys, parklife & charmless man
as disparate as advert, popscene & song two are from more experimental stuff like trimm trabb, oily water & no distance left to run
it does seem rather like you are pigeonholing & generalising hugely.