Skip to content

November 8th 2001 Statistics

Locked Archived

63 replies · 1,642 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Originally posted by Dutch Jim says: NO! And you know, I think that it is not about the number of posts you make, or the average number of posts that you make per logon, but it is more about the quality of the posts............ and I have seen many, many (way to many!!) nonsense discussions and nonsense posts, and furthermore a lot of discussions that keep repeating (which group do you like best next to New Order, which singles do you like best of New Order, top ten of albums, top ten of this, top ten of that, etc. etc. etc.!!!!! :sleep:.... well, all those posts should be corrected in the statistics. So please Nicolas and Seb, make all these corrections ( :violent: ) and make a table of correction factors so that we all know what kind of post will be worth how many points and so on............... or shall we go back again to the ordinary function of a forum, having nice discussions irrespective of the number of posts???? Nice discussions relating to our joint love: NEW ORDER????!!!!YEAH!!! :jump: :lol: :Dnote: I love this forum and its discussions!!! :clap:

Sorry dude, but my specialist subject is nonsense threads:lol: I agree there should be a league table of how good and how bad a thread is, but I'm afraid I'd be struggling for relegation every season:nod:

0 likes

I dunno Shug, Room 101 was a cracker...despite you not relegating the Manics

0 likes

Originally posted by Seb Briggs I dunno Shug, Room 101 was a cracker...despite you not relegating the Manics

Cheers mate, but I think I used up all my "good thread ideas" on that one alone:lol:

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗