Skip to content

NOOL will have to go through some changes...

Archived

57 replies · 1,272 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Well, as some of you might have noticed, we have been off-line for 10 hours, it was an error by our host, but nevertheless we'll have some changes to do...

It's quite simple really, NOOL is too popular, the website got 1,339,802 hits last week, we used to have that for a MONTH just 2 years ago, we had 22,177 visitors just this last week (9,872 different people within that, or should I say, 9872 different IP addresses.

It's not so bad, but considering we used 16 Gigabytes of bandwidth in 1 week and my "plan" limits be to 1 per month, something will have to be done.

First step, moving media files somewhere else, I will probably put them on my home network, but that means they will be accessible via either FTP or Web on a different port, meaning they might not work everywhere due to firewall restrictions.. I don't mind, I know most people on this website visit the forum. that's responsable for 8.5 GB of last week.

There has been about 4 Gigabytes of GIF and JPEG sent last week, plus 1.5 Gigabytes only for the forum page of the main and off-topic forum (ASPX page), that is WAAAAAAAAAY too much.

So I'll have to ligthen everything in the forum, use less graphic, and probably won't be able to host avatar here, but I will do my best so it won't influence anything, since I have an unrestricted plan at home, I can use that without any problem.

0 likes

General Statistics

Hits Entire Site (Successful) 1,339,802 Average Per Day 133,980 Home Page 14,030 Page Views Page Views (Impressions) 124,815 Average Per Day 12,481 Document Views 15,100 Visits Visits 22,177 Average Per Day 2,217 Average Visit Length 00:14:18 Median Visit Length 00:05:45 International Visits 4.33% Visits of Unknown Origin 86.3% Visits from United States 9.36% Visitors Unique Visitors 9,872 Visitors Who Visited Once 7,471 Visitors Who Visited More Than Once 2,401

Average Hits Per Day - Number of successful hits divided by the total number of days in the log.

Average Page Views Per Day - Number of page views divided by the total number of days in the log.

Average Visits Per Day - Number of visits divided by the total number of days in the log.

Average Visit Length - Average of non-zero length visits in the log.

Hit - A single action on the Web server as it appears in the log file. A visitor downloading a single file is logged as a single hit, while a visitor requesting a Web page including two images registers as three hits on the server; one hit is the request for the .html page, and two additional hits are requests for the downloaded image files. While the volume of hits is an indicator of Web server traffic, it is not an accurate reflection of how many pages are being looked at.

Hits: Entire Site (Successful) - Number of hits that had a "success" status code.

International Visits - Percentage of visitors defined as "international" in Domain Options.

Home Page Hits - Number of times your home page was visited.

Median Visit Length - Median of non-zero length visits in the log. Half the visit lengths are longer than the median, and half are shorter. This number is often closer to the "typical" visit length than the average visit length. Numbers that are wildly atypical can skew the average, but will not skew the median so much.

Page - Any document, dynamic page, or form. Documents are user-defined in Options, but typically include all static content, such as complete html pages. Dynamic pages are created with variables and do not exist anywhere in a static form. Forms are scripted pages which get information from a visitor and pass it back to the server.

Page Views - Hits to files designated as pages. Supporting graphics and other non-page files are not counted.

Page Views: Document Views - Hits to pages that are defined as documents. This entry excludes hits to dynamic pages and forms.

Unique Visitors- Individuals who visited your site during the report period. If someone visits more than once, they are counted only the first time they visit.

Visits - Number of times a visitor came to your site. If a visitor is idle longer than the idle-time limit, WebTrends assumes the visit was voluntarily terminated. If the visitor continues to browse your site after they reach the idle-time limit, a new visit is counted. The default idle-time limit is thirty minutes.

Visits from the United States - Percentage of visitors from the United States.

Visits of Unknown Origin - Percentage of visitors from an origin that could not be determined.

Visitors Who Visited More Than Once - Number of individual visitors who appear more than once in the log file. Individuals can be tracked by IP addresses, domain names, and cookies. Cookies provide the most accurate count.

Visitors Who Visited Once - Number of individual visitors who appear only once in the log file. Individuals can be tracked by IP addresses, domain names, and cookies. Cookies provide the most accurate

0 likes

Most Accessed File Types

File type Files Kbytes 1 gif 381,272 1,032,557 2 jpg 177,084 2,565,503 3 aspx 53,213 1,139,101 4 js 42,268 415,355 5 aspx?ForumID=1 10,507 1,197,044 6 css 9,445 23,758 7 aspx?ForumID=8 4,535 499,172 8 aspx?MediaTypeID=1 3,970 818,358 9 aspx?MediaTypeID=2 3,214 7,438,904 10 aspx?ForumID=10 2,465 284,283 11 aspx?NewsID=777 1,018 12,309 12 aspx?ForumID=7 738 82,533 13 ico 671 373 14 aspx?ContinentID=1 490 8,715 15 aspx?ForumID=2 488 48,194 16 aspx?MediaTypeID=3 482 486,189

0 likes

Just goes to show what an amazingly popular and valuable resource this is for us all !

A few ideas regarding reduction of gifs etc - there's an enormous amount of replication of gifs and jpegs on the live pages. Mind if I work on an alternative live history format to suggest ?

Avatars could go as far as I am concerned, they are the devil's tapioca for anyone using the site at work. Having the option to switch them off helps from that perspective, but doesn't reduce the data transfer burden.

Would you consider allowing certain areas of the site to be housed on different servers ? I'd be happy to host some parts of it if required.

I guess the chat facility, which hasn't been a roaring success, may be a substantial bandwidth user as well. Worth treating it as an experiment that didn't work, and consigning it to the "ideas can" ? We could always agree on a particular external chatroom, if there is sufficient demand (and I doubt there is !)

0 likes

A few ideas regarding reduction of gifs etc - there's an enormous amount of replication of gifs and jpegs on the live pages. Mind if I work on an alternative live history format to suggest ?

Not at all...

Avatars could go as far as I am concerned, they are the devil's tapioca for anyone using the site at work. Having the option to switch them off helps from that perspective, but doesn't reduce the data transfer burden.

You can turn them off you know ;)

Would you consider allowing certain areas of the site to be housed on different servers ? I'd be happy to host some parts of it if required.

I don't think we can do that because of the dynamic content, only things like images and media files could be hosted elsewhere and they are the reason why so much bandwidth is used.

I guess the chat facility, which hasn't been a roaring success, may be a substantial bandwidth user as well. Worth treating it as an experiment that didn't work, and consigning it to the "ideas can" ? We could always agree on a particular external chatroom, if there is sufficient demand (and I doubt there is !)

I haven't seen the chat room listed anywhere for that, and you know, the chat room is probably one of the most bandwidth efficient place, because it uses frame.. if I use frame for NOOL (top menu for instance), it would save a lot of bandwidth...

I need to be more efficient, that's all.. buttons are images, menus are heavy javascript, etc...

I will work with WenOrder a lighter version, but anyone who have good ideas is more than welcome to submit them..

It's evident the "v3.0" effect is probably a good reason why there is so much bandwidth use, and I'll work to eliminate this, the .NET platform uses hidden fields to stock data, hence more bandwidth sent to the user...

0 likes

Originally posted by Spotnick and probably won't be able to host avatar here

Obviously this doesn't apply to me cos my avatar is so damn good.

right? :eek3:

0 likes

Thank feck, your back ... spent good portion of mornin thinkin I'd been barred

I'll cool me boots now

0 likes

Originally posted by Spotnick It's quite simple really, NOOL is too popular,

More than the band themselves!

0 likes

And all without a Fac number .. :D

0 likes

Originally posted by Spotnick General Statistics Hits Entire Site (Successful) 1,339,802 Average Per Day 133,980 Home Page 14,030 Page Views Page Views (Impressions) 124,815 Average Per Day 12,481 Document Views 15,100 Visits Visits 22,177 Average Per Day 2,217 Average Visit Length 00:14:18 Median Visit Length 00:05:45 International Visits 4.33% Visits of Unknown Origin 86.3% Visits from United States 9.36% Visitors Unique Visitors 9,872 Visitors Who Visited Once 7,471 Visitors Who Visited More Than Once 2,401

Why visits from US are not included in the international visits statistics? I thought this was a Canadian forum. Or maybe you consider Canada as a 51st state :evil4:

And no "cunts per week"?

0 likes

Originally posted by Server Error in "/" Application > Originally posted by Spotnick> General Statistics > > Hits Entire Site (Successful) 1,339,802 > Average Per Day 133,980 > Home Page 14,030 > Page Views Page Views (Impressions) 124,815 > Average Per Day 12,481 > Document Views 15,100 > Visits Visits 22,177 > Average Per Day 2,217 > Average Visit Length 00:14:18 > Median Visit Length 00:05:45 > International Visits 4.33% > Visits of Unknown Origin 86.3% > Visits from United States 9.36% > Visitors Unique Visitors 9,872 > Visitors Who Visited Once 7,471 > Visitors Who Visited More Than Once 2,401

Why visits from US are not included in the international visits statistics? I thought this was a Canadian forum. Or maybe you consider Canada as a 51st state :evil4:

And no "cunts per week"? :laugh::laugh::laugh:

0 likes

Originally posted by Garymac And all without a Fac number .. :D

Indeed!

To be honest, the package that it would take to support the load we're using is near 200$/month...

0 likes

Originally posted by Spotnick > Originally posted by Garymac> And all without a Fac number .. :D

Indeed!

To be honest, the package that it would take to support the load we're using is near 200$/month...

Perhaps you should forward those stats to a.h.wilson@uphisownarse.com and see if you/we can get yourself/ourselves a little bit of official recognition.

Still flying the flag this late in the day? Who's got the medals....????

0 likes

I'd hazard a guess that the band dont give a flying f...k if theres an offical site or not, it seems to be left up to their record label who havent exactly crafted sites any greater than a quick promo advert for their latest release :rolleyes:

Still is it that important for it to be the "official" site, to most if not all of us on here it is in our eyes, and thats what surely matters.

Im pretty damn sure that no other site bar none has as much daily traffic and detailed information/news as this one.

Every snippet of TV/Media/SideProject news is kept pretty much bang up to date and if NewOrder so much as put one too many sugars in their tea its reported on here within about 5 minutes :lol:

0 likes

Originally posted by Spotnick Most Accessed File Types File type Files Kbytes 1 gif 381,272 1,032,557 2 jpg 177,084 2,565,503 3 aspx 53,213 1,139,101

Hmm, I wonder what the "average size" of an avatar is? You could put a size-restriction if you don't already have it. I also wonder how much extra overhead the aspx-code adds... It may seem small on a per page basis, but when you add it up...

I hope you can stay "uncommercialized" as long as possible.

/TLV

0 likes

Just been running some like for like comparisons between NOOL and WIM, er sorry, FAC441.

Twelve hits a week by one unique user doesn't sound very impressive. Especially as he's only there because he's banned here...

0 likes

How do you get rid of the avatar - I don't need mine - It's Gary Fisher mountain Bike pioneer anyway not me.

0 likes

That's one way I suppose, I uploaded nothing, but it's a bit ugly.

0 likes

Originally posted by Old Blue Just been running some like for like comparisons between NOOL and WIM, er sorry, FAC441. Twelve hits a week by one unique user doesn't sound very impressive. Especially as he's only there because he's banned here...

:rofl:

Clive, you are killing me... :D

0 likes

Originally posted by Spotnick > Originally posted by Garymac> And all without a Fac number .. :D

Indeed!

To be honest, the package that it would take to support the load we're using is near 200$/month...

I know a libertarian like me should not be proposing new taxes but what about a "Cure Thread Levy" Everytime someone mentions the Cure has to pay say 1 quid, then 2 quid for Barry manilow and 5 for Depish .

0 likes

Perhaps you should forward those stats to a.h.wilson@uphisownarse.com and see if you/we can get yourself/ourselves a little bit of official recognition.

Speaking of which, anyone knows how we can contact Tony Wilson?

I don't want a FAC number for the website, but I'd sure love one for Community !!!

But all the damned email addresses I have don't work, this "factory records" website hasn't been updated in the last 4 years, so I don't expect much!

0 likes

Originally posted by Old Blue Just been running some like for like comparisons between NOOL and WIM, er sorry, FAC441. Twelve hits a week by one unique user doesn't sound very impressive. Especially as he's only there because he's banned here...

So... it must be the only forum in the web with eccho.

0 likes

Banning the posting of images in threads should make a huge difference. That bloody paperclips thread has been resurrected, surefire bandwidth killer.

0 likes

Originally posted by Low-Life Banning the posting of images in threads should make a huge difference. That bloody paperclips thread has been resurrected, surefire bandwidth killer.

Not at all, as those images are not hosted here...

0 likes

I've decided to put Molly on hiatus, and go for the plain look.

--Sam

0 likes

Originally posted by The Happy One I've decided to put Molly on hiatus, and go for the plain look.--Sam

NOOOOOOO!!!!!! Not Molly!! :love2:

0 likes

Did you get my email, Sir?

--Sam

0 likes

Originally posted by The Happy One Did you get my email, Sir?--Sam

Just did...checking.........................................

0 likes

Originally posted by Sir CHUNKS > Originally posted by The Happy One> Did you get my email, Sir?> > --Sam

Just did...checking.........................................

You've got mail...:thumb: Molly? Oh where for art thou Molly!!? (Iread the other thread dealing with the avatars...I just wanted to ask to be a pain!!):D

0 likes

Media files are offline for the day, just checking how much bandwidth will be eliminated by this.

The site has been down for bloody 8 hours today and yet we used 21 gb of bandwidth..

It's amazing...

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗