Skip to content

Phils Keyboards? Real? Fake?

Archived

86 replies · 4,263 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Craigy, put me down as sort of 2.5. Somewhere in the middle( 3-ward leanings) but with a strong desire to stuff stratocasters down the gobs of rock luddites. Especially rock luddites who know very little about keyboards.

Again we hear this thing about people not comprehending the difference between preprogramming a machine to perform it's part live, where it essentially takes on the role of a classical musician, ie it merely does it's best to repeat what's in front of it with as little crazy input of it's own as possible. Of course machines are even more barmy than concert violinists which is where to fun lies. There is genuine skill in setting up a song to run live, greater skill still in being the "conductor" who makes sure all the little digital and analogue beasites to your bidding with the minimum of daftness, and a true art lies in those who can run a pile of machines UNprogramemd, or at least live modified. New Order abandoned that early on, but they were MASTERS, all those early versions of the electronically based songs are superb examples of how to operate and create with machines live......I mean those EGG-temptaion-586 meddleys...."when I'm with you"....that's what they are capable of, what so many bands like mine fail to be as good at, but which people like Orbital and the Chemical Brothers have taken to new heights.

Tapes/DATS/ADATS/HDR's all of it is a con, a rip off and not in the spirit of new order ( one I learned from them). I'd rather have BM fall over half way through an approximation of the record than LISTEN TO A CD WITH BARNEY FORGETTING THE WORDS (AND FAILING TO READ THEM) LIKE SOME DEMENTED KAROKE FAILURE!!!!!!!!!!!!

There does seem a fundamental lack of understanding here about what exactly a keyboard with a MIDI or FIREWIRE of CV connection is actually UP to.

I mean I will honestly make some short test recordings with my Moog if you would like to HEAR the difference between tape and live.

Oh, and I too seem to have missed a point, I didn't realise Phil was being accused of miming over the sequenced parts. I have THOUGHT I seen that but dismissed it as him doubling the part or as sound sync ....I guess I was in denial.....miming is the work of satan and I hope the cunt's hands fall off.

0 likes

Chemical wrote: I don't think Phil is miming and, if he is, he's not doing it on all the synth parts he's obliged to play (or look like he's playing).

There's a fair bit of kit still on-stage with them at the moment. They used to cart around several synths, a rack of effects, samplers, at least one drum machine, a keys mixer and a sequencer. That's been slimmed down since the Get Ready gigs to Phil's Roland XP-80, an all-singing, all-dancing 'workstation' synth. Steve uses a Kurzweil synth for his parts, although I think he's switching programmed drum patterns and maybe triggering samples too.

Barney uses another synth on Blue Monday only really but I've seen him share one with Gillian in the past! The other 'new' synths on Phil's rack - one's a MonoMachine which is a new one on me and I'm a synth nutter! - which was MIDId up so I take it it was contributing layers here and there. A good deal of the synth parts are sequenced or maybe recorded on their hard drive recorder (which sits to the left of Steve's drum kit; you can see it on their various TV performances).

Phil breaks off from playing guitar on Krafty to play the bells bit so one would think he was actually playing it rather than miming. Barney must've improved as a musician overall because he can now sing and play at the same time, the majority of the Order's past material being typified by him singing inbetween playing!

Using any kind of recorded media or live sequencing poses a question over what you play live over it and what would either sound better sequenced/recorded or played live. When I gigged with a similar setup, I preferred to alternate so I was playing a bassline on one song, chords on another and a lead part on another. It's up to them really.

Ahhhh....sense. Well aprt from our strict "tape is strictly for bits of old movies and open university shows to play in at random". I think I have only ever let a song play out, as arranged, unremixed, untweaked, once....and that was at the end of a 5 1/2 hr set.....I found a tune in it's studio form, loaded it, hit play and skinned up.

BTW... http://www.monomachine.com/

We have their "machinedrum"....what a fucking odd device, a pure drum synth, no samples, deadly clever and built like it was designed for knocking brick shithouses down.

0 likes

Steve, you know Barney's got a Machinedrum as well...I too got one (the new UW-one with sampling) and I know they invited Daniel at Elektron backstage when they played Circus in Stockholm on the GR tour. I guess they recently bought the Monomachine as well (I great fucked up machine...got one myself) and that is good news...if they actually tend to use it in the studio that is.

0 likes

Steve Campbell wrote: Again we hear this thing about people not comprehending the difference between preprogramming a machine to perform it's part live, where it essentially takes on the role of a classical musician, ie it merely does it's best to repeat what's in front of it with as little crazy input of it's own as possible. Of course machines are even more barmy than concert violinists which is where to fun lies. There is genuine skill in setting up a song to run live, greater skill still in being the "conductor" who makes sure all the little digital and analogue beasites to your bidding with the minimum of daftness, and a true art lies in those who can run a pile of machines UNprogramemd, or at least live modified. New Order abandoned that early on, but they were MASTERS, all those early versions of the electronically based songs are superb examples of how to operate and create with machines live......I mean those EGG-temptaion-586 meddleys...."when I'm with you"....that's what they are capable of, what so many bands like mine fail to be as good at, but which people like Orbital and the Chemical Brothers have taken to new heights.

By the way, would be great to have so mp3 or something like that of of those EGG-temptaion-586 medleys. Never had a chance to hear those and I certainly would like to.

On another note, and to once again agree with Steve C. and take it a bit further, sequenced stuff and things like that are norma with electronic music, I mean it goes with the medium/instrument.

You can't pretend to like people who do electronic music and than complain there's loops and everything. But, as I said before, even if it's just triggering some sequences by pressing buttons, you have to actually press those buttons, that's playing electronic music live, that's normal. And as Steve says, things at least can happen.

On the other hand, what can happen with tapes/dats/etc except for dat failures And miming over tapes must be the ultimate insult...

0 likes

lowlife wrote: Steve, you know Barney's got a Machinedrum as well...I too got one (the new UW-one with sampling) and I know they invited Daniel at Elektron backstage when they played Circus in Stockholm on the GR tour. I guess they recently bought the Monomachine as well (I great fucked up machine...got one myself) and that is good news...if they actually tend to use it in the studio that is.

only heard the Demo's so far....good to know tho that NO still look for good gear outside the "big 3" manufacturers. And you have to admit their build quality is hilarious...I'm fairly sure you could run a train over the machinedrum without it skipping a semiquaver. Pretty much "roadie-proof"

Great company, great gear.

Everything really clever comes out of sheds :)

0 likes

Buster Klumpy wrote:

By the way, would be great to have so mp3 or something like that of of those EGG-temptaion-586 medleys. Never had a chance to hear those and I certainly would like to.

On another note, and to once again agree with Steve C. and take it a bit further, sequenced stuff and things like that are norma with electronic music, I mean it goes with the medium/instrument.

You can't pretend to like people who do electronic music and than complain there's loops and everything. But, as I said before, even if it's just triggering some sequences by pressing buttons, you have to actually press those buttons, that's playing electronic music live, that's normal. And as Steve says, things at least can happen.

On the other hand, what can happen with tapes/dats/etc except for dat failures And miming over tapes must be the ultimate insult...

Doubly so from the band who turned down their country's top music show 2 ( or maybe 3) times cos they wouldn't let em play live....before BM's success forced their hand.

I'll see about zipping up some NO electrostupidities and figure out a way of gettin em to you.

FOr now...check out EGG and Temptation on Taras, and the entire Milan 82 gig.....the encore is beyond belief....New Order, wasted, playing a Sparks song for like 20 minutes, most of which is in the "I wonder what happens if I press this button" category.

I offered the following to a ranting guitar cave creature one day...

Right mate, set your amp, guitar, strap, pick and cable down. I'll tip out my kit bag and unload the rig from the van. Now I'll go into that room with your gear and a tape deck, and you stay in here with mine, and I'll see you in an hour to compare results.......oddly enough he mumbled something about not even knowing where the wires went and declined. ( I also made a DJ the same offer when he shot ME down for calling his lots thieves and conmen...I even offered to plug it all up and preload sounds for him....no dice....coward).

I've played 100+ gigs as a bassplayer (mainly cos at college I was fuckin rent-a-bass), and 30-50 as a "machine tamer" as I like to be called (or as a flyer once reffered to the show "live misuse of technology"). And let me tell you, playin a few string, havin a laugh, trying to ignore the singer and guitarist without losing your way, and simultaneously trying to hold a telepathic syncronisation together with the drummer.....is a lot easier than standing behind that wall of machinery....wonder what you forgot to do....wondering what the little bastards are plotting, trying to figure out which one of them's gonna go for a solo for no reason, trying to 2nd guess exactly how overloaded the Juno will be ( Campbell's first law of audio engineering "the juno is too loud"....every single time I've committed one to tape, the first time I listen back all I can hear is a juno 106 or 6 or 60 shrieking with some other sounds in the background).....and of course suddenly remembering that what you forgot to do was load the drumkit so when you throw the fader up expecting to see the hall errupot, fuck all happens and you look really stupid.

It's interesting what Chemical was saying about choosing what shou'd go in what format. Generally most stuff we do is sequenced ( tho sometimes on the fly, from empty), much of it is based on the manipulation of relatively short looping midi parts. Manipulation via MIDI, via control panels, via the sequencer, and via the mixer. We also do a bit of live playing too, things like the Moog, my bass, the occasional glissando guitar part.

BUT, I have used play-in material as an engineer, both during a bands performance and in between bands when I served as a psuedo-dj keepin the music going while things were arranged ( the best thing about the proliferation of the billions of bedroom DJ's was that it enabled to fook off to the bar between bands). And the thing I always find with prerecorded material[1], is it's impossible to match to the perfromance. If the band a sucking ass really badly, the playback can really show them up ( especially if it's only used on one or two tracks which suddenly sound spectacular), and if the band are really on fire the playback can be a total bucket of water over them.

BTW...FWIW, I think of MDF's (that's midi data filers) as exactly the same as tape. Yes the machines can still go wobbly but, there are 2 other things to take into account. 1. and MDF is a playback only unit, not an insrument in any way, it just spits out what you put in. 2. they are inavarialby used by the sorts of people who buy korg M1's and other annoying workstation machines that have shite all interactivity of their own, and rarely fail in any kind of amusing way (unless you count the M1 that exploded on stage for a jazz band I used to play in....we all cheered...hateful car-advert generating cack-pile)

EDIT:::: AND ANOTHER THING..... anyone else remember the luddite stickers on metal albums through the late 80's and 90's? "No synthesizers or samplers of ANY KIND (this is important...ANY kind) used on this recording,"

And track one opens with swathes of digital reverb on the guitars and snares, and a pre-verb and whacking great digital delay over the vocals.

Digital Delay=Automatic, user talent unrequired sampler. Digital reverb=Sampler AND often synth

Morons.

[1]In my personal way of doing things these problems never affected our sequenced stuff....but we did have a FOH engineer at a multiband night who played us in at about -40dB and treated us like programme music....that bit.

0 likes
  1. Electronic's first album is in my eyes on of the 3 best albums made in modern pop history. It just breathes new optimism and echoes the feelings of being creative geniuses in a fucked up industrial city where you either play football, mug people or create music. It is a blend of very creative people at their peaks in their careers that simply gets to me everytime I listen to it. Incredible.

Strangly enough I was just listening to it and yes, it is as good as I remember it. To say he and Marr hit their creative stride on that album is not to put too fine a point on it. The Patience Of A Saint gets me every time. I will never forget seeing Barney and Johnny welcome the PSBs on-stage at Wembley Hall One to do the track live as well as Getting Away With It. Apparently the lyric to GAWI is Tennant's idea of a Morrissey lyric!

As Steve says, understanding technology can be a lot more demanding than picking up a guitar, plugging it in and playing something. Most bits of tech gear have probably too many functions but then some people like them deep and complex!

0 likes

I am quite amazed at what most New Order fans have settled for over the years as far as live performances go. I have always believed that regardless of how great you sound in the studio, it don't matter if you can't pull it off live. And NO are perhaps the WORST live band I have ever heard as far as performance. Barney could not carry a tune in a plastic bucket with handles. It may sound harsh and it will probably flame a few NO fans and that's ok. It does not take away from the energy or entertainment value of the band at all but my God they are an awful band live. At least Depeche Mode/Dave Gahan despite public battles with drug and drink as well has maintained good health and physical shape. Despite some describing DM's music as gay...at least live the songs sound CLOSE in tone to their studio counterparts and not only that...the synths are actually played...FOR REAL. I think NO fans have learned to tolerate the bitter taste of mediocrity when it comes to NO live performances. Now that being said...we will see in a few months if DM has suffered the same fate NO has when they begin their tour in October.

0 likes

Buster Klumpy wrote:

By the way, would be great to have so mp3 or something like that of of those EGG-temptaion-586 medleys. Never had a chance to hear those and I certainly would like to.

Your wish shall come true tomorrow sir.....

0 likes

Now you're just being delusional. DM used to bring all thier drums in off tape. And their stage was full of sequencers.

Anyway...basic math....4 guys...more than four parts.

I have no problem with that (apart from the taped drums, for which I hold the current NO in equal contempt), but they do not play all the parts "live for real", some of them are played by the silicon based band members, fookin ape creatures always trying to take the credit!!

As for New Order Live....well yeah, barney's the village idiot, but so what. As I said, if they should have ANY of their set on a CD, it should be the vocals. But tape machines can't do curtis gags and grab their dicks at american audiences who just don't get it.

But Steve is one of the finest drummers I have ever heard. All of them have an imacculate sense of rhythm ( machines do not bend to suit you like a drummer will), in fact if you;ve seen NO story, Quincy Jones says they're the tightest band he ever worked with....which is pretty scary praise for a bunch of white guys from a guy who's produced some of the best RnB and Funk ever, and written some SERIOUSLY good songs (would you believe THAT song in the italian job is one of his!!?!!).

I heard a gig recently, where the sequebcer burped and started paying in like 5/4 time on the start of temptaion....Steve just joined in, and while Gillian sorted the beast, he and hooky rattled out temptation accoustically....then Gillian just drops the machine beat back in in PERFECT time, they had not lost 1 bpm after maybe 20 bars.....AND Gillian knew how to press play properly (laugh if you like, but ANYONE here who's ever ad to bring a sequencer or drummachine in by hand will know that EVERY machine needs it's own VERY special touch to get it to start when YOU want.

That ability to play so tightly against computers and living analogues is ULTRA-RARE!

If you want a live gig like a studio performance, I already suggested elsewhere....buy sound forge and load the cd in, stick a crowd sample behind it, and a bit of hall reverb, save money, stay in, and stay the hell away from any gig I'm going to cos I want to hear something UTTERLY unlike the studio version. My God in some ways NO don;t go far enough, since they stick tightly to arrangements for the most part ( tho that does make it more special when they do "go for it", especially these days). Gimme the Orb any day where you can spend ten mins just wondering what f*in song your actually hearing before the condescend to play a recognisable part.

0 likes

oldmonkey wrote:

Buster Klumpy wrote:

By the way, would be great to have so mp3 or something like that of of those EGG-temptaion-586 medleys. Never had a chance to hear those and I certainly would like to.

Your wish shall come true tomorrow sir.....

Well, thanks a lot, Tim, that would be incredibly nice. And thanks to Steve for offering too. Can't wait to hear this! :clap:

0 likes

Depeche Mode ? You gotta be kidding ! I like them but I saw them twice and it was boring and a lot of stuff was obviously taped.

0 likes

Ive heard Depeche Modes backing tapes from the Violator Tour..

The only thing they had on tape were the drums, basslines, and sequencer parts. All of the other melodies were played live.

I love New Order, but DM have been and still are a lot more tech heavy than NO. While Depeche Modes first album is pretty cheesy, its totally electronic. Dm were making full on electro in 1980 when New Order were still very much a rock band, well, a dark and twisted post punk guitar band.

DM also integrated a lot of heavy sampling of Industrial song textures into thier mid 80s music. Listen to Back Celebration, its a masterpiece. There are layers and layers of synth lines and melodies, stacks of sampled vocal choruses. Metal pipes being hit, sampled, then put thru the Emulator, so that the pipe hits have picth and melody.

Also, I love Barney, But Dave Gahan and Martin Gore have beautiful voices and they harmonize well with each other.

Martin Gore is one of the finest songwriters of his generation. How many other songwriters can incorporate Electro, Synth Pop, Blues, Gospel, and 30's caberet into thier songs, sometimes all on the same album.

Ive seen DM and NO live. DM are much better. Dave and Martin sing better, and while there are mistakes, generally all the synth parts are played correctly.

I dont really care if Dm have a gay image. Thats stupid and childish to dislike a band cause of thier dress. Its the music that counts. DM have produced a lot of very moving and lovely songs. By the way, all the members of DM are married and have 3 kids, so they arent gay (though Martin Gore may have been bi back in the day).

In terms of live, DM these days have more integrity than NO. They play most of thier synth parts live, as opposed to Phil, who mimes his synth parts or playes wanky guitar while the synth is on a backing track. DM also use a live drummer, but he is no Steven Morris. :) But DM to play a lot of thier electronics live, as opposed to NO, who put most of them on a hard drive.

Dont get me wrong. I love New Order. They are one of my all time favorite bands, they have changed the world of music. And the Chicago NO show was amazing.

But Phil really should be playing his synth parts live. Not the sequenced parts, the melodies that you can play with your hands.

I will close by mentioning that Violator by DM and Technique by New Order are my two favorite electro-dance albums.

0 likes

Ive heard Depeche Modes backing tapes from the Violator Tour..

The only thing they had on tape were the drums, basslines, and sequencer parts. All of the other melodies were played live.

I love New Order, but DM have been and still are a lot more tech heavy than NO. While Depeche Modes first album is pretty cheesy, its totally electronic. Dm were making full on electro in 1980 when New Order were still very much a rock band, well, a dark and twisted post punk guitar band.

DM also integrated a lot of heavy sampling of Industrial song textures into thier mid 80s music. Listen to Back Celebration, its a masterpiece. There are layers and layers of synth lines and melodies, stacks of sampled vocal choruses. Metal pipes being hit, sampled, then put thru the Emulator, so that the pipe hits have picth and melody.

Also, I love Barney, But Dave Gahan and Martin Gore have beautiful voices and they harmonize well with each other.

Martin Gore is one of the finest songwriters of his generation. How many other songwriters can incorporate Electro, Synth Pop, Blues, Gospel, and 30's caberet into thier songs, sometimes all on the same album.

Ive seen DM and NO live. DM are much better. Dave and Martin sing better, and while there are mistakes, generally all the synth parts are played correctly.

I dont really care if Dm have a gay image. Thats stupid and childish to dislike a band cause of thier dress. Its the music that counts. DM have produced a lot of very moving and lovely songs. By the way, all the members of DM are married and have 3 kids, so they arent gay (though Martin Gore may have been bi back in the day).

In terms of live, DM these days have more integrity than NO. They play most of thier synth parts live, as opposed to Phil, who mimes his synth parts or playes wanky guitar while the synth is on a backing track. DM also use a live drummer, but he is no Steven Morris. :) But DM to play a lot of thier electronics live, as opposed to NO, who put most of them on a hard drive.

Dont get me wrong. I love New Order. They are one of my all time favorite bands, they have changed the world of music. And the Chicago NO show was amazing.

But Phil really should be playing his synth parts live. Not the sequenced parts, the melodies that you can play with your hands.

I will close by mentioning that Violator by DM and Technique by New Order are my two favorite electro-dance albums.

0 likes

Well as I said before, if he does wave his hands over a keyboard while a machine plays it. Fuck him, he's a cock, and total scum.

But I got no problem with the machine playing....unlike DM who are scared of their tech live, always have been. Tapes are a new thing for NO, DM have always used them.

Oh, yer right bout black celebration, it's the only DM stuff I didn't grow out of ( that's not a dig at anyone, people grow out of all sorts of music). "New Dress" is one of the wisest songs ever written (as is blasphemous rumours now I come to think of it)....even more so now than ever...."hey don't worry about all those dead people.....some slut's tit fell out at the ball game"

0 likes

Unfortunately, DM have that plank Andrew Fletcher in the group who does absolutely nothing at all - That waster has to be worse than Phil.

It's also funny the way some comments lament DM have a gay image, but stoically announce they are still fans. What is wrong with having a gay image in a pop band? When I first heard New Order I was sure at least one of them were gay (and I always hoped it was Gillian...) Gay is okay :thumb:

0 likes

Steve,

Sure. People grow out of things. In High School DM and Public Image Limited were my favorite bands, with New Order being 4th behind the Cure...

But now I am older and I listen to New Order more than DM. A lot more. The music feels more appropriate for where I am now.

Black Celebration is a masterpiece, Ill go so far as to say that BC and Music for the Masses are better than Low Life and Brotherhood. I love the song New Dress as well...

But for me, New Order and DM are the masters of electro rock, and they are more important than Kraftwerk. KW may have started electro, but they didnt move beyond it. NO and DM did.

I think that Technque and Violator are two of the most amazing, emotional,beatiful albums ever made.

Now Steve, you are a techie. What are Phils extra synths for, he didnt have them in America, and he doesnt seem to touch them at the european shows, any idea?

0 likes

The only thing I can think is that some bits are being moved back on to live machines. I suspect YSF had more live elements at southside for instance, made a heck of a noise. If it WAS from the HD recorder, someone was asleep at the wheel.

As for any further detail I dunno, they ARE cabled up with audio and control cables (based a rather fine rear panel shot from hyde or glasto) and no one goes to that trouble just to wind geeks like me up :)

0 likes

Zachery Starkey wrote: Steve,

But for me, New Order and DM are the masters of electro rock, and they are more important than Kraftwerk. KW may have started electro, but they didnt move beyond it. NO and DM did. [end of quote]

Strongly disagree with that statement. How can you say New Order and DM are more important than Kraftwerk?? For me Kraftwerk are the PARENTS of all electronic music and have created timeless masterpieces that have no boundaries. From an electronic perspective, the likes of New Order (good as they are), DM and Daft Punk are amateurs when compared with Kraftwerk.

0 likes

even krawftwerk were old hat in a way. There's always someone earlier (unless you're Leon Theremin (I eaglerly await someone swatting me down on that one, honestly) ) who was the inspiration for Dr Moog (incidentally Moog is of Hungarian origin....many rational scientists believe Hungarians to be Martians....honestly, please, if you do not believe me, google "hungarians are martians"....because of te STUNNINGLY high incidence of genius among them, among other strange traits).

What NO can take credit for (that DM cannot) is being part of the process that turned kraftwerk INTO Daft Punk if you see what I mean.

BTW, Daft Punk are in the same league as Leftfield and underworld and Fatbotslim....all really good till they got loads of money and discovered the peruvian marching powder....then puked out endless repeating filtered loop BILGE! Compare Underworld's first album, a swirling glory of what can be achived with electronics and creativity, with their second....a bunch of songs made from 1 bar filtered loops with droning Dalek-vocals....YAWN.

At least KW, NO AND DM managed to avoid that (notwithstanding that DM have had their problems, and New Order just ARE a drug problem :) )

0 likes

Kraftwerk: without doubt the fathers of modern synth-based musics. If you think that Joy Divison/New Order have been highly influential, it rates as second to the doyens of Dusseldorf, partly because Kraftwerk themselves were huge influences on Joy Division.

Indeed, JD would often listen to the classic KW trilogy of Radioactivity, Trans-Europe Express and The Man Machine during breaks in rehearsal or at each other's homes. If you had to spell out three bands who had the biggest effect on Joy Division, it would be the Velvets, Kraftwerk and the Pistols. Add some Moroder and even Sinatra to that and you've a strange but influential brew.

Interesting contrast between Depeche and Erasure: Vince Clarke formed Depeche with Martin Gore as a guitar-based trio, only dropping them to become synth-based after a year or so. Nearly all the lines on Speak and Spell were played manually, even live. After Vince left, they continued as a trio and a fair bit went onto tape live. They expanded to a quartet with Alan Wilder but most of the basslines, drums and some sequences remained on tape.

Depeche eventually used a drummer whereas Erasure never have and they've never used tapes either, everything being either on sequencers or played live. In fact Clarke has never worked with a human drummer in over a quarter of a century!

Precision time-keeping: Steve Morris is a great drummer. Not only is he super-tight (and was even before he began using machines) but possesses a great technique and ability. He's a very creative drummer too, and should they ever decide to write something outside of the normal 4/4 time sig, I know he'd excel with it too.

The other poster is right about Gillian sorting the 5/4 thing: knowing your gear intimately means you know how to sort problems should they occur. That's something I admired about Gillian: she was as cool as a cucumber live which must have been difficult sometimes when the gear was acting up (witness G-Mex in 88 when the Emulator 2 sequencer had some probs...it was 50/50 whether it would play the sequences for Fine Time, the encore).

Something similar happened to Erasure live once: Clarke used a BBC computer sequencer in those days (late eighties) and it stopped dead in the middle of a song live. Fortunately he was playing a rhythm guitar part and kept them in time for the rest of the song with not a beat dropped anywhere. He sorted it during the break in a few moments and Andy Bell had a rare dig at Vince's former mates by saying they never use tapes live!

Ps tapes imply that you will play the same songs in the same order at every gig which can be restricting.

0 likes

I've never really liked Vince Clarke's music, well liked different bits at different times and drifted away again. However, i've always like Vince for a number of reasons...

  1. To this day he's the only person I ever heard introduce each of his machines and give them a wee solo like other bands do with their carbon based members.
  2. He wrote some of the most detailed things i ever read about Fairlights...AND let the publisher take pictures of his manual.
  3. When he admitted that his neglegence caused the unfortunate death by drowning of said Fairlight.....oh if you'd seen his wee face, bless him.....he knew he'd done something on a par with shooting a unicorn or harpooning a mermaid.

All these are now offset against my newly learned reason to hate him.....he avoided proxymity to drummers for 25 yeas...JAMMY BASTARD!

And Andy Bell, well he said it better than anyone on this thread in that dig about tapes.....you plays your machines you takes your abuse on stage, you plays tapes, you take it in the next life :)

Not sure BTW Chemical that the "same order" thing applies with an HD recorder. But certainly I remember when depeche had a revox on stage with em with all the drums and it did just roll from start to end ( assume it must also have had MTC striped on it to engage the sequencers on the EII's and Emaxes (surely that's Emaxen :) )

As for Gillian's coolness....dude.....you need to see me playing to like 100 people in a dark corner in a club....I end up half naked by end of first track, and by the end of the gig I'm standing in a lake ( and I wonder why being "the band" never gets me laid LOL). Gillian is, in my opinion, an alien, potentially a TimeLady....serisouly, watch any shot of Gills changin songs or getting down and dirty on the front panels, and tell me you're not reminded of The Doctor diving round the TARDIS console(only calmer). :) My Gillian moment is the TPK vid, where just as she finishes her amazing front panel voyetra mixing, as she's about to turn away she pauses for about 50ms and flashes this look at them, ever so subtle, but it just says "these are my children, with whom I am well pleased".

EDIT: meant to say....this thing about staying in time when the machines drop out.....it's a severly rare talent, most musicians go to bits even in a band when they lose the groove. The last big Jazz band I played in was at college, 15 piece bunch who played Jazz standards, except that we were all freaks in one way or another, so it ended up sounding like gong and even hawkwind rather than dizzy gillespie. But we divided the band into Rhythm section (me, drummer and one guitar) and remedials (winds, other guitars, keys). And if the rhythm section dropped out for more than 2 bars.....good night Irene, the remedials were all over the place.....it got so bad that sometimes the drummer would destroy the mood by tramping on his hi hat thru the quiet bits....although we eventually worked out it was better for me to make deadend root-note-thumps as it was far less audible. I mean that's bad....and that's with an entirely carbon based band. Introduce silicon members, and it gets far wronger. The number of really good drummers I know who cannot play to a drum machine is terrifying. They always go into drummer mode, get into a groove and just wander off the machine until they are totally out....THEN accuse the quartz timed beatbox of drifting off the vodka timed drummer. The trick, if anyone cares, is to pretend to be doing some emergency cabling mid gig....but actually unbolt the kick drum pedal (not just the beater...th whoel pedal) and fire the fucker into the crowd or out a window.....no bass drum...no groove....no groove......brain still functioning :)

0 likes

Steve Campbell wrote: even krawftwerk were old hat in a way. There's always someone earlier (unless you're Leon Theremin (I eaglerly await someone swatting me down on that one, honestly) ) who was the inspiration for Dr Moog (incidentally Moog is of Hungarian origin....many rational scientists believe Hungarians to be Martians....honestly, please, if you do not believe me, google "hungarians are martians"....because of te STUNNINGLY high incidence of genius among them, among other strange traits).

What NO can take credit for (that DM cannot) is being part of the process that turned kraftwerk INTO Daft Punk if you see what I mean.

BTW, Daft Punk are in the same league as Leftfield and underworld and Fatbotslim....all really good till they got loads of money and discovered the peruvian marching powder....then puked out endless repeating filtered loop BILGE! Compare Underworld's first album, a swirling glory of what can be achived with electronics and creativity, with their second....a bunch of songs made from 1 bar filtered loops with droning Dalek-vocals....YAWN.

At least KW, NO AND DM managed to avoid that (notwithstanding that DM have had their problems, and New Order just ARE a drug problem :) )

For Underworld's 'first' album I assume you mean Dubnobass.... . A pedantic note, but it was their third. I can't remember the title of the first, but the second was 'Change The Weather' (1989, I think).

0 likes

Hey....I'm always first in line at any pedant's revolt. I've heard tell of those, but thought they were boots (not that that makes them any less of an album of course).

Anyway, do they hold with the pre/post nose-candy hypothesis?

in that, they're great albums cos they were skint.

I should say I really liked underworld til I seen them on the same bill as Bjork.....even tho Bjork was on first and had the quieter end of the night, her dull session muso band blew underworld to DUST. Their set was uninspred, lazily constructed ( all the songs even Born Slippy) used the same 2 drum parts. Except rez/cowgril...there was a big stop and relod before that. Just shows that havin your machines live is no garauntee you wont suck balls :)

0 likes

I am most grateful to the indeed comprehensive given by the right honourable member to the post I posted some moments ago!

Not sure BTW Chemical that the "same order" thing applies with an HD recorder. But certainly I remember when depeche had a revox on stage with em with all the drums and it did just roll from start to end ( assume it must also have had MTX striped on it to engage the sequencers on the EII's and Emaxes (surely that's Emaxen )

Could've been either MIDI timecode or SMPTE but you are therefore reliant on the thing running perfectly smoothly as everything is locked too it. Gulp!

I had to smile about Mr Clarke's Fairlight dying a watery death. How did that happen? He apparently toyed with the heretical idea of giving up music completely after Yazoo wound up and I can see that his pet instrument dying a death would've been traumatic. I saw Erasure on the Tiny Tour (96) when he had them all piled up about fiften foot tall and would scale the rig to adjust a knob or whatever!

The man's a consumate genius, especially for not employing drummers at any time.

As for the delectable Gillian, she had this really feminine grace behind her keys (and when she played guitar) that's difficult to articulate properly. Mostly she'd keep her head down whilst Barn was busy telling everyone they were cunts or something and Hooky was giving it loads. I recall Wembley in 87 when she was the only member not to remove her shirt as time went on, although I feel that, had she done so, a riot may have ensued!

She just limited herself to the odd shy smile during some sort of on-stage high jinks and never seemed flustered by anything going out of tune, failing to load, breaking down etc. She's missed and that's a fact.:bow2:

0 likes

I'd totally forgotten I'd started this thread..uh..thanks for bringing it back to life...

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗