Skip to content

STEVEN AND PHIL INTERVIEW

Archived

9 replies · 527 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Apologies to all if this has been posted before but I just came across this interview today... (and no I did not find it by doing a Google search for "80's revival").

New Order By Stephen Fortner | September 05

Do a Google search for “80s revival” and the sheer number of results is evidence enough that one is indeed underway. Musically, the style being revived isn’t the studio-production extravagance of Madonna or Toto. It’s all about New Wave, a term that’s been applied to so many bands since it was new that some confusion is natural. Initially a British phenomenon, it was either an evolution of punk or a move away from it, depending on who you ask. Production values, not to mention hair and makeup, were proudly slicker. In particular, keyboards provided bass lines, pads, and counterpoints to guitar, something unheard-of in punk. But the raw energy, sense of rebellion, and sometimes dark and emotional themes remained, albeit with a temper that was more brood and less brawl. With their hard rocking sound infiltrated by pulsing synths, mod heroes like The Bravery and The Killers can be seen as heading up a similar response to grunge and “alternative,” but all the music-mag genre-babble in the world pales compared to a good listen back at the source.

Even better is when the source kicks in the door and shows you how it’s done. Case in point: Waiting for the Sirens’ Call (Warner/Reprise), the new studio release from New Order, which is soon to be joined by Item, a career-spanning 2-DVD set. This band knows a thing or two about staying power: Originally Joy Division, the most seminal post-punk group in the world and a major reason we still talk about the “Manchester sound,” they reformed as New Order in 1980 after the suicide of mercurial frontman Ian Curtis. Bandmate Bernard Sumner became the face and voice, and still heads the current lineup along with founders Peter Hook on bass and Stephen Morris on drums. Though longtime keyboardist Gillian Gilbert is absent, Morris shares keyboard duties with relative newcomer Phil Cunningham. From the pumping, classics-evoking straight-eighth synth bass on “Krafty” to the pop gem “Jetstream,” graced by the guest vocals of Scissor Sisters chanteuse Ana Matronic (see Keyboard, Feb. ’05), Sirens finds the icons in top form.

We caught a quick chat with Phil and Stephen in the frenetic green room of Jimmy Kimmel Live in Hollywood, where New Order rocked the bandstand for a good half an hour after cameras stopped rolling, delighting the studio audience and vexing TV execs (easy to spot by their unique failure to dance). Before the interview, the Order’s publicist surprised us by confiding they were “actually a little nervous” appearing in Keyboard. “I think they have the idea you need to be Yes or Chick Corea,” he said. As if blazing a trail for the synthesizer’s acceptance in danceable rock isn’t enough.

Tell me about the songwriting process on Sirens. Is there a story about getting a song together that stands out? Stephen Morris: There’s no one way we do it . . . you’d be just amazed at how many little bits of stuff there are that anyone comes up with, then we try to glue them together. Sometimes, Hooky [Peter Hook] will add a melody to it that works. Bernard usually takes it in the clearest direction, takes it home and adds electronics and other tracks there. That’s probably why a lot of our songs have that hybrid quality.

You mean that perfect balance between guitars and synths? SM: If you say so. [Laughs.] But then, we sometimes get together, sit down, and commit to writing a song from scratch. Phil Cunningham: Sometimes it just gels and it’s wonderful; others it’s a bitch to get anything happening. “Jetstream,” which we’re really happy with, of course, took a lot of time, for example.

So how did you each come up with those little bits? SM: We all used [Propellerhead] Reason on our laptops quite a bit, and Phil and I tend to like [Steinberg] Cubase VST for writing. Gone it is, though, and one must change with the times, so we’ve only just moved to SX. PC: We also used [Steinberg] The Grand when we needed piano simulation.

Is that what’s in the piano intro on the new song “Dracula’s Castle”? SM: Actually that’s the real thing . . . if you listen closely you can hear the stool creaking! PC: It’s the creaking that was a plug-in. “Steinberg Stool,” in fact. [Everyone laughs.]

How about some of the more textural stuff, as well as the staccato, rhythmic synth parts you’re so well known for? They all sound very analog. SM: For the studio sessions, we bought some Doepfer modules — just a couple of oscillators and filters. Then we went back and got some more . . . . PC: . . . and then some more. Modular synths have a way of doing that to you.

How about those beautiful, Mellotron-like strings on the title track? SM: I believe [Pauses.] that was the [GForce] M-Tron plug-in.

Without someone exclusively on the keyboards live, how do you handle synth-heavy tunes, say, the classics “Blue Monday” or “Bizarre Love Triangle”? SM: Whatever we developed the sounds on, we tend to go back to the [Roland] XV-5080s live, because they’re reliable, easy to use, and you can get a rental just about anywhere, so we copy things over to them as samples and play them from the XP-80s we have onstage. PC: I’m not sure why we have that particular keyboard, but we do. Two are downstage, one by Bernard and one by my station over at the right. They’re older, but very solid. SM: I have a combination of acoustic and electronic drums, as well. On songs like those, I also have some of the drum parts programmed so I can stand up and play my Kurzweils. There’s a K2500 and K2000 on a stand next to my kit.

Those two songs are perhaps the most “electro” or “synth pop” songs in your repertoire and the ones casual listeners know you by. The Sirens tech aesthetic is more subtle, but undeniable. You even have a lyric that goes “You had a brilliant future / writing songs on your computer.” Any comment on how things have changed since the ’80s, and whether it’s made your creative process easier or harder? SM: When we did “Bizarre Love Triangle,” we hired a Fairlight, I remember. The most expensive, prestigious keyboard you could own at the time, and nowadays, you can barely give them away, right? It was very finicky, but all we had otherwise was a [Oberheim] DMX drum machine, the [Sequential] Prophet-5, and the Poly Sequencer that went with it. Trying to program the Poly Sequencer was like tapping Morse code. All of it was unreliable, but considered expensive and state-of-the-art. It was also very primitive by today’s standards, but far more complicated to use. You could certainly do a lot with it, but creatively, you had to approach it with a really developed idea of what you wanted song-wise.

It’s not like sitting down at that setup would be what inspired you to create. PC: Right. Nowadays, something like Reason is just the opposite. It’s so simple almost anyone can write a song on the plane or wherever. SM: The technology has finally caught up to what we’ve always wanted. It actually helped us end up with maybe twice as many good songs as we needed for this record.

So we won’t have to wait as long for another record, then?

“Five minutes to airtime,” shouts a stage manager to no one in particular. Saved by the bell, Phil and Stephen grin slyly at me. A visit to www.neworderonline.com, an unofficial but thorough fan site, shows a blank CD image with a 2006 release date and the not-so-cryptic note: “7 tracks ready.”

0 likes

That last paragraph looks interesting. :) Cheers for the read.

0 likes

Interesting read. Thanks for posting!

0 likes

A good read, well found. It's unusual to get steve and phil together, normally hooky and steve or barney and phil, perhaps he has it in his contract now to be in every interview so that people except him as a band member, must be the first interview where he's not discribed as the new member, por bugger, a lot to live up to.

Interesting to find they use reason to write on now, I find it quite limiting, but my set up is shite.

I always dreamt of a fairlight as a teenager, you could buy a bloody big house for the price of one of them.

0 likes

Jed Stephens wrote: A good read, well found. It's unusual to get steve and phil together, normally hooky and steve or barney and phil, perhaps he has it in his contract now to be in every interview so that people except him as a band member, must be the first interview where he's not discribed as the new member, por bugger, a lot to live up to.

Yeah, 'relative newcomer Phil Cunningham' is far better

I love the 'Steinberg stool plug-in' bit:D

0 likes

Jed Stephens wrote: A good read, well found. It's unusual to get steve and phil together, normally hooky and steve or barney and phil, perhaps he has it in his contract now to be in every interview so that people except him as a band member, must be the first interview where he's not discribed as the new member, por bugger, a lot to live up to.

Interesting to find they use reason to write on now, I find it quite limiting, but my set up is shite.

I always dreamt of a fairlight as a teenager, you could buy a bloody big house for the price of one of them.

I think a fair few of us did. Even an EII would have been nice. Just think if Hannett got HIS Fairlight instead of Rob over-riding Wilson and Hannett about the Hacienda, how different Movement might have ended up.

0 likes

I guess this also explains why Bizarre Love Triangle never sounds quite "right" live.

I've always thought that the live BLT sounded a bit "karaoke"/cover band-esque during certain sections of the song.

Perhaps they'd better break out the origonal Fairlight sounds which IMHO sounded much better than the Roland sounds they're using now.

On a separate note (no pun intended) you can see how Ministry treated their incredibly expensive Fairlight on the link below.

http://musicthing.blogspot.com/2005/07/ebay-of-day-2-ministrys-old-fairlights.html

0 likes

nice one for that :thumb:

0 likes

This is a really interesting interview, especialyl as it gave some insight into how the song writing process for WFTSC was.

I was surprised to see Phil talka bout keyboards. I would imagine he wouldnt know much about synths, given than he seems to enjoy playing guitar a lot more than keyboards during concerts. (Yes I know I mention this in every post, it just annoys me. NO have a great guitarist in Barney, they need a good synth player to fill them out, not another guitar).

I wonder if Phil played keyboards on the WFTSC album at all...I imagined that Barney played all the keyboards, and that he and Steve did the programming.

Does anyone know where I can find online the February 2005 Keyboard Magazine interview with New Order? I think they talk about the making of Jetstream or something....

0 likes

I checked the keyboardmag.com website and this is the only New Order interview they have (September 2005)...

I'd be surprised (plesantly) if they did more than one New Order interview per year...

Maybe this is the interview you were thinking of or perhaps it's a different magazine than Keyboard.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗