Skip to content

Community Winners

Archived

103 replies · 2,659 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Steve Campbell wrote: If I were Spotty or wenn I'd be sitting there RIGHT now looking at a dialogue saying "are you sure you want to delte the folder C2 and all it's contents"

DO IT!!!

That would be so punk.

Disclaimer: Yes, I'm serious, and no, it's not out of disrespect or any doubt about the quality of the finalists. It's really just a reflection on the ratio of the work the producers have put in to the fun had. Music should not be a goddamn job (unless you're raking it in). And, speaking from experience, wiping tracks is very therapeutic.

And personal to Bob: I would so love to hear more Acoustic Division. Your recordings both sound like live takes to a single mic -- which I respect, but it would be so much fun to take your exquisite guitar playing and your daughter's voice and really mix them properly, add some reverb, etc. I'm thrilled at the releationship you have with your daughter and hope you always (1) encourage her and (2) keep her away from that Charlotte Church ... she's trouble.

0 likes

I agree with Clayhead and Tim on this, seems to be the use (or perceived misuse) of the word "Community" that is causing all the kerfuffle here.

What should it have been called?

0 likes

(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote: What a kerfuffle!!! Perhaps the next one should be called "I'm So Grateful That I'd Like to Run My Tongue Along the Throbbing Shaft of Steve Campbell's Cock"??

Or maybe "Commode"????

And Tim Jauncey should be BANNED FOREVER for not liking "Ultraviolence". It's a right toe-tapper, after all!!!!

:crazy:

Dunno what they put in the water in Stoke (well actually I do, it makes it salty), but Ultraviolence is one of my favourite NO songs, which is why we covered it! It's our version that doesn't really cut it, there's not enough vibrancy and bounce to it. That's what I think anyway, and dozens of you obviously agreed!

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote:

DC wrote: I think the reason people are taking issue with you Al, is that you claim not to give a fuck about the whole thing apart from supporting your mates (fair enough approach), but seem to think that it would be better if everyone approached Community in the same way as you. Why should they?

If we're gonna have a Community offering then I personally think it should at least be representative of this Community.

Community isn't. It's as relevant to me personally as any other cover versions which have come before, whether that be Paul Young's LWTUA or Moby's Temptation. They're just covers done by people I don't know and I have no connection with.

OK. Your position is clear. But you're really saying that the rules should have been different. That's a reasonable discussion to have before the event, but pretty pointless after.

0 likes

[brown]Ally[/brown] wrote: I agree with Clayhead and Tim on this, seems to be the use (or perceived misuse) of the word "Community" that is causing all the kerfuffle here.

What should it have been called?

Probably "The Shed".

For fuck's fucking sake!

0 likes

Craig W wrote: To make it more 'Communal'; maybe next time limit entries to the 1st 20 NOOL members who enter who have also made at least 1,000 posts.

Again, that's probably too extreme as well.

At the end of the day there shouldn't be any pre-requisites whatsoever for a project like this. ANYONE at all should be able to enter this, whether they postly regularly, or have never even visited the site.

My initial issue, if we go back to page one, is that the people on the final cut didn't seem representative of the folks on this site. And I was disappointed for people who've genuinely made an effort here over the years (not just by posting but gigging, like Digital and Re-Order) not making the grade.

Still, didn't the girl with her top off win this?! I didn't listen to their offering. Was it really that good?!

0 likes

(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote: What a kerfuffle!!! Perhaps the next one should be called "I'm So Grateful That I'd Like to Run My Tongue Along the Throbbing Shaft of Steve Campbell's Cock"??

Sounds awesome, but I'm afraid you'd have trouble filling up a 12-incher with that one.

0 likes

I think Dr Fradley is developing a severely unhealthy fascination with my undercarriage.

Gnu is right delete the lot, it's the punk thinkg to do ;)

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote:

Still, didn't the girl with her top off win this?! I didn't listen to their offering. Was it really that good?!

Yes, and yes it was good, but there isn't a lot being hidden by those strategically placed arms, look how close they are together!

0 likes

Steve Campbell wrote: I think Dr Fradley is developing a severely unhealthy fascination with my undercarriage.

Gnu is right delete the lot, it's the punk thinkg to do ;)

Unhealthy?????? If it feels good, do it Steve-O!!!!

:blush:

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote:

Still, didn't the girl with her top off win this?! I didn't listen to their offering. Was it really that good?!

Yeah not half bad actually. I dare say she raked in a few tit votes from the local letchers, but it's a very very good track.

0 likes

DC wrote:

Al Jarvis wrote:

DC wrote: I think the reason people are taking issue with you Al, is that you claim not to give a fuck about the whole thing apart from supporting your mates (fair enough approach), but seem to think that it would be better if everyone approached Community in the same way as you. Why should they?

If we're gonna have a Community offering then I personally think it should at least be representative of this Community.

Community isn't. It's as relevant to me personally as any other cover versions which have come before, whether that be Paul Young's LWTUA or Moby's Temptation. They're just covers done by people I don't know and I have no connection with.

OK. Your position is clear. But you're really saying that the rules should have been different. That's a reasonable discussion to have before the event, but pretty pointless after.

But we did have this discussion before, after the first Community became a similar source of dissatisfaction, and we were led to believe by the organisers that this would not be the case this time, that only existing members would be eligible to participate. That got forgotten by the organisers when the competition began (despite protests), instead they decided that you had to be a member before x day to vote, something of a cop-out. As it happened, well over half the contestants joined the site specifically to participate!

0 likes

DC wrote: OK. Your position is clear. But you're really saying that the rules should have been different. That's a reasonable discussion to have before the event, but pretty pointless after.

Indeed, I've just posted as such, DC before reading your response. I just don't see this as representative of the people who post here. Representative of their tastes maybe but not of the people. And the original pre-requisite of this project was that you HAD to be a poster here. But I don't think that needed to be the case. Why not just open it up to all-comers?

Either way, I simply have no interest in cover versions.

But I would've still voted for those I know! :uhoh:

Just like I'd sponsor a mate doing a charity run, whether I have no interest in the charity in question, or not.

0 likes

(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote: Unhealthy?????? If it feels good, do it Steve-O!!!!

:blush:

if I could do that to myself, I'd never post again....ah right,see yer point.

0 likes

oldmonkey wrote:

Al Jarvis wrote:

Still, didn't the girl with her top off win this?! I didn't listen to their offering. Was it really that good?!

Yes, and yes it was good, but there isn't a lot being hidden by those strategically placed arms, look how close they are together!

Indeedy... obviously I didn't hear it, but maybe people were actually voting for 'NOOL's Next Top Model' (TM).

0 likes

(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote: If this was done in the true spirit of the band and the pre-gig meet-ups (frankly, the only time there's ever a genuine sense of 'community'), the finalists would have been chosen via a drinking competition: all day on the Stella, the last people to pass out get to appear on the eventual CD.

More democratic, more fun, and infinitely healthier (in a social sense, at least) than tippety-tapping away at your wee keyboards in varying degrees of righteous rage.

:nod:

Nice, fun point there. But the true spirit of those gig meets has been captured many times - and those cds get copied many many times and cherished by all of us.

And getting on it is easy - just look for the man with the mic and push your way over to him. There's no democracy down at the front - it's mob rule all the way!

We even had a DVD out last year (one of my most treasured possessions).

0 likes

Craig W wrote:

oldmonkey wrote:

Al Jarvis wrote:

Still, didn't the girl with her top off win this?! I didn't listen to their offering. Was it really that good?!

Yes, and yes it was good, but there isn't a lot being hidden by those strategically placed arms, look how close they are together!

Indeedy... obviously I didn't hear it, but maybe people were actually voting for 'NOOL's Next Top Model' (TM).

The song is cracking, and she's got a gorgeous voice, but it was a surefire winner putting a topless bird on the promo photo!

0 likes

I was going to send in a topless photo with my entry, but I was afraid that would have been flat out unfair; besides, I wanted the focus to be on my music, not my hotness.

I'm too sexy for this comp. Too sexy for this comp.

0 likes

Al Jarvis wrote:

Craig W wrote: To make it more 'Communal'; maybe next time limit entries to the 1st 20 NOOL members who enter who have also made at least 1,000 posts.

Again, that's probably too extreme as well.

At the end of the day there shouldn't be any pre-requisites whatsoever for a project like this. ANYONE at all should be able to enter this, whether they postly regularly, or have never even visited the site.

My initial issue, if we go back to page one, is that the people on the final cut didn't seem representative of the folks on this site. And I was disappointed for people who've genuinely made an effort here over the years (not just by posting but gigging, like Digital and Re-Order) not making the grade.

Still, didn't the girl with her top off win this?! I didn't listen to their offering. Was it really that good?!

My thoughts as well.

I must say, I did actually listen to a few songs, just at random, and didnt really think much of them. If i want to listen to New Order songs, I'll listen to New Order. Well, adn Re: Order, but i have to be very pissed for that.

0 likes

2 things

Any links to the boobies?

Am I too early to ask if I'm too late to enter the sleeve contest yet?

0 likes

Hank Wiseass© wrote: 2 things

Any links to the boobies?

Am I too early to ask if I'm too late to enter the sleeve contest yet?

1 http://www.booble.com 2 Check the Community 2 forum ya lazy get.

Can't believe how much this thread has been blown out of all proportion masel. Everyone's entitled to choose however they wish to vote.

I myself listened to all the songs (or at least long snippets of the songs) I wanted to make sure that the best of the songs were on the album. I didnae do bad I picked 7 of the 10.

And why the fuck were the Vikings brought into this? It seems too many fuck-wits are quick to shout Vikings and blame us for everything. Viking 2.5 CD? - Yeah right :nuts:

0 likes

Steve Campbell wrote:

Now, ALL of you, have a fucking Jelly baby and shut the fuck up.

Thats exactly what I'm doing now - tesco jelly babies - 250gm pack only €0.75:clap: :clap:

BTW - my opinion - the community voted, so the result IS representative - of what we LIKE, not what we have made ourselves.

Also, Acustic Division - i voted for both your tracks - really like the mellow feel your style (bet you didn;t think you had a style!) lends to these tracks. Stick around, post a bit, its actually a lot of fun here most of the time:thumb:

0 likes

Shug wrote:

Hank Wiseass© wrote:

2 Check the Community 2 forum ya lazy get.

I read them, it looked too much like hard work. :\ohwell:

0 likes

Uncle Liam wrote:

Al Jarvis wrote:

Craig W wrote: To make it more 'Communal'; maybe next time limit entries to the 1st 20 NOOL members who enter who have also made at least 1,000 posts.

Again, that's probably too extreme as well.

At the end of the day there shouldn't be any pre-requisites whatsoever for a project like this. ANYONE at all should be able to enter this, whether they postly regularly, or have never even visited the site.

My initial issue, if we go back to page one, is that the people on the final cut didn't seem representative of the folks on this site. And I was disappointed for people who've genuinely made an effort here over the years (not just by posting but gigging, like Digital and Re-Order) not making the grade.

Still, didn't the girl with her top off win this?! I didn't listen to their offering. Was it really that good?!

My thoughts as well.

I must say, I did actually listen to a few songs, just at random, and didnt really think much of them. If i want to listen to New Order songs, I'll listen to New Order. Well, adn Re: Order, but i have to be very pissed for that.

no liam, what you have to be very pissed for is : nicking setlists and launching yourself at the stage, not realising there is a height difference between the floor and stage, then falling over the monitors, flattening the mic stand and then singing almost unintelligibly along to a line and a half before retreating to the shadows of near obscurity. I have audio evidence if you'd like a copy...

0 likes

Thats not very pissed... thats completely slaughtered!

Anyway, wasnt it Jarvo who nicked the set list?

0 likes

granted, this last time. then you took it off him. but I've got video evidence of you nicking the one from the gig before. we've learned our lesson now and all our setlists are encrypted and bolted down. we'll say nothing of disappearing riders....

0 likes

Were you really going to drink that Orange Stuff? :D

0 likes

Facsimile wrote: granted, this last time. then you took it off him. but I've got video evidence of you nicking the one from the gig before. we've learned our lesson now and all our setlists are encrypted and bolted down. we'll say nothing of disappearing riders....

/me writes 12 gauge shotgun and elephant ammo into the tech rider.

0 likes

Facsimile wrote: granted, this last time. then you took it off him.

Nope, I've defo still got it.

Looked good too, shame I can't remember any of it?! :uhoh:

0 likes

Look, the votes show what the majority feels are the best tracks. I don't agree with some, and I'm blown away that Labster didn't get EITHER of his amazing tracks on the CD (along with Horse In Retirement and Republicans). But the final product is what the majority of us wanted. The ones sitting here bickering are hardly that. Just deal with it. Buy the CD or don't; it's your call.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗