Thats too far, if i stuck a big erect penis up or an black person being hung they'd be fookin hell on.
SORT IT OUT
Dates
· UTC
Moderators - ban that 'fanny' avatar picture
Archived53 replies · 3,583 views
This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.
Well, since the only person that can ban anybody is on vacation, it might be a few days...
but we have already discussed it...a little bit...
in the mean time, if you find it "THAT" offensive, you could always turn the display of avys off until Nicos gets back....
Andrew Sayer wrote: Thats too far, if i stuck a big erect penis up or an black person being hung they'd be fookin hell on. SORT IT OUT
hear, hear.
it also looks a little bit uncomfortable, all that rooting around.
I was going to say the same myself yesterday but my pc crashed. It evidently does not like porn.
Who is the user? I suspect somebody who's already on here...
It is. They admitted as such.
Because its a real big and brace man to hide behind a second user name...
IN North America we call those ugly waist-pouches 'fanny-packs'. Do Brits just crack up over this or what? Like hearing, 'hold on, my camera's in my pussy-pack'?
FtotheDoubleOff wrote: IN North America we call those ugly waist-pouches 'fanny-packs'. Do Brits just crack up over this or what? Like hearing, 'hold on, my camera's in my pussy-pack'?
In the UK, we call those ugly below-the-waist-pouches 'vaginas'. Only very vaguely prettier than the male equivalent - the 'last-turkey-in-the-shop' look.
They both have a function but aren't in the least bit attractive.
It's childish and very unnecessary.
I bet it's Russell Brand or Jonathan Ross.
They're always creating mischief, the cheeky scamps! 
I demand their resignations!
Completely out of place here 
FtotheDoubleOff wrote: IN North America we call those ugly waist-pouches 'fanny-packs'. Do Brits just crack up over this or what? Like hearing, 'hold on, my camera's in my pussy-pack'?
The use of the word "fanny" got John McEnroe in a bit of trouble, all he said was wibledon could do with more fannys on seats, the brit co presenters nearly choked, I love the fact that some words have different meaning, but we both still call it english.
as for the avatar picture, it doesn't offend me, but I understand that it would others and is therefore unacceptable.
again, the only person capable of banning is Nic and he's on vacation. a private message has been sent to this user asking him to remove his avatar picture. unfortunately we moderators can't do much more than this right now 
almansoglasnost wrote: again, the only person capable of banning is Nic and he's on vacation. a private message has been sent to this user asking him to remove his avatar picture. unfortunately we moderators can't do much more than this right now
You can't carpet bomb his home town?
What use are you then?
:D
If anything you've seen in Doctor's posts today has affected you, please log on to our website. The address is appearing on your screen now.
As well as some advice that you may find helpful, you can also log on to our forum and chat to other people who are finding Doctor's posts difficult to deal with.
Other Doctor helpline websites are available.
Terms and conditions apply.
I've never seen any avatars, have them switched off as a matter of course as they delay pages loading. That said, if there's an offensive one up at the moment then it should be removed, we've a few precedents after all.
It's a shot of some lass's split beaver. I mean, how much misogyny does there have to be round here for people to be "offended"?? It's the 21st Century and there's a black fella in the White House. FFS.
Plus, there's a thread elsewhere with a piccy of a guy with a boner. All's fair and equal, no?
It's a matter of appropriacy Martin. If this was a 'porn' forum, then fair enough.
However, this place is being bandied around as the 'Official' site and as such, reflects pretty poorly on the band and their associated projects nowadays, not to mention the members here - whether that's tacky or 'adult' avatars or the infantile bickering and gratuitous pursuit of personal insults in the forum pages.
I really think a 'clean up' is desperately needed if this site is to retain any credibility.
Chris Nash wrote: It's a matter of appropriacy Martin. If this was a 'porn' forum, then fair enough.
However, this place is being bandied around as the 'Official' site and as such, reflects pretty poorly on the band and their associated projects nowadays, not to mention the members here - whether that's tacky or 'adult' avatars or the infantile bickering and gratuitous pursuit of personal insults in the forum pages.
I really think a 'clean up' is desperately needed if this site is to retain any credibility.
Well, maybe. But given that the band themselves have descended into infantile & petty bickering (actually, it's more like a career-long project!) it seems almost apt.
And, from what I've read on here, the recent reissues really needed a "clean up" in places of they were to retain any credibility.
Still, love juice smells like dead fish the last I heard....
PETER COATES'S BELATED REDEMPTION wrote:
Still, love juice smells like dead fish the last I heard....
You've been with/talking to the wrong people then mate. Showers/baths can do wonders! 
Diamond 383 wrote:
37,000 strong, we can't be wrong
Millions of flys eat shite,
they cant all be wrong either...
PETER COATES'S BELATED REDEMPTION wrote:
Still, love juice smells like dead fish the last I heard....
Scampi Fries
