I go back and forth about this. On the one hand, it does seem sad in the same way all those 60s bands grew older and more baldly commercial, like the many iterations of Jefferson Airplane or Laser Floyd at the Hayden Planetarium for those who get my reference. Then again, we're all getting older, Joy Division is long gone and I'd probably go to it if it was stateside. Good or bad, Peter Hook is still pretty interesting playing the bass
Hooky doing Unknown Pleasures Live
Archived111 replies · 6,824 views
Shakin' Baker wrote: Peter Hook is still pretty interesting playing the bass
Yes he is, he is the best on the planet but if he opts to sing lead vocals at these gigs another bass player will be playing a lot of his parts.
If this really needs to happen Hooky is best auditioning all the JD tribute bands, bin off the tribute bass player and hey presto....Hooky and the JD's.
Good point, a lot less interesting if he sings. Maybe he can stand a cardboard cutout of Ian up and pipe the vocals in
Joy Division are not the Beach Boys.
Peter Hook is not Brian Wilson.
That would explain the lack of close harmonies/references to surfing.
Sean Harris and Sam Riley have both just finished Brighton Rock so may be in need of some work.
This is well sad,whos gonna do the vocals,dont say Hooky.Hes taking a piece of musical history and seriously degrading it,all be it for a good cause.Im starting to wonder about Hooky,is he bored or something.I wonder if Bernard and Steve are involved,this seriously stinks
Jonny Donepoindatgunname wrote:
Joy Division are not the Beach Boys.
Peter Hook is not Brian Wilson.
That would explain the lack of close harmonies/references to surfing.
Sardonic. I like it.
It would also explains why Electronic/The Other Two/Revenge/Monaco/BadLoo/Hooky & the Boys/Flogging a Dead Singer/Whatever Abomination Comes Next never made a record that could even piss in the general vicinity of this one.

Pacific ocean blue,, now there a lesson in repackagingand thoughtfully issueing the release, dennis was a realy undervalued member of the beach boys and thats a beautifull collection of songs..
no joy division aint the Beach boys,, so.
Peter hook aint brian wilson,,and..
Were being given the chance to see one man who was involved ,interpretation of this classic debut album,, our Rog sold out many a time playing his take on dark side and the wall( no pun intended),, its beuatifill music,,i once spent an entire two weeks in march 1980 listening to it over and over again,,and will never stop.
A chance to watch,,Admire.....
shedhead wrote: Im starting to wonder about Hooky,is he bored or something.
no, he's a cash-hungry slag. Peter Hooker.
shedhead wrote: This is well sad,whos gonna do the vocals,dont say Hooky.Hes taking a piece of musical history and seriously degrading it,all be it for a good cause.Im starting to wonder about Hooky,is he bored or something.I wonder if Bernard and Steve are involved,this seriously stinks
From the sound of it, it doesn't really seem like Bernard and Steve are invited or involved. And from some of the interviews that I've read of Bernard (especially after last year or so), it seems that whilst Bernard doesn't intend to deny the past, he doesn't seem to want to live in the past or celebrate the past in this sort of manner. That's the impression I'm getting.
this will just further divide them all. i can't see sumner or morris liking this at all.
until the past few years, i couldn't see hooky doing this either.
playing the JD material with the other two living members of Joy Division was one thing.
but this is just some sort of necrophilia.
Peter, I love you, and always will cause i am a JD/NO nutter, but this is going too far. sorry.
Burt Burterson wrote:
shedhead wrote: Im starting to wonder about Hooky,is he bored or something.
no, he's a cash-hungry slag. Peter Hooker.
I think he is worried about the new Hacienda FAC251 making him skint.
"What do you think of Peter Hook’s new nightclub venture, Fac 251, that trades on the history of the Haçienda?
BS: What do I think of his club? Good luck to him you know. Let him do his own thing. [starts to laugh uncontrollably] You know, if that’s what he wants to do, then that’s fine. I don’t mind that at all. Yet it seems an odd thing to do after complaining about all the money he lost from the Haçienda first time round. But good luck to him, yeah."
From the interview posted today.
I hope the backstage brawl they are gonna have when they are both at the same show is put up on Youtube this summer.
Jonny Donepoindatgunname wrote:
Joy Division are not the Beach Boys.
Peter Hook is not Brian Wilson.
That would explain the lack of close harmonies/references to surfing.
Hey, there was "Surf Bass" on Revenge 2.0...
Tarbox23 wrote: I hope the backstage brawl they are gonna have when they are both at the same show is put up on Youtube this summer.
Distributed by Peter Hooks "Hacienda" video.
Tarbox23 wrote: I hope the backstage brawl they are gonna have when they are both at the same show is put up on Youtube this summer.
Maybe it will be like the end of Spinal Tap the movie...
"Do you feel that playing rock 'n' roll music keeps you a child? That is, keeps you in a state of arrested development?"
Could be worse, he could have done Closer.
Let's face it,for years New Order gigs have had a JD karaoke session as part of the set, so he might as well carry on with a new tribute band.
If this is what he want's to do for his mates memory then let him get on with it.
He's always been a cunt so he won't give a fuck anyway. Plus it's got to be better than pretending to DJ !
Karlos wrote: Could be worse, he could have done Closer.
Let's face it,for years New Order gigs have had a JD karaoke session as part of the set, so he might as well carry on with a new tribute band.
If this is what he want's to do for his mates memory then let him get on with it.
He's always been a cunt so he won't give a fuck anyway. Plus it's got to be better than pretending to DJ !
![]()
Karlos wrote: Could be worse, he could have done Closer.
Let's face it,for years New Order gigs have had a JD karaoke session as part of the set, so he might as well carry on with a new tribute band.
If this is what he want's to do for his mates memory then let him get on with it.
He's always been a cunt so he won't give a fuck anyway. Plus it's got to be better than pretending to DJ !
I dunno. I think Closer is superior to Unknown Pleasures in every way.
And its not Karaoke when New Order Plays a Joy Division song. New Order wrote Joy Division songs. Ian just wrote the lyrics. I'd rather hear 3/4ths of Joy Division play JD songs than anyone else.
Yes when you slander their dad you twat
Erdel Kizilkay wrote:
[orange]State of Love and Trust [/orange] wrote:
Erdel Kizilkay wrote: what a fuckin knob
Takes one to know one!
are you a 12 year old girl? do people still say that?
Zachery Starkey wrote: I'd rather hear 3/4ths of Joy Division play JD songs than anyone else.
How about 1/4 of the band playing a complete JD album? Must admit I'm not mad keen on this "Unknown Pleasures Tour" at the moment but I suppose it's up to Hooky how he wants to commemorate his old mate's memory... same goes for Bernard and Steve.
I'm hoping once the 30th anniversary stuff passes the emphasis will shift back onto the "new" with the fast-approaching-mythical-status Freebass EP getting a release. I think most fans are in the mood to hear summit fresh and imagine most wouldn't mind dipping their hands in their pocket to hear it.
Zachery Starkey wrote:
And its not Karaoke when New Order Plays a Joy Division song. New Order wrote Joy Division songs. Ian just wrote the lyrics. I'd rather hear 3/4ths of Joy Division play JD songs than anyone else.
NO and Bloo play over a substantial backing track. Hooky tends to keep it far 'liver'. I don't really give a shit either way, I'll go to as many gigs as I can by either band.
Surface wrote: Yes when you slander their dad you twat
Erdel Kizilkay wrote:
[orange]State of Love and Trust [/orange] wrote:
Erdel Kizilkay wrote: what a fuckin knob
Takes one to know one!
are you a 12 year old girl? do people still say that?
slander? i dont think so. also other people have said things id consider far worse about his dad on this forum. as for twat, well it takes one to etc etc
Lots of people may have a view about what Hooky does and that's fine but calling someones dad over steps the mark in my opinion. BTW I notice that you keep all your details private big man!
Erdel Kizilkay wrote:
Surface wrote: Yes when you slander their dad you twat
Erdel Kizilkay wrote:
[orange]State of Love and Trust [/orange] wrote:
Erdel Kizilkay wrote: what a fuckin knob
Takes one to know one!
are you a 12 year old girl? do people still say that?
slander? i dont think so. also other people have said things id consider far worse about his dad on this forum. as for twat, well it takes one to etc etc
Big man? Firstly i dont know why he would want to come into a forum where he is likely to hear that kind of thing. Secondly i didnt actually know for certain that he was hookys son. Thirdly, even though im not in the habit of being intentionally rude about peoples parents, i dont think a forum should be censored so as not to offend certain people. But im sure he appreciates having you to stick up for him, big man.
Erdel Kizilkay wrote: Big man? Firstly i dont know why he would want to come into a forum where he is likely to hear that kind of thing. Secondly i didnt actually know for certain that he was hookys son. Thirdly, even though im not in the habit of being intentionally rude about peoples parents, i dont think a forum should be censored so as not to offend certain people. But im sure he appreciates having you to stick up for him, big man.
People may have said worse about Peter Hook but I think you were a touch harsh with your comment,Erdel. I totally disagree that by coming onto this forum that his son is likely to hear that kind of thing as it is a forum for New Order & Joy Division fans. Ok, some fans may not be agreeable to some projects that the band members undertake, but in the majority of cases, people are positive. Or why would you come on this forum? Why do you come on here? I think Surface's comments are valid and he is right to confront you for your comment, except for the bit about slander.
Well that's my two penny worth.
And as for the post:
Unknown Pleasures? Why not? He was involved in putting that album together. Why not tour it? Alright, it might creak a bit but I would rather see this than some ropey band of nobodys pretending to be them and making a complete hash of it.....
:bag:
The 30th of Closer is a few months away, so will there be a Closer celebration? Personally I agree that Closer is better, not to put Unknown Pleasures down. 30th for Unknown Pleasures was last year. Why not an overall short term celebration of Joy Division? Just kinda seems like Peter is exploiting the iconic status of Unknown Pleasures and Love Will Tear Us Apart for attention.
Hooky can have some fun and pay respect to his past band. Hell, he should have some fun at the Hacienda. Maybe should stay in the Hacienda. But if this Joy Division homage became a longer term project past a couple of shows, or if they released a CD or DVD of it, and along with the spoken word tour... this could get repulsive and exploitive. I can see why people are upset on the recent chain of events, hopefully things will stay in the tasteful range.
This year kicked off in fine fettle with Other Two revamps, BL gig/single news and The Light boding well for Freebass. Come on Hooky, don't give us another lesson in ancient history!