Skip to content

Could anyone see this happening a few months ago

Archived

40 replies · 2,383 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

EdelBrock wrote: Don't see this going past the charities... as stated before I think its a setup to jab at Hooky twice.

Setting up two gigs under the pretence of helping a sick friend purely to get back at an ex-band member who voluntarily and vocally left the band five years ago is a bit cynical and twisted, don't you think? You're basically accusing Bernard of using a sick man to get one over on Hooky. That seems ridiculous to me.

My take is the new line-up has legs and could go beyond the charity gigs. I believe I read somewhere that they'll see how the gigs go and then it could go further if the collective will is there. The gigs sold out in 25 minutes flat so that is a good place to start. Hooky was very clearly not listed on the poster so fans knew what they were paying for and there still seemed to be an appetite for it. That's undeniable.

Just as there seems to be appetite for The Light touring Joy Division's back catalogue around the globe. They're both doing what they want to do. Leave 'em to it.

(And to answer the original question: nope, I didn't see it coming at all. I expected more Bad Loot shenanigans.)

0 likes

NotAMod wrote:

EdelBrock wrote: Don't see this going past the charities... as stated before I think its a setup to jab at Hooky twice.

Setting up two gigs under the pretence of helping a sick friend purely to get back at an ex-band member who voluntarily and vocally left the band five years ago is a bit cynical and twisted, don't you think? You're basically accusing Bernard of using a sick man to get one over on Hooky. That seems ridiculous to me.

My take is the new line-up has legs and could go beyond the charity gigs. I believe I read somewhere that they'll see how the gigs go and then it could go further if the collective will is there. The gigs sold out in 25 minutes flat so that is a good place to start. Hooky was very clearly not listed on the poster so fans knew what they were paying for and there still seemed to be an appetite for it. That's undeniable.

Just as there seems to be appetite for The Light touring Joy Division's back catalogue around the globe. They're both doing what they want to do. Leave 'em to it.

(And to answer the original question: nope, I didn't see it coming at all. I expected more Bad Loot shenanigans.)

I wouldn't be surprised if Bernard feels a late second (or is it 5th?) wind coming on. The Bad Lieutenant stuff was kind of a late era Electronic/WFTSC guitar rock redux. Not especially compelling, but not awful either. The songwriting dynamic will shift again, and given the rise of a new wave of indie electronic acts (Class Actress, Nite Jewel, Telepathe, Glass Candy are faves that come to mind), New Order's danceable side may be reawakened.

0 likes

leather_girl wrote:

Zachery Starkey wrote:

I mean, I don't know why people are upset. Hooky quit NO and seems happy playing JD covers with the Light, which is cool, and the other members of NO wanna carry on. Everyone is doing what they wanna do.

Agreed! :read:

+1

0 likes

JV wrote:

NotAMod wrote:

EdelBrock wrote: Don't see this going past the charities... as stated before I think its a setup to jab at Hooky twice.

Setting up two gigs under the pretence of helping a sick friend purely to get back at an ex-band member who voluntarily and vocally left the band five years ago is a bit cynical and twisted, don't you think? You're basically accusing Bernard of using a sick man to get one over on Hooky. That seems ridiculous to me.

My take is the new line-up has legs and could go beyond the charity gigs. I believe I read somewhere that they'll see how the gigs go and then it could go further if the collective will is there. The gigs sold out in 25 minutes flat so that is a good place to start. Hooky was very clearly not listed on the poster so fans knew what they were paying for and there still seemed to be an appetite for it. That's undeniable.

Just as there seems to be appetite for The Light touring Joy Division's back catalogue around the globe. They're both doing what they want to do. Leave 'em to it.

(And to answer the original question: nope, I didn't see it coming at all. I expected more Bad Loot shenanigans.)

I wouldn't be surprised if Bernard feels a late second (or is it 5th?) wind coming on. The Bad Lieutenant stuff was kind of a late era Electronic/WFTSC guitar rock redux. Not especially compelling, but not awful either. The songwriting dynamic will shift again, and given the rise of a new wave of indie electronic acts (Class Actress, Nite Jewel, Telepathe, Glass Candy are faves that come to mind), New Order's danceable side may be reawakened.

Agreed. So much of the minimal/synth/cold/whatever wave stuff that's trendy now got it's DNA from early NO. Try listening to the Peel Sessions version of "5-8-6" followed by "Black Leather Gloves" by Cosmetics.

0 likes

1963 wrote: Barney avait dit au moment de la sortie de l'album de Bad Lieutenant que s'il utilisait le nom de New Order Peter Hook lui ferait un procès. Quelques jours avant la sortie de Pictures in my mind Peter Hook n'était pas certain de la sortie de l'EP pour des problèmes juridiques. Finalement, l'EP est sorti quelques jours après la date prévue et une nouvelle compilation sort avec un inédit ... Et on voit réapparaître le nom de New Order pour deux concerts avec le grand retour de Gillian Gilbert. Dans sa "réponse", Peter Hook ne parle pas d'intenter un procès et on apprend que les 7 chansons inédites des sessions de WFTSC vont être éditées. Rappelons nous que lors du split de New Order, Stephen Morris espérait que New Order puisse se reformer le temps de finir cet album. N'y aurait il pas eu en mai un accord qui serait à l'origine de cette réapparition de New Order ?

I used Google Translate...but...

Barney said when the album release of Bad Lieutenant that if he used the name Peter Hook of New Order would make him a trial. A few days before the release of Pictures in my mind Peter Hook was not sure of the release of the EP for legal problems. Finally, the EP was released a few days after the due date and a new compilation out with a novel ... And the name is reappearing New Order for two concerts with the great return of Gillian Gilbert. In his "response", Peter Hook does not speak to sue and we learn that the seven new songs WFTSC sessions will be edited. Recall that during the New Order split, Stephen Morris hoped to re-form New Order time to finish this album. Would it not have an agreement in May which is the cause of this resurgence of New Order?

0 likes

NotAMod wrote:

Setting up two gigs under the pretence of helping a sick friend purely to get back at an ex-band member who voluntarily and vocally left the band five years ago is a bit cynical and twisted, don't you think? You're basically accusing Bernard of using a sick man to get one over on Hooky. That seems ridiculous to me.

My take is the new line-up has legs and could go beyond the charity gigs. I believe I read somewhere that they'll see how the gigs go and then it could go further if the collective will is there. The gigs sold out in 25 minutes flat so that is a good place to start. Hooky was very clearly not listed on the poster so fans knew what they were paying for and there still seemed to be an appetite for it. That's undeniable.

Agreed. I think some people are interpreting this a bit too cynically.

0 likes

leather_girl wrote:

NotAMod wrote:

Setting up two gigs under the pretence of helping a sick friend purely to get back at an ex-band member who voluntarily and vocally left the band five years ago is a bit cynical and twisted, don't you think? You're basically accusing Bernard of using a sick man to get one over on Hooky. That seems ridiculous to me.

My take is the new line-up has legs and could go beyond the charity gigs. I believe I read somewhere that they'll see how the gigs go and then it could go further if the collective will is there. The gigs sold out in 25 minutes flat so that is a good place to start. Hooky was very clearly not listed on the poster so fans knew what they were paying for and there still seemed to be an appetite for it. That's undeniable.

Agreed. I think some people are interpreting this a bit too cynically.

Granted I do believe the charity was the reason for a concert, but it could have been done many ways. Ever seen in an argument when one person goes OUT of their way to show how THEY are the sensible one (but with one of the main prefaces to really piss off the other)... Barney really seems to be the type for that type of jab, whereas Hooky would shoot his mouth off and say something stupid instead. Just watch how this charity ends and the words outta Barney's mouth. I bet $10 he'll talk about starting it for good cause (i.e. similar to Hooky's first JD shows) and how he's the bigger man knowing when to stop and not "cash in"... $10 says he'll do it.

0 likes

I'll be more than happy for Gillian to cash in too.

0 likes

JV wrote: I'll be more than happy for Gillian to cash in too.

TOTINOOT!

The Other Two Interpret New Order On Tour

:laugh:

0 likes

EdelBrock wrote: Don't see this going past the charities... as stated before I think its a setup to jab at Hooky twice.

Do you really believe that?

You dont think much of these people at all, do you?

You're making out they're taking advantage of someones serious illness just to score points at an old colleague.

Scary.

0 likes

Thank Leather Girl !

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗