Skip to content

New version of 586

Archived

59 replies · 6,226 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

I can't stop listening to it - it's sooo good! I love that they picked up the pace, and included the backward passage from the Peel Sessions version.

I want to hear them tackle Everything's Gone Green, now!

So happy to see Steve playing an acoustic drum kit again.

0 likes

It's a great version, nice to see them tweak some of the older tunes.

0 likes

That's been my earworm of the day.

0 likes

Really fabulous. Wish I could have seen/heard it in person!

0 likes

I can't stop listening to it! I really hope they play it here in Brazil. That will be the happiest day ever!

0 likes

I really love how they brought the guitar part forward while keeping it dance-y.

0 likes

BUGGER!

I've been working on a cover of that, back to the drawing board I think!

0 likes

Can someone please tell Phil that not every song automatically sounds better with a shedload of extra widdly woo geetar.

0 likes

Fookin' brilliant! :clap:

0 likes

Is it me.. or on that Paris youtube.. at about 4mins.. Barney does the 'in the future, when you wan't me in your heart, I won't be there' lines, he accompanies them with hand signals and a V sign. Is this aimed at anyone, do you reckon? :laugh:

0 likes

Burt Burterson wrote: Is it me.. or on that Paris youtube.. at about 4mins.. Barney does the 'in the future, when you wan't me in your heart, I won't be there' lines, he accompanies them with hand signals and a V sign. Is this aimed at anyone, do you reckon? :laugh:

Good point:lol: , yeah noticed the v sign he did

0 likes

50 Pound Note wrote:

So happy to see Steve playing an acoustic drum kit again.

Amen. Literally the first thought I had when I saw stills of the stage.

0 likes

Thought it was ace, they never realy captured the live feel of the original and this goes back to that in a way,

can you hear.

0 likes

Was THERE and I have to say that when it kicked in it was a very special moment, brilliant....

They've taken a track of which the studio version I've never been that keen on, and turned it into the highlight of the whole set [for me]

The youtube videos don't do it justice either, sounded 10 times better in the venue.

Hoping more recordings will surface.

0 likes

listening to it and watching the video I get goosebumps. Brilliant version of the song, but then again, I've always loved it. Makes me wonder if they can re-tool this one, what else can they re-tool? Further, what could they do with more synths in the studio mix???

Love it...just love it.

0 likes

Gnu Odor wrote:

50 Pound Note wrote: So happy to see Steve playing an acoustic drum kit again.

Amen. Literally the first thought I had when I saw stills of the stage.

Stephen used this drum kit in 2009 for the Bad Lieutenant gig in Paris :nod:

0 likes

Burt Burterson wrote: Is it me.. or on that Paris youtube.. at about 4mins.. Barney does the 'in the future, when you wan't me in your heart, I won't be there' lines, he accompanies them with hand signals and a V sign. Is this aimed at anyone, do you reckon? :laugh:

I saw that too on the video. I wonder why he's doing these hand gestures. (Not that it bothered me or anything.) For example, in the video I saw of Temptation being played in Brussels, I saw Bernard doing hand motions too.

Oh and this live version of 586 was incredible. :love:

0 likes

Fook me... That version of 586 was ace! Let's hope that if they make a studio album it's the same kinda stripped back electro-rock like this and not over-produced mid-tempo fluff (like hellbent, bad lieutenant etc... Just an opinion).

0 likes

father jack wrote: Fook me... That version of 586 was ace! Let's hope that if they make a studio album it's the same kinda stripped back electro-rock like this and not over-produced mid-tempo fluff (like hellbent, bad lieutenant etc... Just an opinion).

That would be fantastic, but I doubt it, I'd be happy if they released an album of decent live recordings of this, temptation and a few other reworked tracks.

0 likes

Meh.

:shrug: :skeptic: :shrug:

[Sequenced] Synths was what made this track what it was - special and ground-breaking.

Doing a guitar version simply does not work......in any capacity.

Neither does it being played on acoustic drums.

:nonono:

0 likes

Evolution. This should smash the crowd in Brazil. Always loved the two studio versions I knew - it's like they (Bernard) just realised he was sitting on a gold mine .When he remembers he helped on Procession it's going to be...finished?

0 likes

By 'Eck! My Neck! wrote: Meh.

:shrug: :skeptic: :shrug:

[Sequenced] Synths was what made this track what it was - special and ground-breaking.

Doing a guitar version simply does not work......in any capacity.

Neither does it being played on acoustic drums.

:nonono:

This new live version of the song still has plenty of live synths on it plus programmed bass. Phil plays one of the melody parts as a kind of funky guitar part, which I like. It might actually be a guitar on the original recording, it is hard to tell.

This version of the seems based more on the BBC live version than the album version I think.

Also, New Order always used live acoustic drums when playing this track live.

Speaking of which, I agree with everyone NO sound so much better with Steve playing an acoustic drum kit again.

0 likes

Zachery Starkey wrote:

By 'Eck! My Neck! wrote: Meh.

:shrug: :skeptic: :shrug:

[Sequenced] Synths was what made this track what it was - special and ground-breaking.

Doing a guitar version simply does not work......in any capacity.

Neither does it being played on acoustic drums.

:nonono:

This new live version of the song still has plenty of live synths on it plus programmed bass. Phil plays one of the melody parts as a kind of funky guitar part, which I like. It might actually be a guitar on the original recording, it is hard to tell.

This version of the seems based more on the BBC live version than the album version I think.

Also, New Order always used live acoustic drums when playing this track live.

Speaking of which, I agree with everyone NO sound so much better with Steve playing an acoustic drum kit again.

I agree that Steve is better playing on acoustic kit (with the odd trigger pad or electronic equipment close at hand) than that Roland electronic one he's been using for ages now....

Still can't make my mind up about this version though. So used to hearing it in a particular way, I suppose that's where my judgement is based from.

:nod:

0 likes

I like it... :thumb: But what I like more is that they seem unafraid to revisit something slightly leftfield and have a go at a rejigged version... All the speculation pre-gigs for as long as I can remember on here has been whether they would do something unexpected... Mini JD set at Wembley, AOC/586 here, etc. however good they might be, at least they make you go 'Fook - wasn't expecting that'...

Snorri xxx

0 likes

so if Gillian and Phil C. have keyboards, what does Steve do for the songs(BLT, TPK, BM, etc.) he used to play keyboards on?

0 likes

g. wrote: so if Gillian and Phil C. have keyboards, what does Steve do for the songs(BLT, TPK, BM, etc.) he used to play keyboards on?

He's still playing keyboards, too - watch some of the videos.

More hands means less sequencer lines that need to be reconstructed for their current synth setup, and/or opportunities to add new elements.

0 likes

The Sub-Cultured Perfect Kisser*!* wrote: Great!!!

Can anyone update the concert browser of this site??

Gigography

0 likes

very well noticed.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗