Skip to content

LWTUA on Permanent: Joy Division 1995

Archived

53 replies · 1,330 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

I got this awhile ago. Track 16 is the crappy permanent mix of Love Will Tear Us Apart (3:37).

But track 1 is a totally different version of Love Will tear Us Apart, different from the common 3:27 version that is on Heart & Soul. The LWTUA on Permanent is 3:11 long AND Hooky or someone can be distinctly heard singing the chorus alongside Ian Curtis. What version of LWTUA is this?

EDIT: I can talk about Joy Divsion on this message board, right?

0 likes

Who's Ian Curtis?

0 likes

Originally posted by Jason Who's Ian Curtis?

Shut the fuck up. I posted a serious question. If you want to increase the number of post you have, then stop talking shit.

Anyways, i found out at the other site that it is the Pennine version. It says the Pennine version is 3:14 thats close enough to 3:11.

EDIT: Sorry for wasting everyone's time.

0 likes

Originally posted by David Ngo > Originally posted by Jason > Who's Ian Curtis?

Shut the fuck up. I posted a serious question. If you want to increase the number of post you have, then stop talking shit.

Anyways, i found out at the other site that it is the Pennine version. It says the Pennine version is 3:14 thats close enough to 3:11.

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohhh!!!!

0 likes

Originally posted by HOOKY'S WALLET > Originally posted by David Ngo> > > > Originally posted by Jason > > Who's Ian Curtis?>

Shut the fuck up. I posted a serious question. If you want to increase the number of post you have, then stop talking shit.

Anyways, i found out at the other site that it is the Pennine version. It says the Pennine version is 3:14 thats close enough to 3:11.

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohhh!!!!

Indeed!

0 likes

Originally posted by David Ngo > Originally posted by Jason > Who's Ian Curtis?

Shut the fuck up. I posted a serious question. If you want to increase the number of post you have, then stop talking shit.

Anyways, i found out at the other site that it is the Pennine version. It says the Pennine version is 3:14 thats close enough to 3:11.

EDIT: Sorry for wasting everyone's time.

And what's the Pennine version? Who/what/where/when is Pennine?

0 likes

Originally posted by Tout est devenu vert > Originally posted by David Ngo> > > > Originally posted by Jason > > Who's Ian Curtis?>

Shut the fuck up. I posted a serious question. If you want to increase the number of post you have, then stop talking shit.

Anyways, i found out at the other site that it is the Pennine version. It says the Pennine version is 3:14 thats close enough to 3:11.

EDIT: Sorry for wasting everyone's time.

And what's the Pennine version? Who/what/where/when is Pennine?

It's the version that's 3:14, of course.

0 likes

Originally posted by Tout est devenu vert > Originally posted by David Ngo> > > > Originally posted by Jason > > Who's Ian Curtis?>

Shut the fuck up. I posted a serious question. If you want to increase the number of post you have, then stop talking shit.

Anyways, i found out at the other site that it is the Pennine version. It says the Pennine version is 3:14 thats close enough to 3:11.

EDIT: Sorry for wasting everyone's time.

And what's the Pennine version? Who/what/where/when is Pennine?

It's the uncredited one on the b-side after These Days. Also made it onto the Atmosphere CD single when it got re-released.

Pennine as in Pennine Studios.

0 likes

Originally posted by Old Blue > Originally posted by Tout est devenu vert> > > > Originally posted by David Ngo> > > > > > > Originally posted by Jason > > > Who's Ian Curtis?> > >

Shut the fuck up. I posted a serious question. If you want to increase the number of post you have, then stop talking shit.

Anyways, i found out at the other site that it is the Pennine version. It says the Pennine version is 3:14 thats close enough to 3:11.

EDIT: Sorry for wasting everyone's time.

And what's the Pennine version? Who/what/where/when is Pennine?

It's the uncredited one on the b-side after These Days. Also made it onto the Atmosphere CD single when it got re-released.

Pennine as in Pennine Studios. That is TOTALLY correct.Now can people stop swearing on this FORUM as ROCKET MICK is in DA HOUSE!:D

0 likes

Maybe you should think twice before joining a website for 30 seconds and telling people to shut the fuck up.

0 likes

Originally posted by Jason Maybe you should think twice before joining a website for 30 seconds and telling people to shut the fuck up.

OR the ARGONAUTS will get you:p

0 likes

Originally posted by Rocket Mick > Originally posted by Old Blue > Originally posted by Tout est devenu vert> > > > Originally posted by David Ngo> > > > > > > Originally posted by Jason > > > Who's Ian Curtis?> > >

Shut the fuck up. I posted a serious question. If you want to increase the number of post you have, then stop talking shit.

Anyways, i found out at the other site that it is the Pennine version. It says the Pennine version is 3:14 thats close enough to 3:11.

EDIT: Sorry for wasting everyone's time.

And what's the Pennine version? Who/what/where/when is Pennine?

It's the uncredited one on the b-side after These Days. Also made it onto the Atmosphere CD single when it got re-released.

Pennine as in Pennine Studios. That is TOTALLY correct.Now can people stop swearing on this FORUM as ROCKET MICK is in DA HOUSE!:D

I'm sorry :(

0 likes

Originally posted by Jason Maybe you should think twice before joining a website for 30 seconds and telling people to shut the fuck up.

Maybe you should stop spamming.

0 likes

Handbags at dawn

:violent: :chainsaw:

0 likes

I prefer water pistols at 10 paces...

0 likes

Originally posted by Jason Who's Ian Curtis?

Or maybe Jason wasn't spamming. I'll just take this as a sign that threads about Joy Division aren't welcome here. After all, this a New Order thread, why was i so stupid as to even think about here? Man, you people really piss me off. You ppl are in your 20/30/40s and i hope never become like you. Actually I'm gonna kill myself when i reach 19 years of age to make sure that never happens. My life is already way worse than Ian Curtis's. I haven't had any friends in about 5 years friends, i can't connect with people, i am doing bad in school, etc. Even why i post here i am rejected yet again. The very first reply to this thread is mocking me. You'll never hear from me again assholes. bye bye.

0 likes

Originally posted by David Ngo > Originally posted by Jason > Who's Ian Curtis?

Or maybe Jason wasn't spamming. I'll just take this as a sign that threads about Joy Division aren't welcome here. After all, this a New Order thread, why was i so stupid as to even think about here? Man, you people really piss me off. You ppl are in your 20/30/40s and i hope never become like you. Actually I'm gonna kill myself when i reach 19 years of age to make sure that never happens. My life is already way worse than Ian Curtis's. I haven't had any friends in about 5 years friends, i can't connect with people, i am doing bad in school, etc. Even why i post here i am rejected yet again. The very first reply to this thread is mocking me. You'll never hear from me again assholes. bye bye.

David, me young snipper of a lad, chill out, have a beer. Don't pay any attention mate, Joy Division threads are always welcome, although it's not guaranteed you'll always receive thoughtful and helpful replies. Get drunk it always helps:nod:

Jeffsy, I passed on yer best to Baldrick, he sends his best, and says when are ye comin over....I told him you weren't comin back and it had something to do with a jar of vaseline and a bears costume:lol:

0 likes

Originally posted by David Ngo > Originally posted by Jason > Who's Ian Curtis?

Or maybe Jason wasn't spamming. I'll just take this as a sign that threads about Joy Division aren't welcome here. After all, this a New Order thread, why was i so stupid as to even think about here? Man, you people really piss me off. You ppl are in your 20/30/40s and i hope never become like you. Actually I'm gonna kill myself when i reach 19 years of age to make sure that never happens. My life is already way worse than Ian Curtis's. I haven't had any friends in about 5 years friends, i can't connect with people, i am doing bad in school, etc. Even why i post here i am rejected yet again. The very first reply to this thread is mocking me. You'll never hear from me again assholes. bye bye. At LAST a sensible post!:DHope i die before i get like ROCKET MICK you mean.Well ideas are always GOOD in theory but it did not work for PETER TOWNSEND so don't try that.Just get pissed ,put on a NOLANS or BARRY MANILOW LP and the whole world will become a better place.You know there is a guy on this forum who will remain nameless but lets just call him JEFF THE CHEF and even he straightened his life out ....so there is hope even for YOU and ME.Have a nice day......listen to the wise words on IAN CURTIS who sang "HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY TALK.....TALK ABOUT THINGS YOU'D LIKE TO DO!" and have a marmite sandwich and a WALNUT WHIP.Then come back here and tell me LIFE IS GREAT. If not you should try living in CHORLEY. Rocket Mick :cool2: :redhat: AGE UNKNOWN but according to legend 102.:p

0 likes

Originally posted by ShugZV©
> Originally posted by David Ngo> > > > Originally posted by Jason > > Who's Ian Curtis?>

Or maybe Jason wasn't spamming. I'll just take this as a sign that threads about Joy Division aren't welcome here. After all, this a New Order thread, why was i so stupid as to even think about here? Man, you people really piss me off. You ppl are in your 20/30/40s and i hope never become like you. Actually I'm gonna kill myself when i reach 19 years of age to make sure that never happens. My life is already way worse than Ian Curtis's. I haven't had any friends in about 5 years friends, i can't connect with people, i am doing bad in school, etc. Even why i post here i am rejected yet again. The very first reply to this thread is mocking me. You'll never hear from me again assholes. bye bye.

David, me young snipper of a lad, chill out, have a beer. Don't pay any attention mate, Joy Division threads are always welcome, although it's not guaranteed you'll always receive thoughtful and helpful replies. Get drunk it always helps:nod:

Jeffsy, I passed on yer best to Baldrick, he sends his best, and says when are ye comin over....I told him you weren't comin back and it had something to do with a jar of vaseline and a bears costume:lol:

Yeah, Dave, lighten up. As someone who's disconnected himself from every meaningful relationship with friends and family in order to be online, I can speak for the humorous comments of us all. I always welcome a JD thread.

As for your query, The Pennine version (track 1 on Permanent) is my least favorite. I like the slower take on H&S much more. Well I shouldn't say track 1 is my least fave, considering the less-than-wonderful live takes on it.

0 likes

Originally posted by Rocket Mick[/REDRocket Mick :cool2: :redhat: AGE UNKNOWN but according to legend 102.:p

That makes you slightly younger than C. Montegomery Burns. You two should meet, you'd have a gay old time.....

0 likes

Originally posted by Taboo # 7 > Originally posted by Rocket Mick[/REDRocket Mick :cool2: :redhat: AGE UNKNOWN but according to legend 102.:p

That makes you slightly younger than C. Montegomery Burns. You two should meet, you'd have a gay old time.....

Lovely use of phrase Trev, I noticed 2 wee words in that last part which are particularly apt fer Baldy:nod: the words GAY and OLD :evil4:

And to keep it on topic:D I think the Pennine version is great, it gives you a slightly different take on the song, but for moi, the original single version cannot be bettered, one of the best intro's of all time;)

0 likes

Originally posted by ShugZV©
> Originally posted by Taboo # 7> > > > Originally posted by Rocket Mick[/REDRocket Mick :cool2: :redhat: AGE UNKNOWN but according to legend 102.:p>

That makes you slightly younger than C. Montegomery Burns. You two should meet, you'd have a gay old time.....

Lovely use of phrase Trev, I noticed 2 wee words in that last part which are particularly apt fer Baldy:nod: the words GAY and OLD :evil4:

And to keep it on topic:D I think the Pennine version is great, it gives you a slightly different take on the song, but for moi, the original single version cannot be bettered, one of the best intro's of all time;)

Although this version is good the ORIGINAL is my fave rave too.When have you ever kept on TOPIC unless you are talking shite to MAJOR T about what it would be like to have a GIRLFRIEND.:DAnyhow i have a mate who has been in several studios with HOOKY and REVENGE and he says he is a decent sort of chap.Whatever happened to that guitar IAN played in the vid?Saw Barney play one like it once but not sure if it is the same one.Also the shirt in that video that BARNEY wore is now in MY wardrobe.I wonder if it will ever come out again ,probably when SHUGZV comes out the closet.:D

0 likes

Originally posted by Rocket Mick > Originally posted by ShugZV© > > > > Originally posted by Taboo # 7> > > > > > > Originally posted by Rocket Mick[/REDRocket Mick :cool2: :redhat: AGE UNKNOWN but according to legend 102.:p> > >

That makes you slightly younger than C. Montegomery Burns. You two should meet, you'd have a gay old time.....

Lovely use of phrase Trev, I noticed 2 wee words in that last part which are particularly apt fer Baldy:nod: the words GAY and OLD :evil4:

And to keep it on topic:D I think the Pennine version is great, it gives you a slightly different take on the song, but for moi, the original single version cannot be bettered, one of the best intro's of all time;)

Although this version is good the ORIGINAL is my fave rave too.When have you ever kept on TOPIC unless you are talking shite to MAJOR T about what it would be like to have a GIRLFRIEND.:DAnyhow i have a mate who has been in several studios with HOOKY and REVENGE and he says he is a decent sort of chap.Whatever happened to that guitar IAN played in the vid?Saw Barney play one like it once but not sure if it is the same one.Also the shirt in that video that BARNEY wore is now in MY wardrobe.I wonder if it will ever come out again ,probably when SHUGZV comes out the closet.:D

:lol: Firstly, I'm sure I've seen Barney playing Ian's white guitar used in the video (and concerts), but I remember an interview, not too long back, where Barney says he lent Gillian's guitar for LWTUA at the last couple of gigs, so I'm not exactly sure with this one. Secondly, when someone gives me the ammunition (even when it's on-topic) I feel I have a responsobility to try and be witty in reply, obviously this fails sometimes and I get a warning:lol: But I DO try to bring it back on topic;) The last time I came out of a closet, the wardrobe monsters where having a party in me room:D

SHUT THAT DOOR

0 likes

Originally posted by Rocket Mick Whatever happened to that guitar IAN played in the vid?Saw Barney play one like it once but not sure if it is the same one.:D

Sadly it was stolen, along with the rest of the band's gear, a week after Barney was seen using it at the Ukrainian National Home gig that was videoed for Taras Shevchenko and later featured on 316. It was a Vox Teardrop (Curtis also had a Vox Phantom) - Italian make, there's a place up by Wembley that sells them. Pretty rare now, and horrible sounding things !!

0 likes

Originally posted by Benny's Cobweb Eyes > Originally posted by Rocket Mick > Whatever happened to that guitar IAN played in the vid?Saw Barney play one like it once but not sure if it is the same one.:D

Sadly it was stolen, along with the rest of the band's gear, a week after Barney was seen using it at the Ukrainian National Home gig that was videoed for Taras Shevchenko and later featured on 316. It was a Vox Teardrop (Curtis also had a Vox Phantom) - Italian make, there's a place up by Wembley that sells them. Pretty rare now, and horrible sounding things !!

Nope. The original white Vox Phantom that Ian used to have is still with Barney and it was even used at "24 Hour Party People" movie. There is an article at movie's website about original equipment used in the filming. Just follow this link: http://217.204.45.80/film_sub.php?section=1&subsection=2&article_id=35

0 likes

Originally posted by Ricardo Fernandes > Originally posted by Benny's Cobweb Eyes> > > > Originally posted by Rocket Mick > > Whatever happened to that guitar IAN played in the vid?Saw Barney play one like it once but not sure if it is the same one.:D>

Sadly it was stolen, along with the rest of the band's gear, a week after Barney was seen using it at the Ukrainian National Home gig that was videoed for Taras Shevchenko and later featured on 316. It was a Vox Teardrop (Curtis also had a Vox Phantom) - Italian make, there's a place up by Wembley that sells them. Pretty rare now, and horrible sounding things !!

Nope. The original white Vox Phantom that Ian used to have is still with Barney and it was even used at "24 Hour Party People" movie. There is an article at movie's website about original equipment used in the filming. Just follow this link: http://217.204.45.80/film_sub.php?section=1&subsection=2&article_id=35

Also, in Ideal for Living there's some pics of Barney with the Vox (not the pox) in January '82, so it couldn't have been with the missing loot from earlier. I thought the equipment was stolen BEFORE Taras Shev....? :confused:

0 likes

Thanks to the three of you above.I have often wondered what happened to this.Great anecdotes and i vaguely remember a story of the equipment getting nicked. Rocket Mick:redhat:

0 likes

Originally posted by David Ngo > Originally posted by Jason > Who's Ian Curtis?

Or maybe Jason wasn't spamming. I'll just take this as a sign that threads about Joy Division aren't welcome here. After all, this a New Order thread, why was i so stupid as to even think about here? Man, you people really piss me off. You ppl are in your 20/30/40s and i hope never become like you. Actually I'm gonna kill myself when i reach 19 years of age to make sure that never happens. My life is already way worse than Ian Curtis's. I haven't had any friends in about 5 years friends, i can't connect with people, i am doing bad in school, etc. Even why i post here i am rejected yet again. The very first reply to this thread is mocking me. You'll never hear from me again assholes. bye bye.

man, i go away for one day and look at what happens! hope this guy is still alive and hasn't watched any werner herzog films/listened to iggy pop lately...and can take a little sarcasm (and friendly mocking). :D

if you're still around jason, you're welcome here, mate! just chill out a bit. we talk about JD all the time!

0 likes

What's this stuff about a PENILE version ?

And people from Mississauga, Ontario posting on this board ?

I'm losing my mind

0 likes

Originally posted by Warm Hands, Cold Heart What's this stuff about a PENILE version ?And people from Mississauga, Ontario posting on this board ?I'm losing my mind

what's wrong with being from ontario and mississauga?:(

0 likes

The version of "LWTUA" on "Permanent" was originally released as the 7" version with the tombstone looking cover. Then it was released later as the b-side on the 12" (the black version with the angel statue) when the group rerecorded it.

0 likes

Originally posted by Low-Life The version of "LWTUA" on "Permanent" was originally released as the 7" version with the tombstone looking cover. Then it was released later as the b-side on the 12" (the black version with the angel statue) when the group rerecorded it.

Sorry mate, but that's not correct. The "Pennine" version of LWTUA was recorded before the single version, and the sleeve notes to Heart and Soul actually refer to the "Pennine" version as "Love Will Tear Us Apart version 1".

Both the 7" and 12" A sides only ever had the single version (which was recorded a few days later at Strawberry Studios). The "Pennine" version was on the B side of both 7" and 12" after These Days, but I believe it was uncredited on the 7". In fact, doesn't the B side of the 7" play at 33rpm?

0 likes

'Don't Disillusion Me' Old Blue. surely you know the answer without checking...

0 likes

More specifically, which version 'exactly' is the genuine version? and why was this not included on Permanent?

Can anyone verify whether 'seating' is any good for the Manchester (Evening News?) Arena? - pal of mine is heading that way subject to on-site referrals.

Actually on the LWTUA lines can someone outline the exact history - it's something that's also been bugging me for years as the subtle differences make identifying version to version very tricky and quite frankly, this just won't do.

:hat:

0 likes

I think the "Pennine" version was included on Permanent because they'd put the single version on Substance? Just my theory.

The "Pennine" LWTUA starts with a guitar strum from the Vox Teardrop that's been mentioned elsewhere, and generally has a lighter and more upbeat feel to the single version. I'm sure there is a more eloquent way of describing the difference, if someone wants to help me out.

As I said, the two versions were recorded within days of each other, but I don't know what prompted them to choose which would be the single.

0 likes

Originally posted by OnlyOneKenObe©
'Don't Disillusion Me' Old Blue. surely you know the answer without checking...

Uh-oh...busted again.

0 likes

Sorry Blue, just to clarify. The Permanent version is the 'Pennine' mix recorded around the same time as the original single release? ... sounds to me like the Permanent version is a new mix - the drums seem re-mastered, even re-done. Anyone observe that Permanent is wrongly labelled just to add further confused beats.

12" mix the same as the 7" original?

Chance to immediately redeem yourself here Blue.

:hat:

Any answer to my Manc. question above? (please)

0 likes

I'm getting confused now!

Yes, the LWTUA on Permanent (track 1, that is) is the so-called "Pennine" version. I've not noticed much difference in the drums to be honest , Huntsy. This version is on the B-side of both vinyl formats. The "Permanent" mix an after-market remix.

The "single version" is indeed the same on both 7 and 12.

0 likes

Blue, as George mentions, it does also sound very new to me as well. You may need to adjust your knowledge base slightly, taking into account Permanent is indeed a new mix thus could not be on the B-side of any original JD release.

Please, let us clarify this situation:

JD LWTUA 7" and 12" JD Substance (original release) JD Permanent new mix (new drums, new backing - possibly Peter Hook new vocal on chorus, introduction of more prominent synth line after chorus)

If the above is correct, then what, pray tell, is on the B-side of the original 7 and 12" releases? ... and I'm about to drop the bomb ... 'She's Lost Control', identify the variations. One is definitely more 'beaty' with a masterful 'dunk' as the snare, the other has guitars higher in the mix thus the drums less evident. Snares sound slightly different on two mixes (at least).

:hat:

0 likes

... also, that the 'Permanent' CD is mis-labelled with the new mix and the original mix switched.

:hat:

0 likes

Originally posted by Huntsman Blue, as George mentions, it does also sound very new to me as well. You may need to adjust your knowledge base slightly, taking into account Permanent is indeed a new mix thus could not be on the B-side of any original JD release.Please, let us clarify this situation:JD LWTUA 7" and 12"JD Substance (original release)JD Permanent new mix (new drums, new backing - possibly Peter Hook new vocal on chorus, introduction of more prominent synth line after chorus)If the above is correct, then what, pray tell, is on the B-side of the original 7 and 12" releases? ... and I'm about to drop the bomb ... 'She's Lost Control', identify the variations. One is definitely more 'beaty' with a masterful 'dunk' as the snare, the other has guitars higher in the mix thus the drums less evident. Snares sound slightly different on two mixes (at least).:hat:

err, you're losing me. I'm probably not being clear, but yes, the "Permanent" mix is new, I wasn't saying that was the B-side! It's the other version on that CD I was talking about.

I'm off for a lie down.

0 likes

The b-side of the 7", The 'Pennine' version, is the first recorded version. It was later re-recorded as the version we all know and love. The Pennine version is faster and less produced, more akin to the live takes and the Peel session version. In fact, the studio version we all know is actually the oddity as it's differnet from the way the usually played it.

The re-mix is a stupid piece of crap that was done in the 90's.

0 likes

Originally posted by Agentwood > Originally posted by David Ngo> > > > Originally posted by Jason > > Who's Ian Curtis?>

Or maybe Jason wasn't spamming. I'll just take this as a sign that threads about Joy Division aren't welcome here. After all, this a New Order thread, why was i so stupid as to even think about here? Man, you people really piss me off. You ppl are in your 20/30/40s and i hope never become like you. Actually I'm gonna kill myself when i reach 19 years of age to make sure that never happens. My life is already way worse than Ian Curtis's. I haven't had any friends in about 5 years friends, i can't connect with people, i am doing bad in school, etc. Even why i post here i am rejected yet again. The very first reply to this thread is mocking me. You'll never hear from me again assholes. bye bye.

man, i go away for one day and look at what happens! hope this guy is still alive and hasn't watched any werner herzog films/listened to iggy pop lately...and can take a little sarcasm (and friendly mocking). :D

if you're still around jason, you're welcome here, mate! just chill out a bit. we talk about JD all the time!

I haven't been online since Friday, so by now I don't really even care about the whole issue anymore. I was being sarcastic when I said 'who's Ian Curtis'. I don't need to be told to learn how to take sarcasm. Thank you anyhow.

0 likes

Shit! You were talking about the other guy not being able to take sarcasm! My mistake.

I'm not going to post anymore until I wake up a little.

0 likes

Jase - either way the original fella took you all wrong, his following posts about being depressed declared he had a few personal problems. This may have led him to find your initial retort personally offensive.

Everyone else, on the other hand, can spot a gag from 50 miles.

So keep it up.

:hat:

0 likes

Damn i missed all the fun. This thread had it all - an idiot, mass confusion and someone who has no friends. Brilliant.

0 likes

Originally posted by Old Blue > Originally posted by Low-Life> The version of "LWTUA" on "Permanent" was originally released as the 7" version with the tombstone looking cover. Then it was released later as the b-side on the 12" (the black version with the angel statue) when the group rerecorded it.

Sorry mate, but that's not correct. The "Pennine" version of LWTUA was recorded before the single version, and the sleeve notes to Heart and Soul actually refer to the "Pennine" version as "Love Will Tear Us Apart version 1".

Both the 7" and 12" A sides only ever had the single version (which was recorded a few days later at Strawberry Studios). The "Pennine" version was on the B side of both 7" and 12" after These Days, but I believe it was uncredited on the 7". In fact, doesn't the B side of the 7" play at 33rpm?

Yes 33 rpm it is!:D

0 likes

Originally posted by Jason Shit! You were talking about the other guy not being able to take sarcasm! My mistake.I'm not going to post anymore until I wake up a little.

oops, i meant to say david, not you jason. oh, well, you understood what i meant anyway...no harm done, then! on with the 'permanent' discussion....

0 likes

the first time i heard the pennine version i didn't like it as much because i was so used to the other version. then i got it on a CD mix and started listening to it all the time. now i appreciate both of them, but i'm still definitely partial to the single!

0 likes

I haven't really said much about the actual topic, so here goes.

I've always liked Track 16 better than the Track 1 on Permanent, except I do like the keyboard line coming thru a little more on Track 1. There's a counter-melody that you can hear on Track 1 that doesn't stand out as much on Track 16. But, all in all, track 16 sounds much less muddy, and I do like clarity in my music.

0 likes

Originally posted by Jason I haven't really said much about the actual topic, so here goes. I've always liked Track 16 better than the Track 1 on Permanent, except I do like the keyboard line coming thru a little more on Track 1. There's a counter-melody that you can hear on Track 1 that doesn't stand out as much on Track 16. But, all in all, track 16 sounds much less muddy, and I do like clarity in my music.

I also like the Track 16 version of LWTUA on Perm better. I always liked the fact that it sounds kinda like Ian is still playing the guitar during the singing part, instead of gripping the microphone (of course that's probably just Hooky double-tracked or something, as it is a remix, but oh well)

0 likes

yes and can anyone explain why the vinyl version of substance has a longer version of shes lost contol extended than the cd copy??

0 likes

Originally posted by Ian Pillar yes and can anyone explain why the vinyl versionof substance has a longer version of shes lost contol extended than the cd copy??

You are talking about the keyboard solo at the end, right? Not all vinyl versions of "Substance" have this one (for instance, my Brazilian vinyl of "Substance" doesn't). The full version with no fade out in the keyboard solo can also be found at "Martin" compilation (FAC 325) and "Heart and Soul" boxset.

But don't ask me why there are two versions of this recording, as I don't know! ;)

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗