Skip to content

Peter Hook: Substance: Inside New Order

Archived

289 replies · 339,308 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.
· edited

surface wrote:

Milkshock wrote: A poor read tbh. Lays into everyone - Bernard gets dogs abuse all the way through, Gillian is dismissed out of hand entirely and Steve barely gets a mention.

The whole thing revolves around how his bass was sabotaged out of records, Bernard's alleged dictatorial tendencies and ridiculous amounts of drugs and groupies.

I'm only up to Power Corruption and Lies and am finding the constant sniping at Bernard to be very off putting. You would have thought someone would have said, remember a lot of readers won't have sides so go easy on the slagging off.

Agreed - I'm actually shocked that the book was released in the state it is. It's practically libellous in some cases. Bernard's crimes include being late consistently for recording sessions??? You get the feeling apart from the drugs and groupies he hated being in the band at all. Maybe that was the case but then why write a book about it then?

1 1 like

Milkshock wrote: A poor read tbh. Lays into everyone - Bernard gets dogs abuse all the way through, Gillian is dismissed out of hand entirely and Steve barely gets a mention.

The whole thing revolves around how his bass was sabotaged out of records, Bernard's alleged dictatorial tendencies and ridiculous amounts of drugs and groupies.

I believe that were I to find myself in a band with Peter Hook, then I too would quickly adopt a dictatorial approach. And I do not possess a fraction of Barney's genuine talent.

1 1 like
· edited

Hook talking about his book on BBC Radio 5 live in a mo.

[TWITTER]785446051503284225[/TWITTER]

(Nihal is now a serious talk-y presenter? Where's Bobby Friction?)

EDIT: Where was Hook when the others "did the dirty" on him?

If you listen back later on, it's about 1hr40 into the radio show, and it's quite long.

1 1 like

New Order star Peter Hook has defended his decision to write about his tumultuous marriage to Caroline Aherne in his explosive new autobiography - and says he hopes it helps victims of abuse.

Bassist Hooky reveals in his book, Substance, that he became an “abused husband” during his rocky three year relationship with Mrs Merton star Caroline in the 1990s, claiming she attacked him during jealous rages.

Caroline died in July aged 52 after a third battle with cancer - and many have questioned his decision to speak out about their relationship now, in his third book which covers the 30 year period of his life in the band New Order.

But Hooky says: “I’ve always been very honest in every book, and it is the same thing here.

“If you’re going to tell the truth, you have to tell the truth about everything. You can’t just pick and choose, you talk about every important part of your life. It’s the story of my life.

“I’ve been a successful musician for 40 years, and that [relationship] was a small part of my life, it is 15 pages in a 700-odd page book.

“I didn’t play it up, I thought I handled it very fairly considering what it did to me. I’ve told the truth, and if you’re going to be damned for telling the truth then so be it.”

Hooky said he hoped that talking openly about the abuse would help others.

He said: “What I was trying to show is that there is life after abuse, you hope you can be an inspiration to people that you don’t have to suffer in silence, and that you can move on from it.

“I moved on with the help of many great friends and meeting Becky [his wife of 20 years].

“What we should be celebrating is my 20 year successful marriage which shows what can be achieved when two people love each other and respect each other.”

Hooky admits it was “disappointing” to see the angry reaction of Caroline’s family and friends to his claims, including her Royle Family co-star Ricky Tomlinson who said Hooky was wrong to write about the marriage in his book.

He says wryly: “I never thought I’d be fighting with Ricky Tomlinson about this. For people to turn around and say that I’m “less of a man” for talking about it, they are perpetuating that stigma against male victims of abuse.

“Would I ring Ricky Tomlinson up and tell him how to write the book of his life? Of course not.”

Hooky headed to talk about his book and music career at a public event with Inspiral Carpets star Clint Boon on Monday night, and will be back at Salford Lads Club on Saturday night with another in conversation event with the M.E.N’s Dianne Bourne.

The book is an encyclopedic account of Hook’s music career and associations with Factory Records and the Hacienda, and the band New Order.

He charts the band’s transition from Joy Division after the tragic death of lead singer Ian Curtis in 1980 into New Order; the band’s rise to global success and the rock ‘n’ roll excesses along the way in eye-popping detail.

And Hooky hasn’t ruled out another book in the future - this one ends in 2007 when he split from his former bandmates Bernard Sumner and Stephen Morris.

Hooky says: “What struck me is that none of my books has a happy ending, I’d love to do one with a happy ending. One where New Order aren’t at each other’s throats and me and Bernard go off holding hands together.”

MEN

I've yet to receive my copy,

1 1 like

He is on BBC news in the next half hour

1 1 like

surface wrote: He is on BBC news in the next half hour

😎 Approx 08.50/55

0 likes
· edited

He should be giving the BBC Kickbacks. On 6 Music this afternoon.

[TWITTER]785494353431105537[/TWITTER]

He did the Manchester leg of his book tour last night - which I guess he manged to arrange his BBC (Manchester) appearances around. Clint Boon was asking the questions last night at the Chop House, and he has apparently recorded it for his podcast.

[TWITTER]785619536636702720[/TWITTER]

There's a review of his Sage, Gateshead talk HERE (my web adviser said the site might be risky but...it's not).

1 1 like

BazG wrote: I’d love to do one with a happy ending. One where New Order aren’t at each other’s throats and me and Bernard go off holding hands together.”

MEN

What a fucking stupid fucking thing for him of all fucking people to fucking say. Sorry for my language. I split an infinitive.

1 1 like

ROCKET MICK wrote:

surface wrote: He is on BBC news in the next half hour

😎 Approx 08.50/55

Missed this.When you say BBC news do you mean BBC Breakfast? Can't imagine Hooky is that important that he gets a spot on BBC news whereas BBC breakfast usually has a guest around the 8.50/9am mark.Not that i watch it religiously, obvs but i sometimes see some of it because they have it on the tv in the canteen at work.Anyway, looked for BBC Breakfast on catch up but apparently it's not available on catch up/ iPlayer.No great loss and i did catch the long interview on BBC Radio 5Live yesterday and BBC 6Music today.

I'm quite enjoying the book so far though obviously the Barney and the others bashing can get tiresome.

1 1 like

On the 6music programme with Mark Radcliffe, Hooky seems to be suggesting that details of his court spat with New Order can all be found online. it has been very quiet on this subject, so was interested to hear that it had progressed.

2 2 likes

Fotzepolitic wrote:

do you mean BBC Breakfast? Can't imagine Hooky is that important that he gets a spot on BBC news whereas BBC breakfast usually has a guest around the 8.50/9am mark.

Yes, it was that. (Bernard's done it before hasn't he?) If you went to "BBC1 Live" on the bbc website within a couple of hours you could "rewind" back to BBC breakfast. Anyway you missed little. Both radio interviews were better. The only thing I remember now is how well Lousie Minchin can turn on the charm.

2 2 likes

😴 Quite relieved to have missed all the interviews today actually. He’s like one of those politicians I try to avoid cos they put my blood pressure up. We’re all pawns in his game, enough already.

1 1 like

I'n about a third of the way through and I must admit its boring me a little now

At the moment the snipe's at Barney seem to have turned into snipe's at Gillian but blaming it all on Barney!!??

Its makes me laugh how when chapter and verse came out he claimed Barney was obsessed with him as it was constantly on about him...when I don't really think it was?

Yet substance is just relentless from the very start slagging Barney!

Its about time he got on with writing some new music and lets see if he's as good as he seems to think he is

The blokes a shithouse

1 1 like

lee wrote:

The blokes a shithouse

This sums the cunt up for me, in Bernard's book he touched on the fact that he could not understand why Hook turned everything into Hook v himself, I think that short sentance has done more to wind Hook up than a thousand page novel slagging him off. So what does stupid bollocks Hook do, prove Bernard to be 100% correct in what he thought by publishing this steaming turd of a book. And you know full well that when Steve releases his book, and if there is a slight dig at Hook, the hairy bastard will then pen book number 100000000000 to have a pop at Steve but no doubt get back to slagging Bernard off.

1 1 like

Michael Monkhouse wrote:

BazG wrote: I’d love to do one with a happy ending. One where New Order aren’t at each other’s throats and me and Bernard go off holding hands together.”

MEN

What a fucking stupid fucking thing for him of all fucking people to fucking say. Sorry for my language. I split an infinitive.

I clocked that and wondered if it signalled the case wasn't going well for him and that he was waving a white flag.

1 1 like

I'm loving the book and I will tell him so at the Ace Hotel tomorrow. Regards to the posse from JDC.

1 1 like

Alex_Loyal wrote:

lee wrote:

The blokes a shithouse

This sums the cunt up for me, in Bernard's book he touched on the fact that he could not understand why Hook turned everything into Hook v himself, I think that short sentance has done more to wind Hook up than a thousand page novel slagging him off. So what does stupid bollocks Hook do, prove Bernard to be 100% correct in what he thought by publishing this steaming turd of a book. And you know full well that when Steve releases his book, and if there is a slight dig at Hook, the hairy bastard will then pen book number 100000000000 to have a pop at Steve but no doubt get back to slagging Bernard off.

Very true. Is there a pyschologist in the house who can sum up his condition? Haven't been able to stop laughing since he started 'disc jockeying'. Or as someone else aptly put it, "trying to be the post-punk Peter Stringfellow."

1 1 like

Whatever your opinion of who's wrong /right surely the guy deserves more respect than being referred to as a "cunt" "shithouse" etc...particularly on a NO forum of all places?

Whether you agree with his version of events (and is be surprised if anyone on here genuinely has any knowledge of the inner workings of NO), he is a large part of the reason we are here.

2 2 likes

To quote Hooky in a recent interview; "You can't just take 31 years of someone's life and suddenly decide how much they're going to profit from it going forward". If you don't like the man, then that's fine and your opinion but calling him a 'cunt' and a 'shithouse'? He's still one of the integral members of the best band of the 80s and if it wasn't for him, then every album after Low-Life would be regarded in the same light as the maligned Republic. If anyone's a money-grabbing, disrespectful cunt, it's Tom Chapman. He wasn't there during the Joy Division years, the golden-era of New Order, The Hacienda, he didn't know Rob Gretton, Martin Hannett, Tony Wilson etc. and he thinks he can just take the job of one of the most influential bass players of all time? Fuck that guy. It's like if some random 30 year old took Keith Richards role in The Rolling Stones.

1 1 like

YourSilentFace wrote: To quote Hooky in a recent interview; "You can't just take 31 years of someone's life and suddenly decide how much they're going to profit from it going forward". If you don't like the man, then that's fine and your opinion but calling him a 'cunt' and a 'shithouse'? He's still one of the integral members of the best band of the 80s and if it wasn't for him, then every album after Low-Life would be regarded in the same light as the maligned Republic. If anyone's a money-grabbing, disrespectful cunt, it's Tom Chapman. He wasn't there during the Joy Division years, the golden-era of New Order, The Hacienda, he didn't know Rob Gretton, Martin Hannett, Tony Wilson etc. and he thinks he can just take the job of one of the most influential bass players of all time? Fuck that guy. It's like if some random 30 year old took Keith Richards role in The Rolling Stones.

What a stupid fucking comment. So what were they meant to do, continue without a bass player. Tom has done nothing wrong, he was already playing with Bernard/Steve and Phil as part of Bad Lieutenant, who played a few NO songs in their set, so it made sense for him to join NO.

Your post is one of the most stupid cuntish posts I have read on this forum you fucking dick head!

3 3 likes

YourSilentFace wrote: To quote Hooky in a recent interview; "... if it wasn't for him, then every album after Low-Life would be regarded in the same light as the maligned Republic.

Republic is not maligned. Republic is a great album with some of New Order's best songwriting...

1 1 like

surface wrote:

YourSilentFace wrote: To quote Hooky in a recent interview; "You can't just take 31 years of someone's life and suddenly decide how much they're going to profit from it going forward". If you don't like the man, then that's fine and your opinion but calling him a 'cunt' and a 'shithouse'? He's still one of the integral members of the best band of the 80s and if it wasn't for him, then every album after Low-Life would be regarded in the same light as the maligned Republic. If anyone's a money-grabbing, disrespectful cunt, it's Tom Chapman. He wasn't there during the Joy Division years, the golden-era of New Order, The Hacienda, he didn't know Rob Gretton, Martin Hannett, Tony Wilson etc. and he thinks he can just take the job of one of the most influential bass players of all time? Fuck that guy. It's like if some random 30 year old took Keith Richards role in The Rolling Stones.

What a stupid fucking comment. So what were they meant to do, continue without a bass player. Tom has done nothing wrong, he was already playing with Bernard/Steve and Phil as part of Bad Lieutenant, who played a few NO songs in their set, so it made sense for him to join NO.

Your post is one of the most stupid cuntish posts I have read on this forum you fucking dick head!

Agree other Tom Chapman point, don't see he has done much, if anything wrong.

The last comment though, really?

1 1 like

Unless, of course, you ARE Tom Chapman, in which case, fair comment I guess!

1 1 like

YourSilentFace wrote: To quote Hooky in a recent interview; "You can't just take 31 years of someone's life and suddenly decide how much they're going to profit from it going forward". If you don't like the man, then that's fine and your opinion but calling him a 'cunt' and a 'shithouse'? He's still one of the integral members of the best band of the 80s and if it wasn't for him, then every album after Low-Life would be regarded in the same light as the maligned Republic. If anyone's a money-grabbing, disrespectful cunt, it's Tom Chapman. He wasn't there during the Joy Division years, the golden-era of New Order, The Hacienda, he didn't know Rob Gretton, Martin Hannett, Tony Wilson etc. and he thinks he can just take the job of one of the most influential bass players of all time? Fuck that guy. It's like if some random 30 year old took Keith Richards role in The Rolling Stones.

Well, someone had to do the job after Hook leaving - If I work 30 years with my friends in a company and decide to leave, I also can't force them to close the business, can I? Unfortunately Hook hasn't got much too offer creative-wise since him leaving, except calling a certain someone continously "Twatto", and playing 30 year old songs which have been written mostly by said twatto. If I come to think about it, he is exactly this, a cunt and a shithouse. Some people realise their mistakes and stubbornness with time, Hook seems to go all the way until there will be no one else left with him.

3 3 likes

I think Tom's doing a good job as it really can't have been easy facing new order fans as it could have gone either way....I remember at his first Apollo gig somebody launched a pint at him and he stood in the background the entire gig after that

But I think everybody accepts him now?

Back to the subject of the book it has totally put me off seeing hook and his covers band again

I used to see the split as best of both worlds gig wise but he can stick them now

The man IS a cunt and a shithouse and many other names

And not just the Barney and Gillian name calling but the Mrs Merton stuff is a just low..even if its true he should have been a man and spoke out while she was alive to defend herself

1 1 like

No publicity is bad publicity. Forums 2016: 1. Hooky's a wanker. 2. Hooky's a tosser. 3. Hooky's a dick. 4. I hate Hooky. 5. Hooky can fuck off. 6. Hooky's an asshole. 7. Hooky's an asshole. 8. Hooky. 9. Hooky the cock. 10. Mike, SHUT UP about Mel C: it's sooooooooooo repetitive.

1 1 like

I too was at the Bath event the Friday just gone and there's no denying that Peter Hook makes for a decent raconteur. No denying either that, as he sat there patiently signing copies of his book and posing for pictures, he makes the effort with the fans.

I don't one bit like the public hostility and gutter sniping toward his former band mates, but think it's also worthwhile noting that it's not an attitude he shows toward the fans, few if any of whom are really privy to the ins and outs of the big fallout.

3 3 likes

gabrielgee wrote: I'm loving the book and I will tell him so at the Ace Hotel tomorrow. Regards to the posse from JDC.

Will see you there, young man! [hi]

1 1 like

Papabendi wrote: On the 6music programme with Mark Radcliffe, Hooky seems to be suggesting that details of his court spat with New Order can all be found online. it has been very quiet on this subject, so was interested to hear that it had progressed.

Yup, it's all out there as far as I know.

Just done a google and can't find the detail - everyone (NME, BBC, daily press) seems to mention the case so it's hard to track down - but there are some legal sites out there which lay out the fine points of what the case involves.

1 1 like

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗