Skip to content

Would you mind this guest vocalist on the upcoming album?

Archived

44 replies · 819 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Well, people didn't like having Billy Corgan nor Bobbie Gilespie on Get Ready....

But how would you feel if both part would have been done by Hooky himself? or on the next album? Would it be the same?

Is New Order strictly Bernard (minus the Movement songs we know) ?

0 likes

I'm not fond of Hooky's voice, since it sounds too harsh. Actually, I wouldn't mind David Gahan singing with Barney on the album. Or, if Neil Tennant sang on a track, that wouldn't be bad, either. He and Barney always sounded good together.

0 likes

Hooky would be a good voice to add on certain types of tracks, but I am just hoping for no more high profile junk voices being featured.

0 likes

What about Phil Cunningham? I really think he matches perfectly. At least he showed off quite fairly.

0 likes

Having guest singers means absolutely nothing to me. I like my bands to be self-contained and creative.

0 likes

Originally posted by Spotnick Well, people didn't like having Billy Corgan nor Bobbie Gilespie on Get Ready....But how would you feel if both part would have been done by Hooky himself? or on the next album? Would it be the same?Is New Order strictly Bernard (minus the Movement songs we know) ?

I'm not sure I understand exactly where you are coming from with this question. Hooky is part of New Order, it doesn't matter which member of New Order sings (besides Steve, who can't!!) though I'd baulk at Phil singing. New Order has always been Bernard and Hooky singing, sure Bernard sings more than Hooky, but Hooky has always done backing vocals. I'd have no qualms about Hooky singing if he wanted to, but will raise two questions of my own:

  1. why this perceived need (from fans) to have a different vocalist just because the last record had them? Get Ready's guest performers was an experiment, partly because they'd been away for so long they needed the fallback of a way into the US market, such as using Corgan. The marketing of the album before it came out virtually admitted as much, the blurb concentrated on Corgan/Gillespie rather than Bernard, Hooky and Steve!

  2. what is wrong with just having Bernard sing them? He's by far the best vocalist they have, to the extent that they now use the fragility of his voice as an instrument in itself, it is the counterbalance by which the songs hang, in much the same way that they used to use a single keyboard line. Who do people always want things to change?

0 likes

Originally posted by Nick Name > Originally posted by Spotnick> > > Well, people didn't like having Billy Corgan nor Bobbie Gilespie on Get Ready....> > > But how would you feel if both part would have been done by Hooky himself? or on the next album? Would it be the same?> > > Is New Order strictly Bernard (minus the Movement songs we know) ?> > >

I'm not sure I understand exactly where you are coming from with this question. Hooky is part of New Order, it doesn't matter which member of New Order sings (besides Steve, who can't!!) though I'd baulk at Phil singing. New Order has always been Bernard and Hooky singing, sure Bernard sings more than Hooky, but Hooky has always done backing vocals. I'd have no qualms about Hooky singing if he wanted to, but will raise two questions of my own:

  1. why this perceived need (from fans) to have a different vocalist just because the last record had them? Get Ready's guest performers was an experiment, partly because they'd been away for so long they needed the fallback of a way into the US market, such as using Corgan. The marketing of the album before it came out virtually admitted as much, the blurb concentrated on Corgan/Gillespie rather than Bernard, Hooky and Steve!

  2. what is wrong with just having Bernard sing them? He's by far the best vocalist they have, to the extent that they now use the fragility of his voice as an instrument in itself, it is the counterbalance by which the songs hang, in much the same way that they used to use a single keyboard line. Who do people always want things to change?

Right on, brother!!:thumb:

0 likes

i say stick to barney and hooky,we dont need no education,sorry we dont need no guest singers especially billy corgan . what a load of tosh,that whiney voice ,that stupid bloody hat pulled down over that stupid face..........get the picture? :nuts:

0 likes

I was expecting a reply like this Tim...

As far as I know, nobody ever complained about the duet on Someone Like You for the chorus... apart that it is cheesy.

I don't say there will be guest vocalists, plus, it can't be a guest vocalist if it's a member of the band OF COURSE, the idea was to attrack people into this thread.

But I mean, why not asking Hooky to do it, unless it's impossible at that moment (example, Rock The Shack in the Evening Sessions)

0 likes

Originally posted by Spotnick As far as I know, nobody ever complained about the duet on Someone Like You for the chorus... apart that it is cheesy.P>

I thought Gillian's backing vox sat quite well on that particular song.:shrug:

0 likes

Gillian

0 likes

Originally posted by Aleph Gillian

:evil4:

0 likes

Originally posted by This blue-eyed boy that wants to be I'm not fond of Hooky's voice, since it sounds too harsh. Actually, I wouldn't mind David Gahan singing with Barney on the album. Or, if Neil Tennant sang on a track, that wouldn't be bad, either. He and Barney always sounded good together.[/quote

Hooky voice is better than that girly squeaky Neil Tennants.

0 likes

I think the biggest clue here lies within. They've made seven albums or whatever it is, plus two as Joy Division, and Hooky has done lead vocals on two songs. That's two out of quite a lot, he apparently doesn't want to do lead vocals. He didn't sing on many Monaco songs either. I haven't heard Revenge, so couldn't say. Live backing vocals for New Order is another matter altogether.

The band probably don't perceive the need for any other singer, Get Ready's guest vocalists were as a tentative marketing ploy, sales should have convinced them that the fans are here to stay.

0 likes

Originally posted by Nick Name I think the biggest clue here lies within. They've made seven albums or whatever it is, plus two as Joy Division, and Hooky has done lead vocals on two songs. That's two out of quite a lot, he apparently doesn't want to do lead vocals. He didn't sing on many Monaco songs either. I haven't heard Revenge, so couldn't say. Live backing vocals for New Order is another matter altogether.The band probably don't perceive the need for any other singer, Get Ready's guest vocalists were as a tentative marketing ploy, sales should have convinced them that the fans are here to stay.

:clap:

0 likes

Originally posted by Nick Name I think the biggest clue here lies within. They've made seven albums or whatever it is, plus two as Joy Division, and Hooky has done lead vocals on two songs. That's two out of quite a lot, he apparently doesn't want to do lead vocals. He didn't sing on many Monaco songs either. I haven't heard Revenge, so couldn't say. Live backing vocals for New Order is another matter altogether.The band probably don't perceive the need for any other singer, Get Ready's guest vocalists were as a tentative marketing ploy, sales should have convinced them that the fans are here to stay.

Not sure about that, if they wanted to capitalize on guest vocalists, Turn My Way would have been released as a single in the USA.

I'm still sure this was a sure hit.

0 likes

Bernard Sumner's voice was perfect for tracks like True Faith and Bizarre Love Triangle... but Hooky would definitely sound better on their harder edged tracks. And besides I actually prefer his voice, honest! :nod:

0 likes

Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney, Barney....

You get the gist.

:beer:

0 likes

I've just tired of his persistent growling and whooping... makes me cringe

0 likes

Originally posted by DShamen I've just tired of his persistent growling and whooping...makes me cringe

Well, just remember that YOU sir used the key word 'Persistant'...meaning that he has done this since No have been around, both live and on the albums. :nod: Therefore, we must conclude that since we, as a bunch of silly bickering NOOLers, have been sucking up these albums and pining to see them play live more in our individule little hick towns 'round this world, that we DO IN FACT enjoy this growling and whooping. :thumb: Personally, I get board when Barney DOESN'T engage in this 'annoying' banter and such. What does this mean? :confused2:

Maybe in some strange subconscious way, we are all masochists?

:skeptic:

0 likes

I wouldn't mind Hooky. Or David Potts (?), Monaco's Barney impersonator. My brother thought that WDYWFM was New Order when he heard it, was certain it was Barney

0 likes

Originally posted by MYOB I wouldn't mind Hooky. Or David Potts (?), Monaco's Barney impersonator. My brother thought that WDYWFM was New Order when he heard it, was certain it was Barney

Really? I always thought that Pottsy had a much 'Whinier' voice than Barney. Maybe it's just me, but It always sounded to me that Potts sounded like he just got kicked in the nuts by Peter!! :eek3:

0 likes

Originally posted by Sir CHUNKS > Originally posted by MYOB> I wouldn't mind Hooky. Or David Potts (?), Monaco's Barney impersonator. My brother thought that WDYWFM was New Order when he heard it, was certain it was Barney

Really? I always thought that Pottsy had a much 'Whinier' voice than Barney. Maybe it's just me, but It always sounded to me that Potts sounded like he just got kicked in the nuts by Peter!! :eek3:

I can see what you mean to a certain extent.

Ah well, they could always get me. Lower middle class Dublin accent + lots of time spent in UK = manchester accent almost.

0 likes

Originally posted by MYOB > Originally posted by Sir CHUNKS > Originally posted by MYOB> I wouldn't mind Hooky. Or David Potts (?), Monaco's Barney impersonator. My brother thought that WDYWFM was New Order when he heard it, was certain it was Barney

Really? I always thought that Pottsy had a much 'Whinier' voice than Barney. Maybe it's just me, but It always sounded to me that Potts sounded like he just got kicked in the nuts by Peter!! :eek3:

I can see what you mean to a certain extent.

Ah well, they could always get me. Lower middle class Dublin accent + lots of time spent in UK = manchester accent almost.

:clap: And why not!? I'll vote for ya! I ain't gonna do it!! :nuts:

But if NO decides they need a 'Modern Day' BEZ...I'm the man to call!!! :thumb:

0 likes

Modern day Bez? Barney already dances aimlessly...

Theres a video around somewhere of me trying to sing True Faith while a friend of mine tries to do the drum line too close to the mike pickup so I'm virtually inaudible... scary stuff though, always worried it could become blackmail material.

Thankfully my Crystal-on-karaoke-whilst-pissed episode wasn't recorded

0 likes

Unfortunately...there is a vidy of me somewheres that involves my drunk arse, a shoe and a chihuahua. That poor shoe!!! :confused2:

Now if THAT viddy got out...:rofl:

0 likes

I wouldnt mind hooky doing a bit of singing here and there on one track. But of course, bernard has the better voice.

0 likes

I'm sick of bands having guest vocalists on their albums, i'ts becoming incestuous. Barney doesn't need help singing, he can sing fine by himself. :laugh:

0 likes

Morrisey :D:rofl:

0 likes

Love Barney's voice and singing, also love Gillian's and she's contributed a few times. Not sure how she'd sound with Barney's fully matured vocals as he sang a lot differently when they actually sang together on Movement. Kind of strange listening to him album by album until Technique, I actually wasn't sure it was one vocalist handling all the singing duties when I first discovered him as he sounds distinctly different from album to album from Movement until Technique.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗